文档库 最新最全的文档下载
当前位置:文档库 › Targeting an antimicrobial effector function in insect immunity as a pest control strategy

Targeting an antimicrobial effector function in insect immunity as a pest control strategy

Targeting an antimicrobial effector function in insect immunity as a pest control strategy
Targeting an antimicrobial effector function in insect immunity as a pest control strategy

Targeting an antimicrobial effector function in insect immunity as a pest control strategy

Mark S.Bulmer a,1,2,3,Ido Bachelet b,1,Rahul Raman b ,Rebeca B.Rosengaus a,4,and Ram Sasisekharan b,3,4

a Department

of Biology,Northeastern University,Boston,MA 02115;and b Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology,Department

of Biological Engineering,Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research,Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Cambridge,MA 02139

Communicated by Gerald N.Wogan,Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Cambridge,MA,April 13,2009(received for review January 27,2009)

Insect pests such as termites cause damages to crops and man-made structures estimated at over $30billion per year,imposing a global challenge for the human economy.Here,we report a strategy for compromising insect immunity that might lead to the development of nontoxic,sustainable pest control methods.Gram-negative bacteria binding proteins (GNBPs)are critical for sensing pathogenic infection and triggering effector responses.We report that termite GNBP-2(tGNBP-2)shows ?(1,3)-glucanase effector activity previously unknown in animal immunity and is a pleiotro-pic pattern recognition receptor and an antimicrobial effector protein.Termites incorporate this protein into the nest building material,where it functions as a nest-embedded sensor that cleaves and releases pathogenic components,priming termites for improved antimicrobial defense.By means of rational design,we present an inexpensive,nontoxic small molecule glycomimetic that blocks tGNBP-2,thus exposing termites in vivo to accelerated infection and death from speci?c and opportunistic pathogens.Such a molecule,introduced into building materials and agricul-tural methods,could protect valuable assets from insect pests.

?(1,3)-glucanase ?Gram-negative bacteria binding proteins ?pattern recognition receptor ?termites ?social insect immunity

I

nsect immune systems are simple,efficient,and still enigmatic (1–3).Somatic Ig hypervariability has been observed in Anoph-eles and Drosophila (4,5)and may represent ancestral versions of adaptive immunity,although its evolutionary and functional significance in this context is not clear.Insects employ other,well-characterized mechanisms.Among these are pattern rec-ognition receptors,which recognize molecular determinants unique to different classes of pathogenic microorganisms (1–3).Gram-negative bacteria binding proteins (GNBPs)are a class of conserved receptors (6,7)that signal the presence of patho-gens once they enter the hemocoel (8).Insect GNBPs contain regions with significant homology to bacterial ?-glucanases,especially ?(1,3)-and ?(1,3)-(1,4)-glucanases (6,9–11)and likely represent evolutionary descendants of enzymes originally serv-ing homeostatic or digestive functions.Several peptidoglycan rec-ognition proteins,members of a different receptor group in mam-mals and insects,were shown to be in fact active amidases that either initiate protective signaling cascades or are directly bactericidal (12).GNBPs are believed to have lost enzymatic activity and thus serve only as pattern recognition receptors (9,10,13).

Here,we show that a termite GNBP demonstrates ?(1,3)-glucanase activity,serving a critical effector function in antimi-crobial defense.By analysis of the structure–function relation-ships of this protein,we present a small molecule glycomimetic that is capable of blocking it,thus suppressing the insect’s immune system and exposing it to attacks from specific and opportunistic pathogens.This molecule represents an inexpen-sive,nontoxic,and environmentally safe alternative to toxic pesticide chemicals currently in global use.Results and Discussion

Termites Express ?(1,3)-Glucanase Activity.In a previous study (6),

we reported that termite GNBPs were positively selected fol-lowing a single duplication event before the divergence of Mastotermes ,the most ancient lineage of the Isoptera.Adaptive evolution in termite GNBPs appears to have been driven by a coevolutionary arms race and shifts in habitat that have likely exposed termites to new groups of pathogenic microorganisms (6,14,15).However,our sequence analysis of GNBPs from various termite lineages showed that the critical residues in-volved in the ?(1,3)-glucanase activity remained surprisingly intact.Interestingly,the catalytic site appears to have been maintained in the GNBPs of several other insects,and their phylogenetic distribution suggests that GNBPs cluster in discrete groups that have either maintained or lost ?(1,3)-glucanase activity (Fig.1A ).

Measurement of ?(1,3)-glucanase activity in Nasutitermes corniger ,performed by electrophoresis on a chromogenic sub-strate gel,revealed significant activity in body tissues and secretions including salivary glands and cuticular washes (Fig.1B ).Other termite species (Zootermopsis augusticollis ,Cryptot-ermes secundus ,and Rubriceps flavipes )also showed robust ?(1,3)-glucanase activity.This activity was demonstrated by all castes.Other insects,such as Galleria mellonella and Drosophila melanogaster (Fig.1B ),had no activity.Still,this activity is not limited to termites as suggested by our sequence analysis and as recently reported for several pest species (16–18).

The fungal entomopathogen Metarhizium anisopliae is a nat-ural termite pathogen and is currently being developed for the biological control of termites and other insect pests (19).M.anisopliae conidia treated with ?(1,3)-glucanases purified from either Helix pomatia or Bacillus subtilis collapsed due to turgor pressure loss and leakage of intracellular components.Similarly,conidia treated with a termite protein size-exclusion fraction coinciding with peak ?(1,3)-glucanase activity likewise col-lapsed,and their cell volume decreased by 25%(Fig.1C ,cell volume reduction shown in Inset ).

Termite GNBP-2Is an Active ?(1,3)-Glucanase Induced by Pathogenic Patterns.To associate a termite GNBP with the observed activity,

antibodies were raised against termite GNBP-1and -2(tGNBP-1and tGNBP-2,respectively).Native,tGNBP-2was successfully isolated and purified by immunoaffinity chromatography from both termite extract and nests built from various materials (Fig.2A )and exhibited robust ?(1,3)-glucanase activity (Fig.2B ).No equivalent proteins were precipitated from soil or wood.

Author contributions:M.S.B.,I.B.,R.B.R.,and R.S.designed research;M.S.B.,I.B.,and R.R.performed research;R.B.R.and R.S.contributed new reagents/analytic tools;M.S.B.,I.B.,R.R.,R.B.R.,and R.S.analyzed data;and M.S.B.,I.B.,R.B.R.,and R.S.wrote the paper.The authors declare no con?ict of interest.

1M.S.B.

and I.B.contributed equally to this work.

2Present

address:Department of Biological Sciences,Towson University,Towson,MD

21252.

3To

whom correspondence may be addressed.E-mail:mbulmer@https://www.wendangku.net/doc/ad18717998.html, or rams@https://www.wendangku.net/doc/ad18717998.html,.

4R.B.R.

and R.S.contributed equally to this work.

This article contains supporting information online at https://www.wendangku.net/doc/ad18717998.html,/cgi/content/full/0904063106/DCSupplemental .

12652–12657?PNAS ?August 4,2009?vol.106?no.31

https://www.wendangku.net/doc/ad18717998.html, ?cgi ?doi ?10.1073?

pnas.0904063106

tGNBP-2was detected in termite HPLC fractions displaying peak ?(1,3)-glucanase activity (Fig.S1)and was found to be expressed on the surfaces of two distinct hemocyte populations,granular hemocytes (Electronic Volume lo /Side Scatter hi )and large,less dense hemocytes (Electronic Volume hi /Side Scatter lo ,presumably plasmatocytes)(Fig.2C ).The hydrophobic tail of tGNBP-2is highly homologous to the tail of Drosophila GNBP (20)and therefore likely serves as a GPI anchor.Existence in both soluble and membrane-associated forms is common among pattern receptors including mammalian CD14(21)and various insect proteins (22).

The presence of active tGNBP-2in nest material indicates that termites incorporate but also maintain the levels of this protein in the nest structure.This observation points to a possible

mechanism wherein tGNBP-2functions as a nest-embedded sensor that cleaves and releases pathogenic components,which then prime termites for improved antimicrobial immunity.In-deed,termites exposed to either Gram-negative bacteria-derived LPS or an algae-derived ?(1,3)-D -glucan show improved resis-tance to M.anisopliae infection (Fig.2D ).Analysis of tGNBP-2expression revealed significant up-regulation following exposure to either molecular component (Fig.2E ).Moreover,infection of termites with either Serratia marcescens or M.anisopliae also induced the expression of tGNBP-2as early as 1.5h postinfec-tion,whereas control groups for stress caused by cooling and pin-pricking remained close to baseline levels (Fig.2F ).This finding is in agreement with a previously reported Drosophila GNBP (20)and shows that tGNBP-2is pattern specific rather than stress induced.The use of tGNBP-2as an external defense system is likely to have been instrumental in the evolution of complex societies with elaborate nest architectures.Moreover,evolution of social behaviors,such as the increased mutual grooming observed following exposure to fungal pathogens (23),may have been directed by the protective function of salivary tGNBP-2.

tGNBP-2Is an Antimicrobial Effector Protein.Two important ques-

tions were:(a)Is the ?(1,3)-glucanase activity of tGNBP-2an effector activity,and (b)does this activity critically contribute to the total effector capacity of the termite immune system,or is it redundant to additional mechanisms?Crude termite extract,representing the total effector capacity,is cytotoxic to Metarhi-zium conidia (Fig.2G Left ).To observe this at a higher resolution,the extract was fractionated into either 13or 20size fractions crossed in 13?13or 20?20matrices,respectively,and the cytotoxicity of every fraction combination toward Metarhi-zium was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis of conidia cell volume.

Combining tGNBP-2?fractions with fractions corresponding to ?5,000Da molecules (Fig.2G Right )resulted in significant synergistic cytotoxicity compared with that exerted by tGNBP-2alone.This synergistic effect was abolished by depletion of tGNBP-2(Fig.2H ).One possible explanation for this intriguing finding is that tGNBP-2cooperates with small antimicrobial peptides such as termicin and spinigerin (24–26)by compromis-ing cell wall integrity and enhancing peptide penetration into the cell,a mechanism used by plant ?(1,3)-glucanases (27).These antimicrobial peptides are constitutively expressed at high levels in termites,and mass spectrometric analysis suggested the presence of these peptides by size (Fig.S2).Termicins are also secreted by salivary glands (26).This combinatorial mapping demonstrates that tGNBP-2is a critical component of the termite antimicrobial potential.

Structure–Function Analysis of the Pattern Recognition and Enzymatic Activity of tGNBP-2.To examine whether tGNBP-2represents a

functional pattern recognition receptor,we quantified the in-teractions between this protein and a range of intact termite pathogens.Isolated tGNBP-2exhibited binding to both Gram-negative bacteria and fungi,with significantly higher affinity to bacteria than to fungi (Fig.3A ).

The structural basis of this dual function was studied using a homology-based model where ?(1,3)-D -glucan and eritoran (an LPS analog)are docked into tGNBP-2.This model suggests that ?(1,3)-D -glucans are bound and catalyzed at the intact glucanase region,whereas a distinct hydrophobic patch upstream to it binds LPS (Fig.3B ).Homologous patches have been shown to bind LPS in other insects (28).The model shows that the ?(1,3)-D -glucan is potentially held in place by 6residues,5of which are chemically similar in termite GNBP-2proteins and in Bacillus circulans ?(1,3)-glucanase but vary among other insect GNBPs (Table S1),providing a structural insight into the

enzymatic

Fig.1.Termites exhibit an unusual ?(1,3)-glucanase activity.(A )Distance tree of insect GNBPs rooted with B.circulans ?(1,3)-glucanase.Numbers depict bootstrap values for basal lineages.Glucanase motif sequences are adjacent to species name.Termite species appear in blue.Numbers following species name indicate GNBP-1,-2,etc.(B )?(1,3)-Glucanase activity in termite tissues and cuticular washes,assayed on Carboxymethyl Curdlan Remazol Brilliant Blue gels (lanes:1,soldier;2,large worker;3,large worker;4,10workers;5–7,1,5,and 30large workers,respectively)(Left ).Comparison of activity in extracts from termites (lanes:1,Nasutitermes corniger collected from Florida;2–4,N.corniger collected from different colonies in Panama),Drosophila melanogaster and Galleria mellonella (Right ).(C )Activity pro?le of fraction-ated termites separated by HPLC.(Inset )Cytotoxic effect of the peak active fraction (marked with an arrowhead)from termites on Metarhizium anisop-liae conidia measured by ?ow cytometry as the effect on cell volume in femtoliters (*,P ?0.05vs.buffer).

Bulmer et al.

PNAS ?August 4,2009?vol.106?no.31?12653

A P P L I E D

B I O L O G I

C A L S C I E N C E

S

activity of tGNBP-2.Interestingly,we found that binding of LPS and catalysis of ?(1,3)-D -glucans do not cross-interfere with each other,showing that they are distinct both structurally and functionally (Fig.S3).

Rational Design of a Glycomimetic tGNBP-2Blocker.These findings

implicated the ?(1,3)-glucanase activity of tGNBP-2as a critical component in termite antimicrobial defense.We therefore sought a way to block this protein that will target only its unusual ?(1,3)-glucanase activity and leave its other parts intact.This requirement along with our aim of designing a pest control strategy highlighted a small molecule approach.We hypothe-sized that a glycomimetic derivative of the pathogenic patterns recognized by tGNBP-2would be both a structurally rational and a synthetically feasible blocker.

The combination of a pocket,formed by the 6residues immobilizing the glycan,and the active core that flanks this pocket determines that a ?(1,3)glycosidic linkage must be the

reducing-end determinant of the polysaccharide chain and pre-sented to the active core.Therefore,a glucan chain (n ?1)with a terminal modification was hypothesized to occupy the receptor and hold it an inactive state.

To validate this concept,we started with the simplest chain,a single glucose molecule,whereas a modification of the reducing end would provide a determinant probably sufficient to inacti-vate the receptor.We therefore selected an existing molecule that completely satisfied these requirements,the glucose deriv-ative D -?-gluconolactone (GDL)(29–31).

GDL efficiently blocked the activity of tGNBP-2but left other ?-glucanases intact (Fig.3C ),indicating good specificity for the purpose of this study.In response to a ?(1,3)-D -glucan challenge,termite hemocytes responded by stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK)/JNK phosphorylation (32).GDL inhibited this activa-tion response and the subsequent induction of tGNBP-2(Fig.3D ).Interestingly,however,of the two hemocyte populations expressing tGNBP-2,only granular cells were blocked by

GDL,

Fig.2.tGNBP-2is an effector ?(1,3)-glucanase induced by pathogenic patterns.(A )Immunoprecipitation of tGNBP-2from termite extracts,nests,unprocessed wood,and soils A and B sampled from different locations.(B )?(1,3)-Glucanase activity of termite immunoprecipitate isolated by rabbit IgG or anti-tGNBP-2(*,P ?0.05vs.no protein and rabbit IgG).(C )Expression of tGNBP-2on hemocyte surface,measured by ?ow cytometry.(D )Survival of termites infected with Metarhizium anisopliae (M.aniso )following immunization with LPS or laminarin at either 0.5or 5mg/mL along a course of 10days (mean of 2groups,n ?12/group;all immunized termite groups were P ?0.05vs.M.aniso only,and P ?0.05vs.na?ve termites with the exception of 0.5mg/mL LPS).(E )tGNBP-2expression after exposure of termites to either LPS or laminarin at either 0.5or 5mg/mL (left and right lanes in each sample represent two independent repeats).(F )Expression of tGNBP-2after termite infection with M.anisopliae (M.aniso )or Serratia marcescens (S.marc ).Cooled only (cooled)or cooled and pricked (pricked)termites are shown as controls.(G )Effect of crude termite extract on conidial growth (in CFUs)on potato-dextrose agar plates (*,P ?0.05vs.untreated conidia)(Left ).Cytotoxicity map of fractionated termites on M.anisopliae conidia measured by cell volume in femtoliters (Right ).F (x ),F (y )represent fractions 1–13on either axis.The tGNBP-2?fraction is marked by an arrowhead;asterisks mark putative antimicrobial peptides.(H )Loss of cytotoxicity after depletion of tGNBP-2by antibody precipitation.F (x ),F (y )represent fractions 1–20on either axis.

12654?https://www.wendangku.net/doc/ad18717998.html, ?cgi ?doi ?10.1073?pnas.0904063106

Bulmer et

al.

suggesting that plasmatocytes have additional glucan-recognizing mechanisms and might have distinct roles in anti-microbial immunity.

GDL Suppresses Termite Antimicrobial Immunity In Vivo.Finally,we

aimed at demonstrating the effects of tGNBP-2blockade on termite survival.Termites died rapidly following infection with M.anisopliae .When conidia were treated with isolated tGNBP-2before infection,termite survival was remarkably similar to that of uninfected groups,indicating that conidia were inactivated by tGNBP-2.However,GDL restored susceptibility to infection.Termites treated with GDL for 24h before infection showed accelerated mortality (Fig.4A ).GDL had no direct toxic effect on conidia themselves,as any inhibitory effect of fungal glu-canases is likely irrelevant before germination.Interestingly,GDL treatment also caused accelerated mortality even in the absence of active infection.This result is explained by postmor-tem analysis of dead termites from both GDL treatment groups.The analysis showed that termites were killed by M.anisopliae as well as by additional opportunistic pathogens,namely,Gram-negative bacteria,such as Serratia and Pseudomonas ,and fungi

(Fig.4B ,Fig.S4,and Fig.S5).Notably,these observations are unlikely to have resulted from inhibited feeding,because termite gut symbionts provide multiple pathways for polysaccharide utilization (33),many of which are not blocked by GDL (34).The different survival kinetics in the in vivo experiments (Figs.2D and 4A )are due to survivability variations among different Nasutitermes colonies used in this study.We are currently investigating potential factors affecting this variability.Conclusion

The strategy presented here is an alternative to toxic pesticides given that it is natural,nontoxic,and biodegradable.GDL and similar glycomimetics could potentially be engineered toward a field formulation with minimal adverse effects on surrounding ecosystems,for example,by using nanoparticles to immobilize them.Our strategy may not be limited to termites,because the glucanase activity of tGNBP-2appears to be shared by several pest species (16–18)as suggested by our sequence and structural analysis.A final interesting note,because GDL is a product of a biosynthetic pathway,plants could conceivably be engineered to produce it in high amounts and at specific

compartments,

Fig.3.GDL blocks pattern recognition and signaling by tGNBP-2.(A )Binding of tGNBP-2to pathogenic bacteria and fungi (Serratia marcescens ,Candida albicans ,Aspergillus fumigatus ,Metarhizium anisopliae variants 1and 2,putative M.anisopliae isolated from a dead insect,and Escherichia coli )compared with recombinant human CD14(rhCD14).IgG,isotype controls;tGNBP-2,tGNBP-2signal;rhCD14,recombinant human CD14signal.(B )A computational model of tGNBP-2(gray)with side chains interacting with ?(1,3)-D -glucan and eritoran (an LPS analog)colored as follows:red,acidic;brown,hydropohobic;blue,basic;light blue,Asn/Gln;magenta,Tyr.?(1,3)-D -glucan C atoms are green;eritoran C atoms are cyan.In both,O atoms are red,P atoms orange,and N atoms blue.(C )Dose–response inhibition of ?(1,3)-glucanase activity of tGNBP-2,termite lysate,or tGNBP-2-depleted lysate by GDL.(Inset )Zymogram of termite extract with GDL or a D -glucose control.(D )Inhibition of SAPK/JNK signaling in hemocytes by suppression of tGNBP-2measured by ?ow cytometry (G,granulocytes;M,monocytes;GDL,D -?-gluconolactone;n ?2,000)(Left ).GDL (20mM)blocks induction of tGNBP-2by laminarin challenge in termite cells,measured by Western blot (Right ).

Bulmer et al.

PNAS ?August 4,2009?vol.106?no.31?12655

A P P L I E D

B I O L O G I

C A L S C I E N C E

S

which would bolster their immunity to pest attacks.Glycomi-metic synthesis in this context could be optimized as to not interfere with future industrial utilization of plant carbohydrates as a non-fossil-fuel source.Materials and Methods

Study Species.N.corniger nests were collected in April of 2006from Gamboa in the Republic of Panama.The termites in their carton nests were maintained in plastic boxes at 28°C and 75%humidity and provided with birch wood and water ad libitum.

Bioinformatic Analysis.Insect GNBPs were identi?ed with BLAST search using Nasutitermes GNBPs (DQ058898–058922).Representative GNBPs were aligned with ClustalX (35).The phylogenetic tree was constructed by distance analysis with PAUP*version 4.0b10(36).The tree was rooted with protein sequence from B.circulans ?(1,3)-glucanase (AAC60453).One-thousand rep-licates were used to calculate bootstrap values,and branches were collapsed with a 50%consensus rule.

Termite Extracts,Tissue Samples,Cuticular Washes,and Hemocytes.N.corniger workers,large workers,or soldiers (whole termites or isolated tissues)were surface sterilized (5%hypochlorite followed by sterile water)and homoge-nized in acetate buffer (0.2M,pH 5.0,4?L per termite)with Biomasher columns (pore size 80–145?m;Cartagen)according to the manufacturer’s instructions.Cuticular washes were prepared in 0.1%Tween 80(10?L per worker).Wash samples were concentrated with a P10Microcon ?lter (Milli-pore).Hemocytes were isolated from 10chilled N.corniger workers (1?L per termite)as described (37).

Flow Cytometry.Hemocyte staining was performed essentially as described elsewhere (38).The antibodies used were:primary,anti-tGNBP-2(5?g/mL)or rabbit IgG (5?g/mL;Sigma);secondary antibody,anti-rabbit PE (1:400;In-vitrogen).Intracellular ?ow cytometry for protein phosphorylation was per-formed as described (38).The antibodies used were:primary,anti-phospho SAPK/JNK (Fig.S6,1:100;Cell Signaling);secondary,anti-rabbit ?uorescein (1:400;Invitrogen).Flow cytometry was performed on a Beckman-Coulter Cell Lab Quanta SC MPL ?ow cytometer.

?(1,3)-Glucanase Assays.?(1,3)-Glucanase activity was measured by a gel electrophoresis assay (39)and by a ?ow cytometric method (Fig.S7).Brie?y,samples were run on Carboxymethyl Curdlan Remazol Brilliant Blue (Loewe Biochemica)gel,and clearing zones representing foci of enzymatic activity were photographed.For ?ow cytometry,laminarin (Sigma)was labeled with rhodamine green-X succinyl ester (Invitrogen)as described (40)and adsorbed on 3.0-?m-diameter polystyrene microspheres (Polysciences)by a 3-h incuba-tion in carbonate/bicarbonate buffer (50mM,pH 9.6)at 37°C.Microspheres were then washed and reconstituted in sodium acetate (0.1M,pH 5.5).Samples were mixed with 1?L of the microsphere suspension,incubated for 15–30min at 37°C,and https://www.wendangku.net/doc/ad18717998.html,mercially available puri?ed ?(1,3)-glucanase from H.pomatia or B.subtilis was used at 0.1milliunits/mL as a positive control,and results were expressed as percentage activity of this control.

Antifungal Assays.M.anisopliae conidia were incubated with single insect extracts (or the equivalent of a single insect from extract prepared from 8–10pooled workers)in sodium acetate (50mM,pH 5.0)containing 0.025%Tween 80and 50?g of ampicillin (40?L of incubation mix included ?100conidia and crude extract corresponding with one termite).This mix was incubated for 18–24h at 25°C,then plated onto potato dextrose agar 100?15mm plates and supplemented with 50?g/mL ampicillin.CFUs were counted following a 4-day incubation at 25°C.Femtoliter changes in conidial cell volume were directly measured by ?ow cytometry.

Size-Exclusion HPLC.Extract from 30termites diluted 1:1in sodium acetate (0.1M,pH 5.5)was injected into a YMC Pack Diol 200column (300?8mm ID,particle size 5?m,pore size 20nm;YMC)and separated on an Agilent 1100Series instrument at 1mL/min.

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blots.Anti-tGNBP-2antibodies were raised in rabbits and puri?ed by standard methods (GenScript).Antibodies were covalently linked to 1.0-?m-diameter Dynabeads MyOne carboxylic-acid-functionalized magnetic beads (Invitrogen)according to the manufacturer’s instructions.Fresh termite extract was diluted 1:1with immunoprecipitation buffer (25mM Tris ?HCl,pH 7.6,150mM NaCl,1%vol/vol Nonidet P-40,and 1%vol/vol protease inhibitor mixture)and incubated with beads for at least 1h at room temperature.Beads were washed with immunoprecipitation buffer and eluted with a neutral pH buffer (Pierce).Eluate was desalted and con-centrated using a centrifugal column (Vivaspin 10K;Sartorius)and reconsti-tuted in sodium acetate (0.1M,pH 5.5).SDS/PAGE and Western blots were performed and developed by standard procedures;loading amounts were validated by bicinchoninic acid assay.Anti-tGNBP-2was used at 2.5?g/mL followed by anti-rabbit HRP (Cell Signaling)at 1:1,000.Soil samples A and B were collected from two different locations in Boston (Reticulitermes sp.inhabiting these locations exhibited positive ?(1,3)-glucanase activity).Homology-Based Structural Modeling of tGNBP-2.The template structure of an endo-?(1,3)-glucanase from alkaliphilic Nocardiopsis strain F96(PDB ID:2HYK)was chosen by the SWISS-MODEL auto-homology-modeling Web portal to construct a structural model for tGNBP-2.The binding of ?(1,3)-glucan was investigated by docking a representative ?(1,3)-glucan containing a tetrasac-charide obtained from its cocrystal structure with a Bacillus macerans endo-?(1,3)-glucanase (PDB ID:1U0A)to the active site containing the consensus ?(1,3)-glucanase sequence.The binding coordinates of eritoran (an LPS ana-log)were obtained from its cocrystal structure with Toll-like receptor 4/MD2complex (PDB ID:2Z65).

Combinatorial Cytotoxicity Mapping.Samples of M.anisopliae conidia in sodium acetate (0.1M,pH 5.5)were incubated in 384-well plates with samples from HPLC fractions (see Size-Exclusion HPLC )in different combinations (F1?F1,F1?F2,F1?F3,?,F2?F2,F2?F3,?,F3?F3,?;10?L of each fraction)overnight at 25°C and analyzed by ?ow cytometry.tGNBP-2was depleted from 250?L of each fraction as described in Immunoprecipitation and Western Blots .

In Vitro Binding Assays.Isolated tGNBP-2or rhCD14(R&D Systems)were linked to 3.0-?m-diameter polystyrene beads (Polysciences)by a 3-h incubation in boric acid (0.1M,pH 8.5),followed by 3washes in cold PBS containing 0.1%vol/vol rabbit serum.Formaldehyde-inactivated pathogenic strains were la-beled with FITC as previously described (41).Beads were incubated with labeled pathogens in buffer at 37°C for 30min and analyzed by ?ow

cytometry.

Fig.4.GDL suppresses termite antimicrobial defense.(A )Effect of gain or loss of tGNBP-2function on termites infected with Metarhizium anisopliae along the course of 12days (GDL,D -?-gluconolactone;mean of 2groups,n ?12/group;*,P ?0.05tGNBP-2treated conidia vs.other groups,P ?0.05GDL treated termites with untreated conidia vs.other groups,n.s.no signi?cant difference vs.no infection).(B )Postmortem analysis of dead termites from GDL treatment groups representing percentage of termites con?rmed to have been infected by microbial pathogens.Numbers above bars represent daily death count.

12656?https://www.wendangku.net/doc/ad18717998.html, ?cgi ?doi ?10.1073?pnas.0904063106Bulmer et

al.

In Vivo Pin-Prick Infection Assay.Ten workers were cooled on ice and pricked with a sterilized insect pin immersed in a solution of either M.anisopliae or S. marcescens.Termites were then released at room temperature for speci?c time intervals of1.5and2.5h.The experiment was terminated by extracting the termites and freezing the extract for analysis.

In Vivo Survival and Exposure Assays.Conidia(?3?107/mL)were centrifuged at12,000?g for1min and then suspended in600?L of0.1%Tween80by vortexing.Two groups of12large workers were exposed to?lter paper (Whatman5)moistened with these suspensions in35?15mm Petri dishes for 20h.The?lter paper was replaced with sterile water-moistened?lter paper, and dead termites were removed after a daily census of survivorship.tGNBP-2 treatment was performed with conidia suspended in a sample of the immu-noprecipitated protein overnight at25°C,followed by extensive washing in PBS containing0.1%Tween80.Dead termites were removed daily,surface sterilized with70%ethanol,and incubated in sterile plates at room temper-ature for4days for postmortem analysis.For exposure to laminarin or LPS,?lter papers were moistened with300?L of0.5or5mg/mL solutions of either carbohydrate.Termites were kept on moist?lter paper for24h before exposure with conidia(107/mL).Controls included termites that were not exposed to sugars,conidia,or both(0.1%Tween80).

Statistical Analysis and Significance of Survival Data.Data were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni cor-rections for multiple testing.Termite survival data were analyzed by Cox regression analysis.Data are presented as means?SD. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.We thank the administrators of the Smithsonian Trop-ical Research Institute(Republic of Panama)for use of their facilities and obtaining permits for the collection of termite colonies;Prof.R.H.Crozier for helpful comments on this paper;and all of the members of the R.B.R.and R.S. groups for discussions and technical assistance.This research was supported by National Science Foundation Career Development Grant DEB-0447316(to R.B.R.)and National Institutes of Health Grants GM57073(to R.S.).I.B.is a Novartis Postodoctoral Fellow of the Life Sciences Research Foundation.

1.Bischoff V,et al.(2004)Function of the drosophila pattern-recognition receptor

PGRP-SD in the detection of Gram-positive bacteria.Nat Immunol5:1175–1180.

2.Janeway CA,Jr,Medzhitov R(2002)Innate immune recognition.Annu Rev Immunol

20:197–216.

3.Lemaitre B,Nicolas E,Michaut L,Reichhart JM,Hoffmann JA(1996)The dorsoventral

regulatory gene cassette spatzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response in Drosophila adults.Cell86:973–983.

4.Dong Y,Taylor HE,Dimopoulos G(2006)AgDscam,a hypervariable immunoglobulin

domain-containing receptor of the Anopheles gambiae innate immune system.PLoS Biol4:e229.

5.Watson FL,et al.(2005)Extensive diversity of Ig-superfamily proteins in the immune

system of insects.Science309:1874–1878.

6.Bulmer MS,Crozier RH(2006)Variation in positive selection in termite GNBPs and

Relish.Mol Biol Evol23:317–326.

7.Jiggins FM,Kim KW(2006)Contrasting evolutionary patterns in Drosophila immune

receptors.J Mol Evol63:769–780.

8.Dimopoulos G,Richman A,Muller HM,Kafatos FC(1997)Molecular immune responses

of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae to bacteria and malaria parasites.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA94:11508–11513.

9.Keitel T,Simon O,Borriss R,Heinemann U(1993)Molecular and active-site structure of

a Bacillus1,3–1,4-?-glucanase.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA90:5287–5291.

10.Warr E,Das S,Dong Y,Dimopoulos G(2008)The Gram-negative bacteria-binding

protein gene family:Its role in the innate immune system of Anopheles gambiae and in anti-Plasmodium defence.Insect Mol Biol17:39–51.

11.Brown GD,Gordon S(2005)Immune recognition of fungal?-glucans.Cell Microbiol

7:471–479.

12.Royet J,Dziarski R(2007)Peptidoglycan recognition proteins:Pleiotropic sensors and

effectors of antimicrobial defences.Nat Rev Microbiol5:264–277.

13.Planas A,Juncosa M,Lloberas J,Querol E(1992)Essential catalytic role of Glu134in

endo-?-1,3–1,4-D-glucan4-glucanohydrolase from B.licheniformis as determined by site-directed mutagenesis.FEBS Lett308:141–145.

https://www.wendangku.net/doc/ad18717998.html,ler LR(1997)Systematics of the Australian Nasutiterminae with reference to evo-

lution within the Termitidae(Isoptera).PhD thesis(Austalian National University, Canberra,Australia).

15.Rosengaus RB,Moustakas JE,Calleri DV,Traniello JF(2003)Nesting ecology and

cuticular microbial loads in dampwood(Zootermopsis angusticollis)and drywood termites(Incisitermes minor,I.schwarzi,Cryptotermes cavifrons).J Insect Sci3:31. 16.Balasubramani V,Sayyed AH,Crickmore N(2008)Genetic characterization of resis-

tance to deltamethrin in Plutella xylostella(Lepidoptera:Plutellidae)from India.J Econ Entomol101:1911–1918.

17.Genta FA,Terra WR,Ferreira C(2003)Action pattern,speci?city,lytic activities,and

physiological role of?ve digestive?-glucanases isolated from Periplaneta americana.

Insect Biochem Mol Biol33:1085–1097.

18.Pauchet Y,Freitak D,Heidel-Fischer HM,Heckel DG,Vogel H(2009)Immunity or

digestion:Glucanase activity in a glucan-binding protein family from lepidoptera.

J Biol Chem284:2214–2224.

19.Lomer CJ,Bateman RP,Johnson DL,Langewald J,Thomas M(2001)Biological control

of locusts and grasshoppers.Annu Rev Entomol46:667–702.

20.Kim YS,et al.(2000)Gram-negative bacteria-binding protein,a pattern recognition

receptor for lipopolysaccharide and?-1,3-glucan that mediates the signaling for the induction of innate immune genes in Drosophila melanogaster cells.J Biol Chem 275:32721–https://www.wendangku.net/doc/ad18717998.html,beta MO,Landmann R,Obrecht JP,Obrist R(1991)Human B cells express membrane-

bound and soluble forms of the CD14myeloid antigen.Mol Immunol28:115–122. 22.Metheniti A,et al.(2003)Evidence for a LPS-binding protein in med?y hemocyte

surface:mediation in LPS internalization but not in LPS signaling.Arch Insect Biochem Physiol54:25–36.

23.Traniello JF,Rosengaus RB,Savoie K(2002)The development of immunity in a social

insect:evidence for the group facilitation of disease resistance.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:6838–6842.

24.Bulmer MS,Crozier RH(2004)Duplication and diversifying selection among termite

antifungal peptides.Mol Biol Evol21:2256–2264.

25.Da Silva P,et al.(2003)Solution structure of termicin,an antimicrobial peptide from the

termite Pseudacanthotermes spiniger.Protein Sci12:438–446.

https://www.wendangku.net/doc/ad18717998.html,mberty M,et al.(2001)Insect immunity.Constitutive expression of a cysteine-rich

antifungal and a linear antibacterial peptide in a termite insect.J Biol Chem276:4085–4092.

27.Park SW,Lawrence CB,Linden JC,Vivanco JM(2002)Isolation and characterization of

a novel ribosome-inactivating protein from root cultures of pokeweed and its mech-

anism of secretion from roots.Plant Physiol130:164–178.

28.Bilej M,et al.(2001)Distinct carbohydrate recognition domains of an invertebrate

defense molecule recognize Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.J Biol Chem 276:45840–45847.

29.Cianciotto N,Rappuoli R,Groman N(1986)Detection of homology to the beta

bacteriophage integration site in a wide variety of Corynebacterium spp.J Bacteriol 168:103–108.

30.Copa-Patino JL,Reyes F,Perez-Leblic MI(1989)Puri?cation and properties of a1,3-?-

glucanase from Penicillium oxalicum autolysates.FEMS Microbiol Lett53:285–291.

31.Pitson SM,Seviour RJ,McDougall BM,Stone BA,Sadek M(1996)Puri?cation and

characterization of an extracellular(136)-?-glucanase from the?lamentous fungus Acremonium persicinum.Biochem J316:841–846.

32.Sluss HK,et al.(1996)A JNK signal transduction pathway that mediates morphogenesis

and an immune response in Drosophila.Genes Dev10:2745–2758.

33.Warnecke F,et al.(2007)Metagenomic and functional analysis of hindgut microbiota

of a wood-feeding higher termite.Nature450:560–565.

34.de A Ximenes F,de Paula Silveira FQ,Filho EX(1996)Production of?-xylosidase activity

by Trichoderma harzianum strains.Curr Microbiol33:71–77.

35.Higgins DG,Thompson JD,Gibson TJ(1996)Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence

alignments.Methods Enzymol266:383–402.

36.Wilgenbusch JC,Swofford D(2003)Inferring evolutionary trees with PAUP*.Curr

Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter6:Unit6.4.

37.Rosengaus RB,Cornelisse T,Guschanski K,Traniello JF(2007)Inducible immune pro-

teins in the dampwood termite Zootermopsis angusticollis.Naturwissenschaften 94:25–33.

38.Irish JM,et al.(2004)Single cell pro?ling of potentiated phospho-protein networks in

cancer cells.Cell118:217–228.

39.Kalix S,Buchenauer H(1995)Direct detection of?-1,3-glucanase in plant extracts by

polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.Electrophoresis16:1016–1018.

40.Meunier F,Wilkinson KJ(2002)Nonperturbing?uorescent labeling of polysaccharides.

Biomacromolecules3:857–864.

41.Hartshorn KL,White MR,Crouch EC(2002)Contributions of the N-and C-terminal

domains of surfactant protein d to the binding,aggregation,and phagocytic uptake of bacteria.Infect Immun70:6129–6139.

Bulmer et al.PNAS?August4,2009?vol.106?no.31?12657A

P

P

L

I

E

D

B

I

O

L

O

G

I

C

A

L

S

C

I

E

N

C

E

S

福建省福州格致中学2014-2015学年高一上学期期中考试英语试题 Word版无答案

福州格致中学2014-2015学年第一学段 高一英语《必修一》模块考试 第二部分:英语知识运用 单项填空 从每题所给的A、B、C、D四个选项中,选出可以填入空白处的最佳答案,并在答题卡上将该选项涂黑。 21.In _______ distance is a tall tree which is said to have ______ history of over 500 years. A. the; a B. /; / C. a; a D. the; / 22.--- Look! The telephone is broken. Someone damaged it _______ purpose. --- That may be right. But perhaps it was broken ________ accident. A. on; on B. on; by C. by; by D. by; on 23.It might be very difficult to find _______ of the information. A. cause B. resource C. source D. course 24. Shall we go there by bus or by taxi? The ______ seems to be quicker. A. late B. latter C. later D. lately 25. After living in the United States for fifty years, he returned to the small town where he ______. A. brought up B. grew up C. gave up D. turned up 26. The engine of the ship was out of order and the bad weather ________ the helplessness of the crew(船员) at sea. A. added to B. added up to C. added up D. was added to 27. --- Daddy, I don’t want to go to Jimmy’s birthday. --- You had better go. ______ you make a promise, you have to keep it. A. Even B. Once C. Unless D. In case 28. --- Won’t you stay for lunch? --- No, thanks, I _______ my uncle at the airport at 10:30. A. met B. have met C. meet D. am meeting 29. ________ out for food, Some work in the nest as guards or workers. A. All the bees not go B. Both the bees don’t go C. Not all the bees go D. All the bees go 30. The old town has narrow streets and small houses _______ are built close to each other. A. they B. where C. what D. that 31. --- Don’t you know our town at all? --- No, It is the first time I _______ here. A. was B. am coming C. came D. have come 32. Can you make sure _____ the gold ring? A. where Alice had put B. where had Alice put C. where Alice has put D. where has Alice put 33. He decided to help the poor girl _______ were killed in the earthquake. A. which parents B. parents of them C. whose parents D. whom parents 34. The settlement is home to nearly to 1,000 people, many of _______ left their village homes for a better life in the city. A. whom B. which C. them D. who 35. ---We could invite John and Barbara to the Friday night party. --- Yes, _______ ? I’ll give them a call right now. A. why not B. what for C. why D. what 第二节完形填空(共20 小题;每小题一分,满分20分) 阅读下面短文,从短文后各题所给的四个选项(A,B,C,D)中选出可以填入相应空白处的最佳选项,并在答题卡上将该选项涂黑。 This little story I’m going to tell you happened when I was about 11 years old and I’II never forget it. I was at my friend Jenny’s __36__ after school one day, and we were doing (or not doing) homework.. __37__ I was there, Jenny’s mom came over to visit. I don’t remember her name__38__ what her face looked like. I just remember her hands, her voice and the__39__ she taught me. I can still see her hand __40__ for mine in our introduction. __41__ were so

新版质量管理体系样本

西咸新区沣河综合治理高压迁改工程 质量管理体系 编制人: 审核人: 审批人: 编制单位: 陕西秦电机电设备工程集团有限责任公司( 联合体) 编制日期: 月日 目录 一、工程概况 (1)

二、质量目标 (1) 三、质量管理组织机构、指挥系统 (1) 四、质量保证措施 (1) 五、质量监控系统、联络协调系统 (3) 六、项目部质量管理组织机构 (5) 七、质量管理生产目标 (5) 八、质量保证体系说明 (13) 九、质量管理制度 (13) 十、分项工程施工过程控制框图 (15) 十一、质量管理检查制度 (19) 十二、质量管理例会制度 (19) 十三、质量事故报告制度 (26)

工程概况 1、工程名称: 西咸新区沣河综合治理高压迁改工程设计施工总承包 2、建设地点: 丝路经济带能源金融贸易区内 3、工程计划工期 3.1设计工期: 37个日历天 3.2施工工期: 150日历天 4、( 1) 蓝马专线110KV电力迁改; ( 2) 仁陈小王庄支线10KV电力迁改; ( 3) 咸阳南污水厂10KV专线电力迁改。 二、质量目标 单位工程达到合格工程, 分项工程合格率100%, 优良率90%, 观感评 定得分率90%以上, 力争95%以上, 消灭质量事故。 三、质量管理组织机构、指挥系统 严格执行国家和各级有关部门颁布的技术质量法规, 建立以项目经理 为中心, 项目质量检验员全面负责的质量体系, 全面推行ISO9002《质量管理和质量保证体系》标准, 对工程进行质量目标管理和质量控制。 四、质量保证措施 3.1建立技术交底制度, 实行图纸交底, 施工阶段设计交底, 设计变更交底, 分部分项工程技术交底, 做到抓方案, 抓措施, 抓交底, 抓落实。 3.2抓住质量通病的防治, 对质量通病有防治措施, 并落实。 3.3质量”三工三检”制度, ”三工”即开工前交底, 工中检查, 工后验收评定; ”三检”及自检、互检、交接检。把质量管理做到”点、线、

英语选修六课文翻译Unit5 The power of nature An exciting job的课文原文和翻译

AN EXCITING JOB I have the greatest job in the world. I travel to unusual places and work alongside people from all over the world. Sometimes working outdoors, sometimes in an office, sometimes using scientific equipment and sometimes meeting local people and tourists, I am never bored. Although my job is occasionally dangerous, I don't mind because danger excites me and makes me feel alive. However, the most important thing about my job is that I help protect ordinary people from one of the most powerful forces on earth - the volcano. I was appointed as a volcanologist working for the Hawaiian V olcano Observatory (HVO) twenty years ago. My job is collecting information for a database about Mount Kilauea, which is one of the most active volcanoes in Hawaii. Having collected and evaluated the information, I help other scientists to predict where lava from the volcano will flow next and how fast. Our work has saved many lives because people in the path of the lava can be warned to leave their houses. Unfortunately, we cannot move their homes out of the way, and many houses have been covered with lava or burned to the ground. When boiling rock erupts from a volcano and crashes back to earth, it causes less damage than you might imagine. This is because no one lives near the top of Mount Kilauea, where the rocks fall. The lava that flows slowly like a wave down the mountain causes far more damage because it

【2019最新】高一英语上学期期末考试试题

【2019最新】高一英语上学期期末考试试题 高一英语试卷 第二部分阅读理解(共两节,满分40分) 第一节(共15小题:每小题2分,满分30分) 阅读下列短文,从每题所给的四个选项(A、B、C和D)中选出最佳选项,并在答题卡上将该项涂黑。 A Americans like to travel on vacations. Today more and more travelers in the United States are spending nights at small houses or inns instead of hotels. They get a room for the night and the breakfast for the next morning. Staying at a bed-and-breakfast inn is much different from staying at a hotel. Usually the cost is much less. Staying at an inn is almost like visiting someone’s hom e. The owners are glad to tell about the area and the interesting places to visit. Many vacationists say they enjoy the chance to meet local families. 21. Where do more and more travelers in the USA like spending nights? ________.

福建省福州格致中学高考英语备考听力训练二十五试题 含答案

25. 第一部分听力(共两节。满分30分) 第一节(共5小题;每小题l.5分,满分7.5分) 听下面5段对话。每段对话后有一个小题,从题中所给的A、B、C三个选项中选出最佳选项,并标在试卷的相应位置。听完每段对话后,你都有l0秒钟的时间来回答有关小题和阅读下一小题。每段对话仅读一遍。 1.What is the probable relationship between the speakers? A. Father and daughter. B. Doctor and patient. C. Teacher and student. 2.Why can’t the machine work according to the woman? A.The power may have been cut off. B.There is something wrong with it. C.Both of the speakers can’t operate it. 3.What does the woman mean? A She is tired of keeping pets. B She wants to have a dog. C She won’t have a dog as a friend. 4.What can we learn from the conversation? A.The man will invite Mary to dinner. B The man will buy his daughter a gift. C.Mary has a lovely girl. 5.Which of the following does the woman like best? A. Fishing.13.Swimming.C.Climbing. 第二节(共15小题;每小题l.5分,满分22.5分) 听下面5段对话或独白。每段对话或独自后有几个小题,从题中所给的A、B、C 三个选项中选出最佳选项,并标在试卷的相应位置。听每段对话或独白前,你将有时间阅读各个小题,每小题5秒钟;听完后,各小题将给出5秒钟的作答时间。每段对话或独自读两遍。 听第6段材料。回答第6,7题。 6.What season is it now? A Spring. B Summer. C Autumn. 7.What will the speakers do? A. Drive to San Diego. B.Have take—away food in the park. C. See an outdoor movie. 听第7段材料。回答第8,9题。 8.What color is the tie the man is looking for? A. Green. B. Blue. C. Brown.

质量管理手册范本

重庆公司质量手册200 年月日

目录 0企业概况 1.质量管理职责 1.1组织领导 1.1.1组织结构图 1.1.2任命书 1.1.3管理手册发布令 1.1.4 关于设立质管科的决定 质管科职责和权限 1.1.5相关记录 1.2质量目标 1.3管理职责 1.3.1质量管理制度 1.3.2部门职责、权限及考核办法 1.3.3岗位职责 1.3.4不合格品的控制管理办法 1.3.5 相关记录 a《不合格报告》 b《纠正措施处理单》 2.生产资源提供 2.1生产场所 2.1.1 企业区位图 2.1.2生产布局平面示意图

2.1.3 防尘、防鼠、防蝇控制管理办法2.1.4生产车间卫生管理制度 2.1.5相关记录 《卫生检查表》 2.2生产设备 2.2.1设施、设备卫生管理制度 2.2.2管道、设备清洗消毒管理制度2.2.3设备和容器清洁控制程序 2.2.4相关记录 a《设施设备清单》 b《保养、检修、维护计划》 c《保养、检修、维护记录》 2.3人员要求 2.3.1岗位人员任职要求 2.3.2人员健康卫生控制管理制度 2.3.3 相关记录 a《员工登记表》 b《人员培训记录》 3.技术文件管理 3.1技术标准 3.1.1相关记录 a《标准清单》 3.2工艺文件 3.2.1工艺流程图

3.2.2工艺作业指导书 3.3文件管理 3.3.1技术性文件管理制度 3.3.2相关记录 a《文件清单》 b《文件借阅、发放、回收记录》 c《记录清单》 4.采购质量控制 4.1采购制度 4.1.1采购管理制度 4.2采购文件 4.2.1采购原材料的管理办法 4.2.2采购合同 4.2.3食品添加剂的使用规定 4.2.4相关记录 a《合格供方名录》 b《采购计划》 c《采购清单》 4.3采购验证 4.3.1相关记录 a《原辅材料进货验证记录汇总表》b《原辅材料验证记录》 c《原辅材料不合格处理单》 d《包装物进货验证记录汇总表》

【新课标版】高一英语上学期期末考试

2012-2013学年度上学期期末考试 高一英语试题【新课标】 说明:本试题满分150分,所有答案填写在答题卷上。写在其它地方无效。 第一部分:听力(共三节,满分30分) 第一节(共5小题;每小题1.5分,满分7.5分) 听下面一段对话,回答第1小题。 1.How did the girl get to school this morning? A.On foot.B.By bus.C.In a car. 听下面一段对话,回答第2小题。 2.Who has been fooled? A.Sue.B.Bob.C.Nobody. 听下面一段对话,回答第3小题。 3.Are the keys in the backpack? A.No, they aren’t.B.Yes, they are.C.We don’t. 听下面一段对话,回答第4小题。 4.What kind of party will they have? A.A money-raising party.B.A birthday party.C.A costume(服装) party. 听下面一段对话,回答第5小题。 5.Why did the girl cook herself? A.Because she likes cooking. B.Because she came back home late. C.Because she wanted to help her parents. 第二节(共11小题;每小题1.5分,满分16.5分) 听下面一段对话,回答第6和第8三个小题。 6.What’s the woman’s favouite hobby? A.Bowling.B.Collecting coins.C.Boating. 7.What countires has the woman been to? A.Canada and China.B.Mexico and America.C.Japan and Canada. 8.Why doesn’t the man have a hobby? A.Because he is too lazy. B.Because he has to wok outside in the garden. C.Because his work takes up too much of his spare time. 听下面一段对话,回答第9至第11三个小题。 9.What do you think the woman’s job is? A.A truck driver.B.A policeman.C.A journalist(新闻记者). 10.When did the car accident happen? A.Around half to seven. B.While the man was waiting for the green light. C.When the man was passing the crossing.

福建省福州格致中学(鼓山校区)高一英语上学期第五次月考(期末)试题

福州格致中学2015级高一学段第一学期质量评定 高一年级第五次月考英语试卷 时间:100分钟分值120分 ★祝考试顺利★(完型填空启用备用卷题号不同答题卡区域注意区别) 第Ⅰ卷选择题(共两部分,满分70分) 第一部分阅读理解(共两节,满分40分) 第一节、完形填空(共20小题;每小题1.5分,满分30分) 阅读下面短文,从短文后所给各题的四个选项(A、B、C和D)中,选出可以填入空白处的最佳选项。 Most of us are highly aware of various channels through which we can obtain information on food safety. A majority of us have shown much __36___ in experts and authorities and taken a(n) __37___ part in science activities organized by such experts. __38_, we do not always form an accurate picture When there is __39_news about one brand, our trust in all brands or similar products tends to be __40___ . We would doubt not only the brand in __41___ but also similar brands when a safety issue (问题)_42___ in the news. At the same time,our purchase __43___ change as food safety incidents occur. We are becoming _44___ confident in domestic(国内的)food companies ,for they have done too little in publishing and sharing food safety __45__ so far. As a result ,we would turn to __46__ brands more often. Food safety incidents in China have attracted a lot of attention. As a matter of fact ,we only have a very _47__ knowledge base on the issue. In developed countries,there have been relatively _48__ measures and response system toward safety issues. Therefore, the __49___ in those countries are less likely to become over-panicked and form serious _50 about all brands. Food companies should pay more attention to our insights, listen to our voices, _51___ the opinions of experts and authorities ,have effective strategies for response _52____ various media channels, and __53___ information in time and face the public honestly. In addition ,both the government and an independent third - party should have a role to play in providing information about food companies__54___ in raw material selection, production and distribution (流通) However, this might require several years and we still need to learn more about food __55___ 36. A. respect B.enthusiasm C. distrust D. confidence 37. A. slight B. broad C. active D. natural 38. A. However B. Consequently C. Meanwhile D. Furthermore 39. A. negative B. exciting C. detailed D. special 40. A. protected B. affected C. increased D. preserved

2015版质量管理体系手册(范本)

XXXX包装材料有限公司 质量管理体系手册 (符合GB/T19001-2015 idt ISO9001:2015标准) 文件编号: 编制:XX 审核:XX 批准:XX

2016年6月1日发布2016年6月1日实 施 发布令 为提升公司质量管理水平,更好地为顾客提供优质产品和服务,提高顾客满意度,学习并应用国际先进的管理标准,本公司建立了系统化、文件化的质量管理体系。本手册参照GB/T19001-2015 idt ISO9001:2015标准的要求起草,规定了公司质量管理体系的要求。对内是公司最高的强制性工作要求;对外是关于公司质量管理体系的说明。 要求全体员工必须严格贯彻执行。特此发布。 董事长: XX 2016年6月1日 任命书 为了贯彻执行GB/T19001-2015 idt ISO9001:2015标准的要求,加强对质量管理体系的领导和日常管理,特任命XXX 同志兼任公司管理者代表,任命陈燕兼任质量管理体系专员。 管理者代表的主要职责是代表董事长全面建设、领导和管理公司的质量管理体系并承担与质量管理体系相关的外联工作,具体包括: a)确保公司的质量管理体系持续符合国际标准的要求; b)确保质量管理体系各项工作获得预期的绩效; c)在公司内部通报质量管理体系的绩效及改进机会,特别是向董事长报告; d)确保在整个公司推动以顾客为关注焦点; e)确保在策划和实施质量管理体系变更时保持其完整性。 质量管理体系专员的主要职责是承担质量管理体系日常运行的策划、指挥、执行、监督、改进等具体工作,辅助管理者代表履行好职责。 公司各职能、部门可推荐骨干成员参与质量管理体系的建设和改进工作,成立质量管理体系推进小组,小组成员由管理者代表任命并由体系专员领导日常工作。 董事长:XX

高一英语上学期期中试题(新版)新人教版

2019级高一上学期期中考试 英语试题 2018年11月本试卷分第I卷(选择题)和第II卷(非选择题)两部分,共12页。满分150分,考试时间120分钟。考试结束后,将答题卡和答题纸一并交回。答卷前,考生务必将自己的姓名、准考证号、考试科目填涂在答题卡和答题纸规定的地方。 第I卷(选择题,共100分) 第一部分:听力(共两节, 满分30分) 第一节(共5小题,每小题1.5分,满分7.5分) 听下面5段话对话。每段对话后有一个小题,从题中所给的A,B,C 三个选项中选出最佳选项,并标在试卷的相应位置。听完每段对话后,你都有10秒钟的时间来回答有关小题和阅读下一小题。每段对话仅读一遍。 1.What is probably the woman ? A.A doctor B. A taxi driver C. A policewoman 2. What’s the matter with the woman’s husband A. He is having a serious headache. B.There is something wrong with his leg. C.He was knocked down by an ambulance. 3. What does the man think of the newest Readers? A. Just so-so. B.Wonderful. C. Dull. 4. How old is Mary now? A.Twenty. B.Twenty-eight. C.Thirty. 5. Where does the conversation probably take place? A.In the hospital B.In a supermarket C.In a coffee bar. 第二节(共15小题;每小题1.5分,满分22.5分) 听下面5段话或独白。每段对话和独白后有几个小题,从题中所给的A,B,C三个选项中选出最佳选项,并标在试卷的相应位置。听每段对话和独白前,你将有时间阅读各个小题,每小题5秒钟,听完后,各小题将给出5秒时间作答。每段对话或独白读两遍。 听第6段材料,回答第6,7题。 6.How does the girl feel at first? A.Nervous. B.Confident? C.Relaxed. 7. When will the English speech contest start? A.At 2:00pm. B.At 3:00pm. C.At 5:00pm. 听第7段材料,回答第8, 9题。 8. What does the woman think of the man’s plan for the weekend?

质量管理体系总结模板

质量管理体系总结模板 任何单位和个人在开展工作时都有自己一套不同于别人的方法,写总结时要认真分析、比较,写出自己的特色。有些单位或个人的总结“几年一贯制”,内容差不多,只是换了某些数字,这样的总结就缺乏价值。 篇一:质量管理体系总结模板1、什么是ISO9000? ISO是国际标准化组织的简称.是国际标准化领域中一个十分重要的组织.ISO9000标准是一个系统性的标准,涉及的范围、内容广泛.可以针对不同的组织,实施质量管理。在组织系统内部.明确各部门的职责权限.强调计划和协调.使企业能行之有效地、有秩序地开展各项活动.保证生产经营活动的顺利进行。ISO9001质量管理体系标准.是对从设计开发到生产、安装及服务等全过程提出的要求,适用于出版社的管理、经营活动。对稳定和提高产品及服务质量、改善内部管理、降低管理成本、增强市场竞争力具有重要作用。我们应将ISO9001质量管理体系引入出版流程.制定出符合出版社特点的流程管理体系.以及保证企业持续改进、不断满足顾客需求的纲领。出版社生产经营的终极目标.就是要通过不断满足读者的需求.得到企业效益的最大化。ISO9000族正是基于企业行为管理的理念.满足企业需要. 2、质量管理的理论与实践发展的产物 随着质量管理的理论与实践的发展,许多国家和企业为

了保证产品质量,选择和控制供应商,纷纷制定国家或公司标准,对公司内部和供方的质量活动制定质量体系要求,产生了质量保证标准。 3、国际贸易的迅速发展的产物 随着国际贸易的迅速发展,为了适应产品和资本流动的国际化趋势,寻求消除国际贸易中技术壁垒的措施,ISO/TC176组织各国专家在总结各国质量管理经验的基础上,制定了ISO 9000系列国际标准。 4、四个核心标准: ISO9000《质量管理体系基础和术语》; ISO9001《质量管理体系要求》; ISO9004《质量管理体系业绩改进指南》; ISO19011《质量和环境管理体系审核指南》。 通过对质量管理体系的的学习,我认识到质量是成功的伙伴,贯标是质量的保障。如今,贯彻标准已被众多企业所看重,成为企业证明自己产品质量、工作质量的一种护照。有专家认为,贯标为广大企业完善管理、提高产品和服务质量提供了科学指南,同时为企业走向市场找到了共同语言。随着市场化进程的不断深入,各行各业将加快推进国际标准化进程,贯标变得更加迫切。毋庸置疑,贯标不是万金油,不能包治百病,但通过贯标,增强了企业全体员工的质量意识与管理意识,明确了各项管理的职责和工作的程序,促使企业的管理工作由人治转向法治,真正做到了凡事有人负责、

2020学年高一英语上学期期末考试试题(新版)新人教版

阜蒙县第二高中2017--2018学年度上学期高一期末考试 英语试卷 时间:100分钟总分:150分 第一部分:阅读理解(共两节,满分40分) 第一节(共15小题;每小题2分,满分30分) A A teenager needs to have a sense of independence in their life to feel secure (安全的). To some teenagers independence means a lot to them, and I think that some parents don’t allow their teenagers enough independence. Independence has something to do with freedom. Some kids are not allowed to go anywhere alone, and the only thing their schedule includes is going to school, coming home, going to sleep, and repeating the process the next day. Parents tend to be afraid that their kids can get hurted if they go outside into the world. But if parents control their kids too much, they may never learn to live on their own. The best way for a teenager to learn lesson is through experience. I think it is beneficial for teenagers to have freedom. Teenagers’ lack of freedom can also stop them from having good friendship at school. Some might say that this is a good thing, because it helps them focus more on their school work. I argue that this can only discourage them not to do their school work. Some parents do not allow their children to be around their friends outside the school, thinking that this will get them into trouble. But I don’t think so. Instead, isn’t this a good reason for parents to get their children a cellphone? Cellphones allow teenagers to stay in touch with their parents, and communicate better with their friends. Privacy is another issue between parents and their teenagers. Teenagers tend to enjoy relaxation by themselves in their own room. This also gives them a sense of independence. It often annoys teenagers when their parents enter their room when they are not home. I know that my mom always goes in m y room when I’m not home, and this has brought me to the point where I have asked many times to get a lock on my door. 1. What is the main idea of the second paragraph? A. Kids know how to live independently. B. Some parents allow their kids no freedom. C. It benefits teenagers to have freedom. D. Kids have a dull routine every day 2. In the opinion of the author, ___________. A. parents should make it easy for kids to communicate with their friends B. good friendships between kids harm their school work C. it is unnecessary for a kid to have a cellphone D. kids should focus on the school work 3. How do teenagers usually feel when their parents enter their rooms in their absence?

质量管理体系范本(DOC 53页)

质量管理体系范本(DOC 53页)

浙江省台州市X X X X X X X有限公司 质量管理体系 (依据ISO9001:2015) 文件编号:QM-01 版本:A/0 编制: 审核: 批准: 分发号: 持有部门: 控制状态:

0 目录 1 范围 2 规范性引用文件 3 术语和定义 4 组织的背景 4.1 理解组织及其背景 4.2 理解相关方的需求和期望 4.3 质量管理体系范围的确定 4.4 质量管理体系 5 领导作用 5.1 领导作用和承诺 5.2 质量方针 5.3 组织的作用、职责和权限 6 策划 6.1 风险和机遇的应对措施 6.2 质量目标及其实施的策划 6.3 变更的策划 7 支持 7.1 资源 7.2 能力 7.3 意识 7.4 沟通 7.5 形成文件的信息 8 运行 8.1 运行的策划和控制 8.2 市场需求的确定和顾客沟通 8.3 运行策划过程 8.4 外部供应产品和服务的控制 8.5 产品和服务开发 8.6 产品生产和服务提供 8.7 产品和服务放行

8.8 不合格产品和服务 9 绩效评价 9.1 监视、测量、分析和评价 9.2 内部审核 9.3 管理评审 10 持续改进 10.1 不符合和纠正措施 10.2 改进 1范围 企业依据ISO9001:2015标准要求建立并保持质量管理体系,制定质量方针和目标,运用过程方法及各过程的输入、输出、管理职责、工作要求、绩效考核,并使其文件化。通过对质量管理体系全过程的管理,遵守法律法规和其他相关要求,以证实本公司具有不断提高顾客满意度和持续改进质量管理体系及产品质量水平的能力。 2 规范性引用文件 ISO9000:2015 质量管理体系基础和术语 3 术语和定义 本标准采用ISO9000:2015 中所确立的术语和定义。 4 组织的背景环境 4.1 理解组织及其背景环境 理解组织及其背景环境—过程分析乌龟图 企业外部宗旨:为汽车相关顾客提供优质低廉的塑件、高精耐用的模具; 企业内部宗旨:为员工提供家庭一样的安稳舒适的工作条件; 企业战略方向:丰富自我,发展企业,贡献社会。 公司简介 公司位于中国塑料模具之乡——台州市黄岩,公司所在地北依宁波,南靠温州,是中国沿海最有经济活力城市之一,海、陆、空

高一英语上学期期末测试(含答案)

高一英语期末检测试题 本试卷分第I卷(选择题)和第II卷(非选择题)。第I卷1至8页,第II卷9至10页。满分150分,考试时间120分钟。考试结束后,将第II卷和答题卡一并交回。 第I卷(共105分) 注意事项: 1.答第I卷前,考生务必将自己的姓名、考号、考试科目涂写在答题卡上。 2.每小题选出答案后,用2B铅笔把答题卡上对应题号的答案标号涂黑。如需改动,用橡皮擦干净以后,再选涂其他答案标号。不能答在试题卷上。 第一部分听力(共两节,满分30分) 做题时,先将答案标在试卷上。录音内容结束后,你将有两分钟的时间将试卷上的答案转涂到答题卡上。 第一节(共5小题;每小题1.5分,满分7.5分) 听下面5段对话。每段对话后一个小题,从题中所给的A、B、C三个选项中选出最佳选项,并标在试卷的相应位置。听完每段对话后,你都有10秒钟的时间来回答有关小题和阅读下一小题。每段对话仅读一遍。 听下面5段对话。每段对话仅读一遍。 1. What will the man have for breakfast? A. Eggs. B. Bread. C. Coffee. 2. Why does the man visit the woman? A. To say sorry to the woman. B. To borrow some milk. C. To help cook the meal. 3. What is the man doing? A. Asking the way. B. Helping the woman. C. Working in an office. 4. What is the time now? A. 4:45. B. 5:00. C. 5:30. 5. What does the man offer to do? A. Drive for the woman. B. Find a parking lot. C. Carry the boxes for the woman. 第二节(共15小题;每小题1.5分,满分22.5分) 听下面5段对话。每段对话后有几个小题,从题中所给的A、B、C三个选项中选出最佳选项,并标在试卷的相应位置。听每段对话前,你将有时间阅读各个小题,每小题5秒钟;听完后,各小题给出5秒钟的作答时间。每段对话读两遍。 听第6段材料,回答第6至7题。 6. Which of the following does the man like? A. Fish. B. Tea. C. Coffee. 7. What is the woman’s attitude towards the man? A. Cold. B. Friendly. C. Careful.

相关文档
相关文档 最新文档