GP-9 run at rate 中英文
Run @ Rate GP-9
按预定能力生产
I.PURPOSE
目的
The purpose of a Run @ Rate is to verify:
Run @ Rate的目的是要核实：
A.the supplier's actual manufacturing process is capable of producing components that meet GM's on-going quality
requirements, as stated in the Production Part Approval Process (PPAP), at quoted tooling capacity for a specified
period of time; and
供应商的当前制造过程是否有能力在指定的一段时间内按声称的加工能力、生产出符合通用汽
车公司现行质量要求的零部件。如同在该零件“生产件批准” (PPAP) 文件中所述一致。
B.the supplier's actual manufacturing process conforms to the manufacturing and quality plan documented
by the supplier in PPAP, GP-12 and other required documentation
供应商的当前生产流程是否符合供应商在PPAP，GP-12或其它要求的文件中所记录的制造和
质量计划。
During a Run @ Rate, all production tooling is to be in place and running at full capacity, utilizing all regular
production, direct and indirect, personnel and support systems.
在Run @ Rate过程中，所有的生产工具应各就各位并且按最大能力运行，运用所有正式生产的
人员和支持系统，包括直接的和间接的。
II.SCOPE
适用范围
All new parts require a Run @ Rate, unless exempted by the supplier quality engineer and approved by the Supplier Quality and Purchasing Directors of the procuring division.
所有新的零部件都要通过Run @ Rate，除非供应商质量工程师认为可以免除并且得到采购部供应商质量和采购负责人的认可。
III.SELECTION PROCESS
规程选择
All new part numbers will be evaluated by GM, taking into consideration factors such as the following: history; new technology; irreversible tooling changes; and new supplier facilities. The need for the Run @ Rate will be confirmed by the Supplier Quality Engineer, and approved by the Supplier Quality and Purchasing Director(s) of the procuring division. The supplier will be notified of the need to perform a customer monitored or supplier monitored Run @ Rate as early in the Advanced Product Quality Planning Process as possible.
Note: See Section VIII for Additional Requirements for Supplier monitored Run @ Rate.
所有新零件号中的零件都要经过通用汽车公司的评审，将考虑到如下的一些因素：生产历史，新技术不能回复的模具更改，以及新的生产工厂等等。进行Run@Rate的必要性由供应商质量工程师确认，并且得到采购部门的供应商质量及采购负责人的认可。供应商将在前期产品质量计划(APQP)规程中尽早被通知是否要作一次用户监督或由供应商自行监督的Run @ Rate。
注：见第VIII节中有关于由供应商自行监督下的Run @ Rate R的附加要求。
IV.GENERAL INFORMATION
概述
A. DURATION OF RUN@RATE
Run @ Rate的周期
The number of components to be produced during the Run @ Rate should be sufficient to demonstrate
manufacturing process capability and should be predetermined by the supplier and the procuring division's Supplier
Quality Engineer(s). Factors such as product complexity, shelf life, storage, cost and single shift vs. multiple shift
operations are taken into consideration in determining the length of the Run @ Rate. The default length of the Run
@ Rate is one day of the customer's daily production requirement at full acceleration.
在Run@Rate过程中所生产的零部件的数量要足以表明其所具备的生产能力，并且由供应商和采购部门的质量工程师们共同预先商定。诸如产品复杂程度，有效期，贮存，费用，单班运作或多班轮作等等，都是影响Run@Rate时间长短应考虑的因素。Run@Rate的默认周期是用户满负荷生产时一天的需求量。
B.TIMING OF RUN@RATE
Run @ Rate的开始时间
The Run @ Rate should be performed after the supplier has attained an acceptable PPAP submission and prior to start of production acceleration. Although encouraged to be performed as early as possible, a key consideration in establishing the Run @ Rate date is the stability of the design. The exact date should be predetermined by the procuring division and the supplier.
供应商必须在获得PPAP生产件批准后及在开始加速生产之前进行Run@Rate。尽管越早进行越好但是进行Run@Rate的关键考虑因素是该零件设计的确定性。确切的日期应由采购部门和供应商共同确定。
C. REQUIRED PARTICIPATION
要求参加的人员
1. Customer Monitored -
用户监督
Customer - A representative from the procuring division is to be present for the entire Run @ Rate. No portion of the Run @ Rate is to be performed without representation of the procuring division, without prior approval. The lead GM representative typically will be the Supplier Quality Engineer, with participation of the Buyer and/or Release Engineer upon request.
Supplier - The lead supplier representative is to be the project manager or manager appointee.
用户－－采购部门的一个代表到现场监督整个生产过程。没有预先的许可，没有代表到场，不得进行任何的操作，GM方面的首席代表是供应商质量工程师。如有需要，采购员和产品放行工程师也可能被邀参加。
供应商－－供应方的首席代表应是项目经理或是该项目经理指定的代表。
2. Supplier Monitored -
供应商监督
The lead supplier representative is to be the project manager or manager appointee.
供应方的首席代表应是项目经理或其指定的代表
Note: Equipment and/or subcontractors may be asked to participate.
注：设备制造商和分包商也可能被要求参加。
D. SUPPLIER PREPARTATION FOR RUN@RATE
供应商为Run @ Rate所作的准备
To make effective use of time, the supplier should conduct a practice Run @ Rate and/or production simulations, as well as complete as much of the Run @ Rate Worksheet (Attachment B), before the official Run @ Rate is conducted.
为了能有效地利用时间，在正式的Run@Rate进行之前，供应商应作一次演习或相应的模拟生产，并完成工作表 (附录B) 上所规定的尽可能多的项目和所有问答。
E. INVENTORYE.
存货
If parts are produced ahead of production schedules, the supplier will hold all parts produced until authorized to ship. The supplier will ensure that sufficient production containers and
packaging are available to prevent part damage.
如果零件的制造发生在总装厂需要之前，供应商应保存全部的零件直到允许装运。供应商应保证有足够的生产用装运箱和合适的成品包装以防止零部件的损坏。
V.RUN@RATE REVIEW CONTENT
Run @ Rate检查内容
The Run @ Rate will verify that the results of the supplier's actual manufacturing process meet customer requirements for on-going quality, as stated in PPAP, and quoted tooling capacity. Also, it will verify that the supplier's actual process is to plan, as documented in PPAP, GP-12 and the other documentation listed below.
Run@Rate的目的是要核实供应商的实际制造过程是否符合现行质量要求(如在PPAP文件中所说的)以及报价所称的工装能力，并且供应商实际生产过程是否按照已订的计划，正如在PPAP、
GP12及下列其它文件中所述的。
During the Run @ Rate, the following will be reviewed: documentation; the manufacturing process and results; part quality requirements and results; sub-supplier requirements and Run @ Rate results; and packaging.
在Run@Rate过程中，检查以下一些项目：文件，制造工艺和其结果，零件质量要求和其结果，对分供方的要求及其Run @ Rate 的结果，还有包装和搬运。
A. DOCUMENTATION : At the time of the Run@Rate , the following support documentation
should be available for review:
文件 : 在作 Run @ Rate审核时，应出具下列证明性文件以备查阅。
1. PPAP package including :
PPAP 文件包括:
a) Process flow diagram 过程流程
b) Process control plan, with reaction plan 具有反应计划的过程控制计划
c) DFMEA / PFMEA 设计/过程失效模式及后果分析
d) Master part(s) 标样
2. GP-12( Pre-launch ) control plan
GP-12初期生产次品遏制的控制计划
3. Tool capacity information
工装能力情况
4. Operator/inspection instruction
操作 /检验指导书
5. Prototype / pilot concerns (PR/R’s)
样件/试生产时发生的问题(如PR/R)
6. Sub- contractor control / capacity data
分供方控制/能力数据
7. Sub-contractor material schedules and transportation
分供应商材料（含零件）生产计划及运输
8. Packaging / labeling plan
包装/ 标记计划
9. Acceleration plan
生产加速计划
Note : All documentation must be complete and correct
注: 所有文件都应完备及正确。
B.MANUFACTURING PROCESS – ACTUAL TO PLAN
制造过程–实际相对于计划
1. The product is being manufactured at the production site using the production tooling,
gaging, process, materials, operators, environment, and process settings.
产品应在生产现场用正式生产的工装、测量系统、工艺、材料、操作人员、环境和过程设定来进行生产。
2. The actual process flow agrees with the process flow diagram, as documented in PPAP.
实际生产流程应与PPAP 文件中的流程图相同。
3. Operator instructions/visual aids are available and adhered to at each work station.
应将操作指导书/目视参考图表置于相应的每个工作岗位。
4. All in-process documents, such as process control charts, are in place at the time of the
Run @ Rate. The documentation is utilized to drive a defined reaction plan and corrective action process.
在进行Run@Rate时，所有过程文件都应在工位上，如过程控制计划。这些文件应用于实施规定的反应计划和纠正措施。
5. Production boundary samples, when required, are available at required work stations. 当需
要时，在需要的工位上应拥有边际样品。
6. Maintenance plans are in place; repair and maintenance parts are available; and there is
planned downtime for preventative maintenance.
应具备保养计划和用于维修和保养的备件以及进行预防性维修保养的停机计划。
Note: All of the preceding requirements must be met to pass the Run @ Rate.
注：上述所有要求都须合格才能通过 Run @ Rate。
C.MANUFACTURING CAPACITY RESULTS
制造能力结果
The following will be verified while the process is running.
在进行生产时, 要核实以下内容：
1. Net output from each operation can support quoted capacity.
每道工序的净产量与报价生产能力相符。
2. During the Run @ Rate, the tooling must meet the quoted up time requirements (net vs.
gross quoted output). Any unexpected downtime must be documented and corrective
action taken.
在按预定能力生产时 ,工装应满足报价所要求的开机时间要求(报价净产量和标称毛产量)。
记下任何意外的停工时间和要求的改进措施计划。
3. All line changeovers, if any, can be performed within the quoted tooling capacity
requirements.
所有在线工装的更换应在报价工装能力要求范围内进行。
4. The net through-put of good pieces (scrap taken out, any allowable rework) meet daily
quoted capacity.
合格零件的净产量(剔除废品, 保留返工合格零件)应与报价日生产能力相符。
5. The acceleration plan is sufficient to meet requirements.
加速生产计划足以满足客户要求。
Note: All of the preceding five requirements must be met to pass the Run @ Rate.
注：上述所有五项要求都须合格才能通过 Run @ Rate。
D.PART QUALITY PLAN TO ACTUAL
零件质量计划同实际相对比
1. All production checking fixtures must be complete, with acceptable measurement system
studies (i.e., gage R and R) performed, and operator instructions/visual aids available.
所有生产检验设备应完备并且作了可接受的测量系统分析工作(即量具的重复性和再现性)。
应具备操作指导书/目视参考图表。
2. All in process gaging and controls must be complete, functional and in place.
所有生产过程中的测量和控制设备应完备, 功能齐全并且到位。
3. The process control plan (normal and GP-12) must agree with the actual process.
Production part checks and statistical monitoring must take place as outlined on the
process control plan
过程控制计划 (一般的和GP12)应与现行过程相符，应按过程控制计划作零件检验和统计监测。
4. Potential failure modes, as identified in the PFMEA, are addressed through error-proofing
or the control plan.
在PFMEA中所确定的潜在失效模式应有防错措施或控制计划来处置
5. The process control plan reaction plan as well as the supplier's corrective action process to
ensure containment and correction should be available for review.
过程控制计划的反应计划与供应商的改正措施一样，确保在检查时有遏制措施及施改正措施。
Note: All of the preceding five requirements must be met to pass the Run @ Rate.
注：上述所有要求都须合格才能通过 Run @ Rate。
E.PART QUALITY RESULTS
零件质量结果
1. All parts produced off production tooling during the Run @ Rate meet GM's requirements
for ongoing quality, as stated in PPAP.
在Run@Rate时,用生产工装生产出来的所有零件应符合PPAP中记载的GM对准予持续制造的质量要求。
2. The manufacturing process is in control.
制造过程必须受控。
3. The manufacturing process demonstrates the required capability.
制造过程应证明所要求的生产能力。
4. The process control plan is sufficient to effectively meet the design record requirements
(i.e., control points, frequency of checks, etc.).
过程控制计划应能有效地满足设计要求,（即控制点, 检验频率等）。
5. Nonconformance
不符合性
Note: The total number of parts produced, the pieces rejected and the pieces reworked need to be documented on the summary sheet.
注：生产出来的零件总数，不合格零件数，返工合格零件数都应在GP-9总结表上纪录
a) The non-conformances yielded by the process were identified by the normal PPAP
control plan. If identified by the GP-12 Process Control Plan or an activity outside
documented plans, corrective action is required.
生产过程中的不符合项可由一般的PPAP控制计划识别出来。如果是由GP12过程控制
计划或是由其他措施认别出来,则要求修改PPAP 控制计划。
b) The PFMEA identified the potential failure modes. If not, the PFMEA needs to be
updated and corrective action put in place. 生产过程中的不符合项在PFMEA中应有预
见，若未能做到，则PFMEA需要更新并且要采取改进措施。
c) All rework and repairs effectively correct the nonconformance(s).
返工及修复措施能有效地纠正不合格项。
d) All prototype and pilot concerns, if any, have been corrected and validated.
所有在工装样件及试生产件制造时发生的问题应已修正和验证。
Note: All of the preceding five requirements must be met to pass the Run @ Rate.
注：上述所有要求都须合格才能通过 Run @ Rate。
F.SUBCONTRACTOR REQUIREMENTS
分供方要求
1. Subcontractor(s)' abilities to meet the customer's quality and capacity requirements must
be confirmed by the supplier prior to the Run @ Rate being conducted at the supplier's
facility. Verification of the subcontractor(s)' manufacturing processes should be
accomplished through a Run @ Rate or similar process conducted by the supplier.
在进行Run@Rate以前，供应商应该对分供方是否能满足用户的质量和数量要求进行确
认。上述核实应由供应商采用Run @ Rate规程或相似的过程加以实施。
2. Controls must be in place to isolate incoming material until it has been approved.
应采取措施来隔离外来材料流入生产线，直到它被认可。
Note: The preceding requirements must be met to pass the Run @ Rate.
注：上述要求都须合格才能通过 Run @ Rate。
G. PACKAGING AND HANDLING
包装及装卸
1. In process and final shipment packaging will be reviewed for preservation of part quality
and ease of use by supplier's operators loading and unloading parts. (Refer to GM 1738
for requirements.)
将检查在生产过程中和最终运输的包装情况以保证零件的质量并且便于供应商的操作人员装
卸零件。(参见GM1738中的要求)。
2. The supplier's method for in process and final shipping packaging and handling must
effectively eliminate the potential for process errors or mixed stock.
在生产过程中及最终运输时所采用的包装及装卸方式应能有效地杜绝可能的程序差错及混
装。
VI.CORRECTIVE ACTIONS REQUIRED
需要做的纠正措施
A. Actual to Requirements. If the results of the actual manufacturing process do not meet
customer requirements for on-going quality and quoted tool capacity, corrective action must
be taken to correct any non-conformances.
实际产量与用户要求：
如果实际生产过程的结果达不到用户当前质量和声称的工装能力要求，应采取纠正措施消除这
些不一致的地方。
B. Actual to Plan. If the manufacturing and quality plan do not agree with the actual process,
changes must be made to bring them into agreement.
实际制造与质量计划：
如果实际过程达不到制造和质量计划要求，则应作相应的变动使两者达成一致。
C.Nonconformances. If nonconformances occurred during the Run @ Rate which were not
identified previously by the normal PPAP control plan, a corrective action plan needs to be put
in place (i.e., error proofing or a change in the control plan) and documented in the PFMEA
and/or process flow diagram.
不一致性：
如果在进行Run@Rate中,发生的不合格未能被一般的PPAP控制计划识别,必须采取纠正措施
(即防错措施或修改控制计划),并在PFMEA或工艺流程图中记录。
VII. APPROVAL
审定
Upon completion of the Run @ Rate, the worksheets must be reviewed for completeness and a decision
made whether or not to approve the review. The Run @ Rate can have one of three results: pass; open or fail.
Run @ Rate 一结束，应审查工作记录表以确保完整性，同时应作出决定：审查是否通
过。可以有下述三种结果之一：通过，待定，失败。
A. Pass 通过
1. Definition 定义
Pass indicates that all Run @ Rate requirements were met. The supplier demonstrated the
capability to produce parts that meet GM's on-going quality requirements at quoted
capacity (net output). All key product characteristics were monitored and meet Cpk/Ppk
requirements. GP-12 requirements were met. The supplier's actual manufacturing process
agreed with the manufacturing and quality plan, as documented by the supplier in PPAP,
GP-12 and other required documentation. Quality systems were documented and
practiced. 通过意味着满足全部的Run@Rate的要求。表明供应商具备生产出符合GM现行
质量要求的产品及具备所要求的生产能力。所有关键的产品性能是在监督测定并且满足
CPK/PPK的要求。满足GP12的要求。供应商的实际制造过程符合制造和质量计划，这些
规划由供应商记录在PPAP，GP-12和其它要求的文件中。质量体系有成文记录并切实执
行。
B. Open 待定
1. Definition Open indicates that some minor non-conformances to the requirements were
found that need to be corrected. Examples of this are net output meets volume
requirements but not quoted capacity; quality systems have minor deficiencies (i.e.,
preventative maintenance system lacking, lack of error proofing, incomplete or inadequate
operator instructions/visual aids, operator training not complete, minor deficiencies in
meeting customer's ongoing quality requirements).
定义：待定意味着产品的有些方面与所要求的稍有不一致，需要作改进。比如，产量符合客
户数量要求但达不到报价声称的生产能力；质量系统有小缺陷(例：缺少预防性保养计划，
缺少防错措施，操作规则等不完备或不合适，操作人员培训不充分，有些地方不符合用户
现行质量要求)。
2. Corrective Action Required A documented Action Plan to correct the non-conformances is
required. At a minimum, it must include the name of the individual at the Supplier who is
responsible for implementing the Corrective Action and the timing and validation of the
Corrective Action Plan. This plan is due to the GM Run @ Rate Supplier Quality Engineer
for approval, within two (2) business days of the completion of the Run @ Rate.
需做的改进措施:要求一个成文的纠正这些偏差的措施。并且，它应包括供应方负责执行整
改措施、控制进度及考核成效的人员名单。该计划需由GM负责Run@Rate评审的供应商
质量工程师来审核，并在Run@Rate结束后两天之内完成。
3. Verification of Corrective Action GM verification of successful completion of the corrective
action plan can be accomplished in several different ways, for example, through
correspondence, a part review or a plant visit. Generally an additional Run @ Rate is not
required. Once the Corrective Action plan is successfully completed, the Supplier Quality
Engineer will change the Run @ Rate result from open to pass.
改进措施的验证:验证改进措施是否顺利完成有几种不同的方法。例如，通过联系，对一批
零件的检查或是参观生产现场。通常不需要再作Run@Rate。一旦改进措施顺利地完成，供
应商质量工程师将把Run@Rate的结果由待定改为通过。
C. Fail 失败
1. Definition Fail indicates a serious non-conformance exists that requires significant action
by the supplier to correct, such as quality systems are not in place and serious non-
onformances exist; Ppk values (Cpk values) do not meet requirements for KPC’s; or
supplier fails to meet Volume Requirements. An additional Run @ Rate will be required.
定义：“失败”意味着存在着严重的不一致的地方，要求供应商采取一些重大的措施来加以改
进。这些不一致有：质量系统不存在并有严重不一致质量问题存在，关键产品特性的Ppk值
(Cpk值)达不到KPC的要求，或者供应商达不到产量要求，因此要求重新作Run @
Rate。
2. Corrective Action Required A documented Action Plan to correct the non-conformances is
required. At a minimum, it must include the name of the individual at the Supplier who is
responsible for implementing the Corrective Action and the timing and validation of the
Corrective Action Plan. This plan is due to the GM Run @ Rate Supplier Quality Engineer
for approval, within two (2) business days of the completion of the Run @ Rate.
需做的改进措施:要求有一个成文的改正这些偏差的措施。并且，它应包括供应方负责执行
整改措施、控制进度及考核成效的人员名单，该计划的要由GM负责Run@Rate评审的供
应商质量工程师来审核，并在 Run @ Rate结束后两天内完成。
3. Verification of Corrective Action. Once the Corrective Action plan is completed, the
Supplier Quality Engineer will schedule the new Run @ Rate to verify the successful
implementation of the corrective action plan.
改进措施的验证:改进措施计划完成以后，供应商质量工程师将按排进行新的Run@Rate，
以验证改进措施是否有执行成效。
VIII.Supplier Monitored Run @ Rate Additional Requirements
供应商监督下的Run @ Rate的附加要求
A. All Run @ Rate requirements identified in Sections IV. V, VI and VII of this procedure apply to
both supplier monitored and customer monitored Run @ Rates.
所有在本程序第IV、V、VI、VII节中对Run@Rate的要求不论是供应商监督或是由用户监督下
的Run @ Rate均适用。
Note: The scheduled date for the Run @ Rate must be approve by The Supplier Quality Engineer.
注：由供应商监督的Run @ Rate的日期安排应得到供应商质量工程师的认可。
B. Since a customer representative will not be present during the Run @ Rate, the following must
be completed.
由于用户代表将不参加Run @ Rate，因此供应商应该完成以下工作。
1. Within twenty-four hours of completing the scheduled Run @ Rate, the supplier must
complete the Run @ Rate Summary and Worksheets (Attachments A and B) and provide them to the responsible customer Supplier Quality Engineer, with a recommendation for the result of the Run @ Rate.
在完成Run@Rate以后24小时内，供应商应写出Run@Rate总结及工作表(附录A和B)并将其交给用户方负责人供应商质量工程师，并对 Run @ Rate 的结果提出某些建议。
2. In addition, if any non-conformances were identified, the supplier will develop and
implement a corrective action plan, using Sections VI and VII as reference. Within two days of completing the scheduled Run @ Rate, the supplier will provide this information to the responsible customer Supplier Quality Engineer.
另外，如果发现有不一致的地方，供应商应参照第VI、VII节的要求，制定并实施改进计划，并在完成Run @ Rate两天内，将该信息通知用户方负责人供应商质量工程师。
3. Based on the information provided by the supplier, the customer Supplier Quality Engineer
will:
根据供应商提供的信息，客户方供应商质量工程师要做如下几项工作：
a) Determine whether the Run @ Rate results in a pass, open or fail.
确定运行结果是通晕，待定还是不通过。
b) Review and approve the corrective action plan.
审批改进措施计划
c) Determine the need for an additional Run @ Rate.
确定是否需要再作 Run @ Rate
d) Communicate the results of the above review to the supplier.
将上述审查结果驼知供应商
4. If the result of the Run @ Rate is open or fail, the process described in Section VII applies.
如果 Run @ Rate 的结果是待定或失败，则第 VII 节的内容将适用。
Note: If the supplier monitored Run @ Rate results in a fail, another Run @ Rate must be scheduled with a customer representative present
注：如果由供应监督的 Run @ Rate 结果失败，则下一次的 Run @ Rate 须有用户方代表参加。
GP-9 RUN @ RATE SUMMARY
GP －9“按预定能力生产”总结
Supplier 供应商
Mfg. Location
制造地址
DUNs
Supplier Quoted production rate 供应商报价生产能力 / Hr 小时 /Day 天
Customer Buyer Phone 用户 采购员
电话
Planned usage: Daily
weekly SQE Phone 计划 要货 率： 每天 每周 质量工程师 电话
Planned Run Date 计划 运行日期
Planned Hours To Run 计划 运行小时数
Planned Shifts Planned Downtime 计划 班次 计划停工时间
Reason for Planned Downtime 计划停工的原因
RESULTS 结果
Actual Hours From To 实际小时数 从 至
Actual shifts date 实际班数 日期
Actual Downtime Hours (planned & unplanned) 实际停工时间 （计划 和非计划）
Explain :
解释：
Total produced -Total Rejected =Net
生产总数-总拒收量=净生产量
Comments/ Open issues:
备注/ 待解决问题：
PASS OPEN FAIL Rerun date
供应商 Run @ Rate 的建议：通过待定失败重运行日期Comments :
备注：
Supplier Signature Title Phone Date
供应商签字职务电话日期
For Customer Monitored Run At Rates
适用于用户监督的 Run @ Rate
OPEN FAIL Rerun date
Run @ Rate 总结：通过待定失败重运行日期Authorized Customer Supplier Quality Signature Title Date
经授权的用户供应商质量签名职务日期Comments/ Open issues:
备注/ 待解决问题：
RUN @ RATE WORKSHEET GP-9
“按预定能力生产”工作表
Supplier Name : P/N :
供应商名称：零件号：
RUN @ RATE REVIEW CONTENT
Run @ Rate 检查内容
The Run @ Rate , will verify that the results of the supplier抯 actual manufacturing process meet customer requirements for on-going quality , as stated in PPAP , and quoted tooling capacity . Also it will verify that the supplier抯 actual process is to plan , as documented in PPAP ,GP-12 and the other documentation listed below.
Run @ Rate 是要核实供应商现行的生产过程之结果/成果是否达到顾客准予其持续（制造）质量要求（在PPAP中阐述）及报价工装能力。并且还核实供应商的实际过程是否按照在PPAP、GP－12和其他如下所述文件中的计划实行。
During the Run @ Rate , the following will be reviewed :documentation ; the manufacturing process and results ; part quality requirements and results ; sub-supplier requirements and Run @ Rate results and packaging .
在 Run @ Rate 中，将检查以下内容：文件；制造过程及结果；零件质量要求及结果；分供方要求； Run @ Rate 结果和包装。
A . Documentation 文件
At the time of the Run @ Rate , the following support documentation should be available for review :
在 Run @ Rate 过程中，下列支持文件应备查：
Available 是否具备 Y/N
1 . PPAP package including PPAP 文件应包括： 1
a) process flow diagram 过程流程图 a
b
b) process control plan , with reaction plan 具有反应计划的过程控制计
划
c) DFMEA/PFMEA设计/过程失效模式及后果分析 c
d) Master part (s) 标样 d
2 . GP-12 (Pre-launch Control )plan GP-12 （试生产控制）计划 2
3 . Tool capacity information 工装能力情况 3
4 . Operator / inspection instruction 操作/检验指导书 4
5 . Prototype/pilot concerns (PR/R扴) 样件/试生产时发生的问题（PR/R） 5
6 . Sub-contractor control /capacity data 分供方控制/能力数据 6
分供应商材料(含零件)生产计划及运输
7
8 . Packaging/labeling plan 包装/标记计划8
9 . Acceleration plan 加速计划9
Note : All documentation must be complete and correct.
注：所有文件都应完备及正确。
B . MANUFACTURING PROCESS -ACTUAL TO PLAN 制造过程－－实际相对于计划
1 . Is the product being manufactured at the production site using the production tooling ,gaging, process,
material, operators, environment, and process settings?
该产品是否在生产现场用正式生产工装、测量系统、过程、材料、操作人员、环境和过程设定进行
生产 ?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
2 . Does the actual process flow agree with diagram, as documented in PPAP ? (Review the facility plan and layout. Walk the process with the flow diagram. )
实际生产流程是否与PPAP 文件中的流程图相同？（检查设备计划和场地平面图。按流程图检查
实际流程）
Yes No Comments（备注）:
3 . Are operator instruction /visual controls available and adhered to at each work station ?
操作指导书/目视控制是否具备并附于相应的每个工作岗位？
Yes No Comments（备注）:
4 . Is all in-process documentation, such as process control charts, in place at the time of the Run @ Rate ? Is the documentation utilized to drive a defined reaction plan and correction action process?
在进行 Run @ Rate 时，是否所有过程文件都在工位上？如过程控制计划。这些文件是否用于实施规定的反应计划和纠正措施？
Yes No Comments（备注）:
5 . When required , are production boundary sample available at required work station ? Are boundary samples approved by SGM?
当需要时，在需要的工位上是否拥有边际样品？这些样品是否经上海通用认可？
Yes No Comments（备注）:
6 . Are maintenance plans in place? Are repair and maintenance parts available ? Is there planed downtime for
preventative maintenance ?
是否具备保养计划？是否有用于维修和保养的备件？是否有进行预防性维修保养的停机计划？
Yes No Comments（备注）:
Note : All of the preceding requirements must be met to pass Run @ Rate.
注：上述所有要求都须合格才能通过 Run @ Rate。
C. MANUFACTURING CAPACITY RESULTS 制造能力结果
The following will be verified while the process is running 在进行生产时, 要核实以下内容。
1. Can net output from each operation support quoted capacity 每道工序的净产量是否与报价生产能力相符 ? Yes No Comments（备注）:
Operation 工序 Quoted Capacity 报价生产能力 Rate 实际
2. During the Run @ Rate, did the tooling meet the quoted up time requirements(net vs gross quoted output) ?
Make note of any unexpected downtime and corrective action plans required.
在按预定能力生产时, 工装是否满足报价所要求的开机时间要求? (报价净产量和标称的毛产量) 记下任何
意外的停工时间和要求的改进措施计划.
Yes No Comments（备注）:
3. Can all line changeovers, if any, be performed within the quoted tooling capacity requirements?
所有在线工装的更换是在报价工装能力要求范围内进行的吗?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
4. Does the net through-put of good pieces(scrap taken out, any allowable rework) meet daily quoted capacity ? 合格零件的
净产量(剔除废品, 保留返工合格零件)与报价日生产能力是否相符?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
5. Is the acceleration plan sufficient to meet requirements ? 加速生产计划是否足以满足要求?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
Note : All of the preceding five requirements must be met to pass Run @ Rate.
注：上述所有五项要求都须合格才能通过 Run @ Rate。
D. P art quality plan to actual 零件质量计划与实际相比较.
1.Are all Production checking fixtures complete, with acceptable measurement system studies (i.e.,gage R and R)
performed, and operator instruction/visual aids available ?
产品检验设备是否完备? 是否作了可接受的测量系统分析工作 (即量具可重复性和再现性)?操作指导书/目
视控制是否具备?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
2.Are all in process gaging and controls complete, functional and in place?
过程测量和控制是否完备, 功能齐全并且到位?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
3.Do the process control plans(normal and GP-12) agree with the actual process? Do production part checks and
statistical monitoring take place as outlined on the process control plan?
过程控制计划 (一般的和 GP-12)是否与现行过程相符?是否按过程控制计划作零件检验和统计监测?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
4. Are potential failure modes, as identified in the PFMEA, addressed through error-proofing or the control plan? 在
PFMEA中所确定的潜在失效模式是否有防错措施或控制计划来处置?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
5. Do the process control reaction plan and the supplier抯 corrective actions ensure effective containment and correction?
过程控制计划之反应计划和供应商的整改措施是否有效地保证了遏制次品和缺点改进取得实效?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
Note : All of the preceding requirements must be met to pass Run @ Rate.
注：上述所有要求都须合格才能通过 Run @ Rate。
E. PART QUALITY RESULTS 零件质量结果
Note: The total number of parts produced, the pieces rejected and the pieces reworked must be documented on the
summary sheet. 注: 生产零件总数, 不合格零件数, 及返工零件数都记在总结表中.
1.Do the parts produced off production tooling during the Run @ Rate meet SGM抯 requirements for on-going
quality, as stated in PPAP ?
在按预定能力生产时, 用生产工装生产出来的零件是否符合PPAP中记载的SGM对准予持续制造的质量
要求?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
2.Is the manufacturing process in control ? 制造过程是否受控?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
3.Does the manufacturing process demonstrate the required capability ?
制造过程能否证明所要求的生产能力?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
4. Is the process control plan sufficient to effectively meet the design record requirement, i.e., control points, frequency
of checks, etc.? 过程控制计划是否足以满足设计要求,即控制点, 检验频率等?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
5. Nonconformances 不符合性
a) Were the non-conformances yielded by the process identified by the normal PPAP control plan ? 过程中的不符
合性是否能由一般的PPAP控制计划识别出来? Yes 是: No 否: If
identified by the GP-12 Process Control Plan or an activity outside documented plans, corrective action
is required. 如果是由GP-12过程控制计划或是由其他措施认别出来,则要求采取改进措施，改进
PPAP 控制计划。
b) Did the PFMEA identify the potential failure modes ? PFMEA是否识别了潜在故障模式?
Yes 是: No 否: If not, the PFMEA needs to be updated and corrective action put in
place. 如果不是, 则PFMEA 需要更新并且要采取改进措施。
c) Do all the observed rework and repairs effectively correct the nonconformance(s) ?
返工及返修复措施是否有效地纠正了那些偏差? Yes 是: No 否:
d) Are there any open concerns from prototype or pilot (PR/R) ? 对样件或试生产件是否有未解决的
问题?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
Note : All of the preceding requirements must be met to pass Run @ Rate.
注：上述所有要求都须合格才能通过 Run @ Rate。
F. SUBCONTRACTOR REQUIREMENTS 分供方要求
1. Were subcontractors’ abilities to meet the customer抯 quality and capacity requirements confirmed by the supplier
prior to the Run @ Rate being conducted at the supplier抯facility? Was verification of the subcontractors’ manufacturing process accomplished through a Run @ Rate or similar process conducted by the supplier?
在进行 Run @ Rate 前, 是否已经核实分供方有能力满足用户的质量及生产能力的要求? 是否通过 Run @ Rate 或相似的过程来核实分供方制造过程?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
2. Are Control in place to isolate incoming material until it has been approved?
是否对进货材料进行隔离控制直到认可?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
Note : The two preceding requirements must be met to pass Run @ Rate.
注：上述二项要求都须合格才能通过 Run @ Rate。
G. P ACKAGING AND HANDLING 包装和装卸
1. During the review of in process and final shipment packaging for preservation of part quality and ease of use by
supplier抯 operators loading and unloading parts, were any problem identified?
为保持产品质量和便于供应商操作人员装卸货物,在生产过程和最终运输包装的检查中是否发现什么
问题?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
2. Does the supplier抯 method for in process and final shipping packaging and handling effectively eliminate the
potential for process errors or mixed stock?
在生产过程和最终运输包装和装卸中,供应商所采取的方式是否有效地消除了潜在的操作错误和成品
参杂存放?
Yes No Comments（备注）:
Comments 备注:
Completed by 填写 Phone 电话 Date 日期