英语辩论赛技巧(外研社辩论赛思辨和语言训练)

英语辩论赛技巧（外研社辩论赛思辨和语言训练）

Introduction About Debate

MATTER 素材

1. ‘Matter’ relates to the issues in debate, the case being presented and the material used to substantiate argumentation.

2. The issues under debate should be correctly prioritized (by teams) and ordered (by individuals), dealing with the most important/pertinent first.

3. Matter should be logical and well reasoned.

4. Matter should be relevant, both to the issue in contention and the cases being advanced.

5. Matter should be persuasive.

wNo ‘new matter’ is to be introduced during Reply Speeches. The Reply Speech presents teams with an opportunity to focus on the major issue(s) in the debate and the way in which both teams approach that ‘point of Clash’. The Reply Speech should also give an ‘optimistic overview’ of the general approach to the debate by both sides and focus on the relative merits of the case by the side Replying, and the relative weaknesses in the case of the opposing team.

wAll speakers should develop ‘positive matter’ in advancing their respective cases. While an Opposition team may win by demonstrating that the Government has not proved the motion true, they should not rely purely on their rebuttal of the Government case and will likely benefit from presenting positive matter in opposition to the motion.

MANNER 辩论风格

a) Vocal Style: Volume, clarity, pronunciation, pace, intonation, fluency, confidence, and authority.

b) Language: Conversational.

c) Use of notes: Should not distract, should not be read.

d) Eye Contact: With audience.

e) Gesture: Natural, appropriate.

f) Sincerity: Believability.

g) Personal Attacks: (derogatory comments are not to be tolerated).

h) Humor: Effectiveness, appropriateness.

METHOD 辩论方法

The major influence on an adjudicator must be: ‘Is the speaker’s and team’s Method EFFECTIVE in advancing the case?’

a) Organization: The structuring of individual arguments and ordering of collective arguments

in the speeches .

b) Issue Selection: The identification of relevant points of clash in the round.

c) Perspective: The ability to explain the relevance of individual arguments to the motion being argued.

d) Refutation: The willingness and ability to engage and critique the points offered by the opposing team.

e) Teamwork: The degree to which the members of a team work together to collectively advance a strategy.

How to Choose Motions?

Prioritization of 3 Motions Given Based on:

a) Knowledge Resource of Team members

How much do we know of this issue?

b) Debating Positions of Your Team

What advantage will we have with this motion as Government/Opposition team?

c) Knowledge of Opposing Team’s status

What are the strengths/weaknesses of our Opponents in this debate?

Case Construction involves:

Defining the Motion & Creating Arguments that support it:

Defining the Motion means

a) Clearly stating meanings of “key terms”

E.g. “This House believes that professional athletes are good role models for Chinese youth.”

b) Establish Team Line (Base Line) & Split:

Motion

(THBT the world is a global village)

Team Line/Base Line/Stance

Because of the existence of interdependence and common interest

Spilt/Case Division

This is true in the a) social arena, b) geopolitical realm and c) economic sphere

c) Creating Arguments that support it

wPrioritize the Arguments with the strongest presented first to prove global interdependence and growing common interest:

wArgument 1 (1stSpeaker)

wSocial Arena --evidence, case studies, statistics, trend analysis, etc

wArgument 2 (1stSpeaker)

wGeopolitics --ditto

wArgument 3 (2ndSpeaker)

wGlobal Economics --ditto

w3rd Speakers must not carry new arguments

Setting Opposition Case

wProposing “Status Quo”

“Why change when things are fine now …”

wOffering a “Counter Proposal”

“Our plan works better than yours ….’

wProvide “Positive Objections”

“Yours does not work and will be harmful to…”

w** Oppn needs to have team line, split, prioritized arguments in 1stand 2ndSpeakers too! Refutation Strategies

wWhat are Rebuttals?

Arguments raised in response to Oppn’s arguments. Comprises analysis of why Oppn is wrong, is consistent with own case, as well support/reinforce own team line

wHow to do it?

State what argument is rebutted, explain flaw(s) in argument, support it with evidence. examples, case studies, and finally linking it relevantly to your side of the topic.

Rebutting Parts of Arguments

w1. Factual Error: Your argument is factually wrong

“Your statistics/example/case studies are wrong because ….”

w2. Your argument is not supported by any evidence

“You merely asserted that ... without providing any relevant examples…”

w3.The consequences of your argument are not acceptable (morally, socially, etc)

w“How could you ban smoking in pubs when it violates the right of the smoker and his friends to socialize together …”

w4.Not Important: Your argument is correct but has little weight in this debate

w“Your policy helps on the minority, the smokers, but what about the majority of the non-smokers who have to inhale second-hand smoke in pubs …”

w5.Your argument is illogical –the conclusions do not follow from the premises

w“You claim that banning cigarette advertisements on TV will cause more young people to smoke as it makes smoking more mysterious and enticing, like a forbidden fruit, but I submit to you that the opposite is more likely to be true: banning a steady stream of advertisements depicting smoking as glamorous/attractive will REDUCE the number of young people who smoke.”

w6. Not Relevant/Irrelevant:

w“The fact that smoking causes cancer is not relevant to this debate because the issue at hand is the right of individual citizens to make informed choices concerning their own personal health ….”

w7. Contradiction in Opponents’ Arguments

wPoint out that the speakers/team are not clear about their own case. To be able to catch the opponents contradicting themselves requires good tracking skills, that is, skills in good note-taking and Active Listening.

w8. Failure to perform roles/responsibilities declared

wPM: “ To totally destroy the Opposition and win today’s debate, the Government will do the following 3 things:

wshow that women are stronger than men

wshow that women are smarter than men

wshow that women are wiser leaders than men

wto prove that women are true heroes of the New Millennium.”

wTo damage the opponents, point out their failure to cover the areas they promised to go over in the PM’s speech.

Rebutting the Case as a Whole

wTo break down the case of the opponents, it is not enough to rebut each/all/random arguments put forth by them.

wWinning a debate will require you to systematically break down a team’s case.

Here are the questions/points to consider

w1 What is their approach to the case? Is it flawed? Why?

w2 What tasks did they set themselves? Did they address them? What problems are there in the way they address them?

w3 What is the general emphasis of the case? What assumptions are made? Can they be refuted? w4 What are the key arguments of the other side? How can they be shown to be flawed?

w5.Focus on identifying the key issues/arguments which are used to support the case of the opponents and then systematically breaking them down by showing that they cannot stand up to scrutiny.

w**Do not try to shoot down all examples/arguments as there will not be enough time, and is unsystematic.

Point of Information（POI）

wPOIs are comments made by members directed at the speech of

wthe member holding the floor; POI should be brief, pertinent and

wpreferably witty. Points of order and points of personal privilege

ware prohibited.

Offering & Responding to Points of Information (POIs)

wA POI can be a Question or a Statement/Clarification/Contradiction and should not take more than 15 seconds

wEach Speaker is strongly encourage toAccept at least 2POIs

wAll team members should try to give POIs without being disruptive

How POIs offered are judged

w1.The threat they pose to the strength of the argument of the debater,

w2.Value of its wit and humour

How POIs taken are judged

w1.Promptness and Confidence in answering

w2.Strength of the Response

w3.Value of wit and humour

“please answer my question”“my dear friend”

wWe think this is tremendous waste of your words by always saying “my dear friends”, “please answer my questions” so bluntly.

考核要求及标准

w辩论技巧：辩手语言是否流畅，说理、分析是否透彻，反驳和应变能力是否强，说服力和逻辑性是否强。

w内容：论点和论据内容是否正确、充实，引用资料和实例是否恰当。

w风度和幽默感：辩手的表情、动作是否恰当，是否有风度及幽默感。

w自由辩论：各队在自由辩论中的识辩能力、说明能力和逻辑性是否强，接句是否合适，回答是否中肯，反

驱是否有力、有理，反应是否机敏，用语是否得体。

w整体合作：全队各辩手的论点是否一致，结构是否完整，队员之间的配合、合作是否默契。

w个人表现：全队每个辩手的参与度如何，全队辩手的整体实力是否强。

附：上交辩论素材形式模版

Topic：World Governments Should Conduct Serious Campaigns Against Smoking

The argument : key words

1. Definite link: smoking and bronchial troubles, heart disease, lung cancer.

2. Governments hear, see, smell, no evil.

3. A few governments: timid measures.

4. E.g. Britain: TV advertising banned; nation’s conscience appeased; cancerous death.

5. Official reactions to medical findings: lukewarm.

6. Tobacco: source of revenue. E. g. Britain: tobacco tax pays for educations.

7. A short- sighted policy.

8. Enormous sums spent fighting the disease; lives lost.

9. Smoking should be banned altogether.

10. We are not ready for such drastic action.

11. But governments, if really concerned, should conduct aggressive anti-smoking campaigns.

12. The tobacco industry spends vast sums on advertising.

13. Advertising: insidious, dishonest.

14. Never shown pictures of real smokers coughing up lungs, only virile young men.

15. Smoking associated with great open-air life, beautiful girls, togetherness, Nonsense!

16. All advertising should be banned; anti-smoking campaign conducted.

17. Smoking should be banned in public places.

18. Young people should be warned, dire consequences.

19. Warning, death’s head, included in every packet.

20. Governments should protect us from ourselves.

The counter-argument key words

1. There are still scientists who doubt smoking / cancer link.

2. People who don’t smoke should keep quiet.

3. Smoking brings many psychological benefits:

4. Relieves stresses of everyday life: provides constant consolation.

5. E. g. we smoke when taking exams, worried, bereaved, etc.

6. Associated with good living; social contacts made easier.

7. Smoking is very enjoyable: relaxing, e.g. with a cup of coffee; after a meal, etc.

8. It’s absurd to suggest we ban it after so many hundreds of years.

9. Enormous interests involved: governments, tobacco growers, tobacco industries, retail businesses.

10. Tax apart, important source of income to many countries: e.g. USA, Rhodesia, Greece, Turkey.

11. People should be free to decide, not bullied by governments; banning is undemocratic.

12. The tobacco industry spends vast sums on medical research.

13. Improved filters have resulted; e.g. Columbia University.

14. Now possible to smoke and enjoy it without danger.

6.11 语言反应训练

英语绕口令训练

1. A big black bug bit a big black bear, made the big black bear bleed blood.

2. A flea and a fly flew up in a flue. Said the flea, "Let us fly!" Said the fly, "Let us flee!" So they flew through a flaw in the flue.

3. A tidy tiger tied a tie tighter to tidy her tiny tail.

4. A writer named Wright was instructing his little son how to write Wright right. He said: "It is not right to write Wright as 'rite'---try to write Wright aright!"

5. Betty Botter had some butter, "But," she said, "this butter's bitter. If I bake this bitter butter, it would make my batter bitter. But a bit of better butter -- that would make my batter better."

6. Bill's big brother is building a beautiful building between two big brick blocks.

7. He thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees the ghosts.

8. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, and chuck as much wood as a woodchuck would if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

9. I thought a thought. But the thought I thought wasn't the thought I thought

I thought.

10. If you notice this notice you will notice that this notice is not worth noticing.

11. If a shipshape ship shop stocks six shipshape shop-soiled ships, how many shipshape shop-soiled ships would six shipshape ship shops stock?

12. Sarah sitting in her sitting room, all she does is sits and shifts, all she does is sits and shifts.

13. She sells seashells by the sea shore. The shells she sells are surely seashells. So if she sells shells on the seashore, I'm sure she sells seashore shells.

14. Three gray geese in the green grass grazing. Gray were the geese and green was the grass.

15. While we were walking, we were watching window washers wash Washington's windows

with warm washing water.

16. A Finnish fisher named Fisher failed to fish any fish one Friday afternoon and

finally he found out a big fissure裂缝in his fishing-net.

17. Where is the watch I put in my pocket to take to the shop because it had stopped?

18. Mr. Cook said to a cook: "Look at this cook-book. It's very good." So the cook took the advice of Mr. Cook and bought the book.

19. How much dew would a dewdrop drop if a dewdrop could drop dew?

20. Sandy sniffed sweet smelling sunflower seeds while sitting beside a swift stream.

英语单词描述训练

目的：锻炼学生的语言表达能力、接受能力和理解能力

television；fridge；policeman；umbrella；doctor；housewife；taxi；subway；red；black；blue；cup；flower；……

故事接龙

目的：锻炼学生用英语思维、组织语言、表达思想的能力

? One day, I saw a girl on a bus...

? The animals in the forest are holding a meeting...

? I saw a woman in a car accident...

用所给词汇讲故事

目的：锻炼学生的反应能力、逻辑能力、和语言表达能力

? flower, butterfly, cry

? frog, cloud, horse

? boy, death, laugh

? TV, president, writer

个人对抗辩论赛辩题

1. If I were the Dean of Foreign Languages Department…

2. Planes, Cars, bicycles, or on foot, which do you prefer?

3. If I were a reporter, I’d like to cover entertainment news, international news, domestic news, or documentaries.

4. If I were a writer, I would focus on … in my novels in this Wenchuan Earthquake.

辩论赛和辩论两者的参评标准是不一样的

辩论赛是三方的事：正方，反方还有裁判。我们说一个队伍赢了是因为裁判说他们赢了（裁判判罚无法改变），然而裁判评判过程当中会综合的考虑到各种因素：双方论点的厉害程度；某方观点能否击倒对方；两

人配合是否默契；时间分配是否合理；辩手自身的口才；裁判个人的情感主观因素......我们自己作为辩手

的并不希望对方能够接受我们的观点，而是期盼能打动裁判。为了获取最终的胜利，我们可以使用语言当中

的各种技巧，心理学中的技巧等等。

辩论，是两方的事。它的评判标准是谁的方案（观点）更能够符合事实，更能解决问题谁就获胜（这是理论上的），它的评判是相当客观的。实际中辩论的结果也是多种多样：一胜一负；双方各有道理，博采众长，

采用两者结合的优化方案－－双赢；两者皆输（即两方答案均不正确）。

l 辩论赛和辩论所给予参与者的机会和时间不同

比赛要具有可观赏性，这就要有时间控制；辩论则相对来说没有时间限制，你可以随着研究的深入不断提出

新的证据来支持自己的观点，可以四处请教高人来为自己出谋划策，你可以修改自己口误说错的话等等。

l 辩论赛和辩论参与者的策略方法不同

在真正的辩论比赛当中，无论对方说的多么有道理，即便连自己听得都有道理，我们都不能承认其论点，具

体的做法无非是：1）视而不见（下策）2）避重就轻（上策，一般来说，辩手会故意夸大自己提出的本来不那么重要理由，而使裁判轻视对方提出的未加修饰和夸大的但却很重要的理由。）

反观辩论，为寻求解决办法的辩论双方都会本着实事求是的原则，客观的考虑对方的观点，并且在自己的原

来总的观点上作出微小的修正：以使自己的方案更能符合事实。

杨立民教授：

作为一个教育工作者，我觉得这些辩论赛传达给我们的年轻学生三个重要的讯息。

第一，外语能力（包括口语能力）是值得为之奋斗终身的一种才能。

人们常说外语是交际的工具，是就业的保障，是打开个人幸福之门的金钥匙，是价值几十亿的大产业。实际上，外语的重要性不能完全从功利主义的角度去理解。我们还要看到它对我们现代化的成败，文化的再造，

民族的复兴的作用。

我们都知道金钱是一种力量，科学家告诉我们知识也是一种力量，作为一个外语教师，我要说，语言也是一

种力量，口才也是一种力量。历史上叱咤风云的伟人，大多同时也是语言大师。试想一个人，不仗权势，不

动刀枪，不靠钱财，仅凭三寸不烂之舌，用我们熟悉的词加以不同排列组合，结果就能如此影响人，感动人，激励人，说服人，团结人，组织人，改造人；就能如此一呼百应，让人舍生忘死，冲锋陷阵，是多了不起的

力量！当年马克思一句“全世界无产者联合起来”，曾经激励多少革命者为之献身。美国革命时期又有多少

战士默默念着帕特里克?亨利的那句名言“不自由，毋宁死！”走上战场。讲到历史上的雄辩家，我们会想起林肯著名的葛底斯堡演说，短短272字，却字字闪耀着光辉，成为不朽的经典。中国古代历史上曾经有个叫

鬼谷子的，他的两个学生苏秦和张仪，一个周游列国，说服他们联合抗秦，结果挂了六国相印；另一个却说

服秦国将六国各个击破，结果统一了中国。说到培养一流雄辩家的杰出专家，这位老先生应该算是祖师爷。

我们现在的各类辩论赛，应该说重新唤起了我们对辩才的重视，让我们记起它是多么难得的艺术，多么有力

的武器，多么巨大的力量。

辩论赛的第二个启示是：我们的学生应该有一种关切社会的精神，用一位名人的话说，就是要有一种指点江

山的精神。

人生来就有生存、温饱、发展的要求，在这一点上，人和动物没有差别。人之所以成为人，正是因为人还有

列在马斯洛需求金字塔上层的要求。人类文明进步的过程说到底也就是人类从只关心自己，到逐步关心家庭、部落、氏族、国家、社会、全世界、全人类的过程。这些年来，社会上出现了一种拜金主义和只顾个人眼前

物质利益，对社会各种问题，人类面临的各种挑战冷漠无知的危险倾向。感谢这些辩论赛，让成千上万的年

轻学生深入思考各种重大问题，让他们去研究全球化的利弊，转基因食品的得失，取消死刑的是非，安乐死

的考虑等等。实际上围绕辩论赛准备的题材远远超过了以上的范围，而且可以肯定，随着改革开放的进一步

深入，国内政治空气日益宽松，人们会享有越来越多的言论自由，辩论必将越来越体现“真理面前无禁区”

的原则，涉及越来越多的重大的敏感话题。这对于培养新世纪人才，培养能够应对种种复杂的新问题，新挑

战的年轻一代具有难以估量的意义。

辩论赛的第三个启示是：我们的学生必须有一种独立思辩的能力。

他们看问题不能简单化；不能人云亦云，随大流，瞎起哄；不能只知其一，不知其二；不能先入为主，靠喜好，凭感觉，无根无据，胡言乱语；不能不尊重对方观点，肆意歪曲，断章取义，攻其一点，不及其余。辩

论赛的好处就在于让我们养成一个习惯，一种凡事都要问为什么的习惯；让我们学会一种本领，一种通过分析，思辩找到真理的本领。我们的学校不能生产只具有一定谋生本领的学生，不能出品只装有一些固定软件

的机器人，我们要为社会提供的应该是具有强烈求知欲望，能够进行创造性思维的不同的个体

英语辩论赛成为好辩手

Instructions

Things You'll Need:

Step 1

KNOW YOUR SUBJECT

A good debater learns and knows what he/she is talking about. Make sure you spend time in research and review. You cannot afford to be sloppy in a debate. Your strongest points should

be argued with clarity and conviction.

Step 2

KNOW YOUR OPPONENT'S ARGUMENTS

Research on the likely points your opponent might use. Get strong counter-arguments to those points. Great debaters outlearn their opponents so they can use what their opponents have to defeat them.

Step 3

USE SHORT, POWERFUL STORIES TO START YOUR POINTS

People love stories and they adore great storytellers. Get a great story for your point of view and deliver it well. Make your audience a part of your presentation. Appeal to their sense of decency, value and humanity.

Step 4

THINK ON YOUR FEET

When you encounter a brilliant opponent, you might be thrown a curveball. Your reaction to your opponent's points can make or break your likelihood of winning. Use brief and humorous phrases to tone down or erase the impact of your opponent's strategy.

Step 5

BE COMFORTABLE AND CONFIDENT

Let your audience and judges feel your passion for the subject. A debater has to be an orator as well. Your ability to capture the attention of the audience will pay in the end.

Step 6

GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT

Incorrect statistics and wrong dates can provide an opening to your opponent. Get everything in order and cross-checked. Come to the debate with the certainty that you are arguing with the right facts.

Step 7

BE CLEAR WITH YOUR PRESENTATION

A debate is a conversation with a lot of structure. Incomplete sentences will be translated

into incomplete ideas. This can weaken a strong argument. Pronunciation, pitch and enunciation is critical to this step.

2012年外研社杯英语辩论赛技巧

On Debating

Evidence: Quoting an authority is not evidence. Quoting a majority opinion is not evidence. Any argument that starts with, "According to Einstein..." is not based on objective evidence. Any argument that starts with, "Most biologists believe..." is not based on objective evidence. Saying, "The Bible says..." is not evidence. Authorities and majorities can be wrong and frequently have been. （历届辩论赛中出现最多的问题）

Emotionalism: Avoid emotionally charged words--words that are likely to produce more heat than light. Certainly the racial, ethnic, or religious hate words have no place in rational debating. Likewise, avoid argumentum ad hominem.Personal attacks on your opponent are an admission of intellectual bankruptcy. Also, slurs directed at groups with whom your opponent is identified are usually nonproductive. Try to keep attention centered on the objective problem itself. There is a special problem when debating social, psychological, political, or religious ideas because a person's theories about these matters presumably have some effect on his own life style. In other words, rather than saying

"and that's why you are such an undisciplined wreck" say,

"a person adopting your position is, I believe, likely to become an undisciplined wreck because ..."

Causality: Avoid the blunder of asserting a causal relationship with the popular fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc which declares that because some event A happened and immediately afterward event B happened that event A was the cause of event B. (I knew someone whose car stalled on the way to work. She would get out and open the hood and slam it and then the car would start. Singing a song would have been just as effective to allow time for a vapor lock to dissipate!) Also avoid the popular fallacy that correlation proves causation. People who own Cadillacs, on average, have higher incomes than people who don't. This does not mean that if we provided people with Cadillacs that they would have higher incomes.

Innuendo（影射）: Innuendo is saying something pejorative about your opponent without coming right out and saying it but by making more or less veiled allusions to some circumstance, rumor, or popular belief. If you want to see some excellent examples of innuendo, watch Rush Limbaugh. Politicians are, unfortunately, frequently guilty of using innuendo. It is an easy way to capitalize on popular prejudices without having to make explicit statements which might be difficult or impossible to defend against rational attack.

Be sure of your facts. What is the source of your information? If it is a newspaper or a magazine, are you sure that the information hasn't been "slanted" to agree with that publication's political bias? Where crucial facts are concerned, it is best to check with more than one source. Often international publications will give you a different perspective than your hometown newspaper. Check to see whether the book you are using was published by a regular publishing company or whether it was published by some special interest group like the John Birch Society or a religious organization. These books cannot be trusted to present unbiased evidence since their motivation for publishing is not truth but rather the furtherance of some political or

religious view.

Understand your opponents' arguments. It is good practice to argue with a friend and take a position with which you do not agree. In this way you may discover some of the assumptions your opponents are making which will help you in the

debate. Remember that everybody thinks that his position is the right one, and everybody has his reasons for thinking so.

Do not impute ridiculous or malevolent ideas to your opponent.

An example of this is the rhetorical statement,

"Have you stopped beating your wife?" This imputes or presupposes that your opponent has beaten his wife. One frequently sees references by conservative speakers and writers to the idea that gay activists want "special privileges." This would be ridiculous if it were true. It isn't true, but speaking as if it were true and well known to all is egregiously unfair to listeners or readers who may not be well informed. It is probably always wise to treat your opponent with respect, even if he doesn't deserve it. If he doesn't deserve respect, this will probably soon become obvious enough.

Regression to the mean(逻辑退化): Another source of error which occurs very frequently is the failure to take into account regression to the mean. This is a bit technical, but it is very important, especially in any kind of social or psychological research which depends upon statistical surveys or even experiments which involve statistical sampling. Rather than a general statement of the principle (which becomes more and more unintelligible as the statement becomes more and more rigorous) an example will be used.

Let's consider intelligence testing.

1. Perhaps we have a drug that is supposed to raise the IQ of mentally retarded kids. So we give a thousand intelligence tests and select the 30 lowest scoring individuals.

2. We then give these low scoring kids our drug and test them again.

3. We find that there has been an increase in the average of their IQ scores.

4. Is this evidence that the drug increased the IQ?

Not necessarily! Suppose we want to show that smoking marijuana lowers the IQ. Well, we take the 30 highest scoring kids in our sample and give them THC and test them again. We find a lower average IQ.

Is this evidence that marijuana lowers the IQ?

Not necessarily! Any statistician knows that if you make some kind of a measurement of some attribute of a large sample of people and then select the highest and lowest scoring individuals and make the same measurement again, the high scoring group will have a lower average score and the low scoring group will have a higher average score than they did the first time. This is called "regression to the mean" and it is a perfectly universal statistical principle.

There are undoubtedly more points to be made here. Suggestions will be gratefully

近几年外研社英文辩论赛主要辩题分类别整理作者

近几年外研社英文辩论赛主要辩题分类别整理作者： 医学类 require all healthy citizens to register their bone marrow data and donate marrow when needed. 所有健康公民应被强制登记骨髓数据并捐献。 House believes that animals should not be used as objects of sport and entertainment.动物不应被用作体育或娱乐活动的对象。 believes that doctor should never lie to their patients, even for their own good. 医生不应在任何时候对病人欺瞒病情。 grant those diagnosed with terminal illnesses the right to access treatments that have not completed clinical testing. 绝症患者应有权选择使用尚未完成临床测试检验的新药物或疗法。 house would ban all cosmetic surgeries. 美容整形应予以禁止。 ask smokers to pay for their own medical expenses. 吸烟者不应被提供医疗报销。 文化类

ban time-travel TV series in prime time. 应禁止在黄金时间播出穿越电视剧。 copyright of visual media belongs to the subject and not the photographer.影像制品的版权应归属被摄影人员而不是摄影单位。 have a Men’s day. 庆祝妇女节的同时也应设立男士节。 house would allow citizens to hide their health condition in job application.公民在求职时可隐瞒健康问题（如心脏病，肝炎，艾滋病等）。 house would ban beauty pageant. 选美比赛应被禁止。 ban war simulation games. 战争模拟游戏应当被立法禁止。 vegetarianism. “素食主义”应当被倡导。 教育类

世界大学生英语辩论赛辩题

世界大学生英语辩论赛辩题库（部分） 摘自：人人网 作者：Jade WUDC Berlin 2013 Motions Round 1 THW create public housing for the poor in wealthy areas Round 2 THBT Japan should acquire nuclear weapons Round 3 THW only imprison individuals who pose a direct and continuing threat to society Round 4 THBT International development institutions (such as the World Bank) should not finance natural resource extraction projects in corrupt states Round 5 THBT self described progressive males of dominant ethnicities are morally obliged to refrain from taking positions of responsibility where there is a qualified alternative candidate from a historically disadvantaged group who would otherwise receive the post Round 6 THW legally permit soldiers to refuse to participate in military actions or missions on the basis of conscience Round 7 THBT European Union nations should forgive Greece?s sovereign debt

英语辩论赛基本术语(1)

1.一辩：FIRST DEBATER 二辩：SECOND DEBATER 对方辩友，my fellow debaters 开始的陈词，Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen..... 陈述的时候一定要自信，把握好时间，如果到后来时间到，你却没陈述完的时候也要保持自信，微笑，不管他们，把话说完，所以陈述部分的最后几句一定要背熟练。别忘了说THANK YOU。 如果想要驳斥对方的逻辑，进行假设：according to your logic 2.Ways to open a debate To set the framework for our opinion, we believe it is necessary to state… We would like to introduce our stand by giving the following definitions. … In order to effectively debate this topic, we would like to propose…. A number of key issues arise which merit (deserve) closer examination. We will elaborate one of the most striking features of this problem, namely… In the first place we would like to make clear that…. The main argument focuses on…. 3.Ways to open a debate To set the framework for our opinion, we believe it is necessary to state… We would like to introduce our stand by giving the following definitions. … In order to effectively debate this topic, we would like to propose…. A number of key issues arise which merit (deserve) closer examination. We will elaborate one of the most striking features of this problem, namely… In the first place we would like to make clear that…. The main argument focuses on…. 4.Giving Reasons and offering explanations: To start with…, The reason why..., That's why..., For this reason..., That's the reason why..., Many people think...., Considering..., Allowing for the fact that..., When you consider that..., 5.I'm convinced that..., I honestly feel that…, I strongly believe that...,

关于英语辩论赛的技巧

关于英语辩论赛的技巧 英语辩论赛的技巧：多用反问句 在进行比赛的时候，可以多用一些反问句来增加气势，让对方觉得你准备充足，如经常用到Don't you think that。 英语辩论赛的技巧：语句要尽量简短 在英语辩论赛的时候尽量要以短小、简短的句子为主，用词要简单，道理浅显，别人一听就知道你在说的话语，而不是要想半天才明白你在说什么，如可以说you are bad，就尽量不要说you are not good。 英语辩论赛的技巧：要围绕主题 有些参加英语辩论赛的朋友，很多时候不知不觉在说的过程中就偏离了主题，其实这个对于英语辩论赛来说是很分的，一定切记要围绕主题，要有好心态，不要太心急。 英语辩论赛的技巧：保持微笑 每次站起来的时候要先微笑，过两秒再进行辩论。脸上保持微笑，这样会表示自己充满自信，也可以放松自己，同时给辩论对方一种气势，造成对方一定的心理压力。 英语辩论赛的技巧：语速要慢 记得你这个是英语辩论赛，全程是用英语进行的，你的对手在你说话快的程度可能会听得到明白你在说话，但大部分听众对于你说得快的情况就会不知道你在说什么，这样就是失去辩论的意义。 辩论赛技巧： 1、打乱阵脚：组织有序进攻，打乱对方的阵脚，使之兵未败而阵先乱，岂有不败之理? 2、直击底线。有意识地对对方底线全力猛攻，使其自我动摇，无力接济，仅有招架之功，却无还手之力，处于被动境地。 3、时间把握：即从严把握本方时间，有意启导、引导对方在无意识中把规定时间及早耗尽，以造成缺席审判的情势，这对本方极为有利。 4、节奏把握：自由辩论的时间不长，但是由于争锋剧烈，对抗性强，故往往呈现出很强的快节奏。一般而言，一强到底，一胜到底的队伍不多，这就需要有韧劲和力量持久才能取胜。故有经验的辩论队往往是先弱后强，欲擒故纵。其利在于先让对方强，以观察其底气，辨别其优劣，在制伏它。 5、避锋折锐：针锋相对，往往会陷于对峙和僵持。你针尖我麦芒，你推我搡，既不利于取胜，现场效果也不好。故有经验的辩论队往往不正面迎击，而是闪避一旁，轻轻折断其锋锐。这种闪避不是回避问题，而是巧用智力，或侧击、或高压、或机智、或幽默，巧击要害，巧借场上效果来使对方退却。简言之，即以大智大巧而对，不以表面热闹、直硬相拼见高低。 大家一定要记得上面所说的几点，并且多点练习就好。

近几年外研社英文辩论赛主要辩题分类别整理作者

近几年外研社英文辩论赛主要辩题分类别整理作者：大工英辩 医学类 1.THW require all healthy citizens to register their bone marrow data and donate marrow when needed. 所有健康公民应被强制登记骨髓数据并捐献。 2.This House believes that animals should not be used as objects of sport and entertainment. 动物不应被用作体育或娱乐活动的对象。 3.TH believes that doctor should never lie to their patients, even for their own good. 医生不应在任何时候对病人欺瞒病情。 4.THW grant those diagnosed with terminal illnesses the right to access treatments that have not completed clinical testing. 绝症患者应有权选择使用尚未完成临床测试检验的新药物或疗法。 5.This house would ban all cosmetic surgeries. 美容整形应予以禁止。 6.THW ask smokers to pay for their own medical expenses. 吸烟者不应被提供医疗报销。 文化类 1.THW ban time-travel TV series in prime time. 应禁止在黄金时间播出穿越电视剧。 2.THBT copyright of visual media belongs to the subject and not the photographer. 影像制品的版权应归属被摄影人员而不是摄影单位。 3.THW have a Men’s day. 庆祝妇女节的同时也应设立男士节。 4.This house would allow citizens to hide their health condition in job application.

“外研社杯”全国大学生英语辩论赛比赛细则

“外研社杯”全国大学生英语辩论赛比赛细则 一、报名方式 以团队为单位报名，每队由2名学生组成（即一个人扮演两个辩手的角色），填写详细准确的报名信息。内容包括： （1）队名（要求：积极向上，控制在10个字符之内，中英文不限），队名将作为该队在选拔赛对阵表中唯一标识； （2）2名辩手的姓名、所在院系及年级、手机号、常用邮箱； （注：赛前将由指导老师统一进行辩论指导） 二、参赛队伍构成： 每轮比赛由两支队伍构成，每队设两名辩手，正方一辩称为Leader of Proposition（正方领袖），二辩为Member of Proposition（正方成员）；反方一辩称为Leader of Opposition（反方领袖）, 二辩为Member of Opposition（反方成员）。 三、比赛规则： 为与省复赛及全国决赛接轨，本比赛采用目前国际流行的“议会式”辩论赛制（以下简称BP，即British Parliamentary Debating Format）。 比赛采用淘汰制，两个人组一队，参赛队伍通过抽签决定对手、辩论场地以及正方、反方。第一轮比赛结束，共有4支队伍晋级第二轮比赛。通过第二轮比赛选出2支队伍，最终产生PK选出一支队伍参加“外研社杯”全国大学生英语辩论赛福建省区复赛。（若参加比赛的队伍为单数，将通过抽签的方式选出一支队伍与第一轮比赛成绩最低的队伍PK，最终决定该队伍是否晋级第二轮复赛）四、辩论题目：This House Believes That Cooperation is better than Competition in promoting social advancement与竞争相比，合作更能使社会进步 五、比赛流程 （1）评分标准:每支辩论队两名辩手得分之和视为队伍得分,75分代表比赛选手的平均水平 （2）选手发言顺序: 每位选手都应按以下顺序进行发言：

英文辩论赛流程和规则

英文辩论赛流程和规则 Company number：【WTUT-WT88Y-W8BBGB-BWYTT-19998】

附件： 英语辩论赛流程以及评分标准 一、英语辩论赛流程 英语辩论赛采用国际议会制比赛形式，参照第十三届“外研社杯”全国英语辩论赛的要求，具体流程为： 1、主席致辞：宣布辩题及辩题相关背景资料；介绍选手包括学院、专业、年级及正反方所持观点等；介绍评委及比赛规则。 2.、比赛阶段： 比赛由正方和反方组成，双方各两名选手，选手可自行分工，一人担任一辩，一人担任二辩。比赛前15分钟主席将辩题(motion)公布给两队，并由抓阄决定正反方，正方对辩题持肯定态度，反方对辩题持否定态度，双方在辩论开始前有15分钟准备时间，辩论具体进行过程如下：1)正方一辩发言（7分钟） 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第六分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时---举牌提示 2）反方一辩发言（8分钟） 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示 3）正方二辩发言（8分钟） 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示 4）反方二辩发言（8分钟）

第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示 5）反方一辩总结（4分钟） 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第三分钟结束时--举牌提示,第四分钟结束时---举牌提示\ 6）正方一辩总结（5分钟） 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第四分钟结束时--举牌提示,第五分钟结束时---举牌提示 比赛阶段注意事项: 在提示牌提示结束后,有20秒宽限期,发言者必须在此期间内完成自己的发言,如果超过宽限期,则扣分.如果发言者发言时间远远少于规定时间,则评委会将此看作没有充分展开自己的观点而给发言者扣分. 在前1-4环节中,对方可以根据发言者正在申诉的论点提出本方的观点(pointofinformation,简称为POI) 比赛阶段提问者提出POI的注意事项: 1）POI要简短，切题，机智。严禁针对比赛规则和个人提出问题；2）提出POI时要从座位上起立，并举手示意.提问者可以用类似onthatpoint,Sir/Madam 的话引起发言者的注意； 3）发言者可以采取以下方式回应对方提出的POI:语言拒绝(类似sorry)、接受提问（类似ok）；

最全的英语辩论赛常用语

我方坚持认为” 应该是脱口而出We firmly insist that，“开头的观点the beginning viewpoint”，“最后的陈词the final statement” Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen..... Ways to open a debate ?To set the framework for our opinion, we believe it is necessary to state… ?We would like to introduce our stand by giving the following definitions. … ?In order to effectively debate this topic, we would like to propose…. ? A number of key issues arise which deserve closer examination. ?We will elaborate one of the most striki ng features of this problem, namely… ?In the first place we would like to make clear that….The main argument focuses on…. 1. Giving Reasons and offering explanations: ?To start with…, The reason why..., That's why..., For this reason..., That's the reason why..., ?Many people think...., Considering..., Allowing for the fact that..., When you consider that..., 2. Asking for an opinion from the other party ?I would be glad to hear your opinio n of … 我很乐意听听你对……的意见。 ?Are you of the same opinion as me? 你与我的看法一致吗？ ?I was wondering where you stood on the question of … 我想知道你对……问题怎么看。 ?well…what do you think (about ?Do you agree? (don't you agree?)你同意吗?(你是不是同意?) ?What's your view on the matter? how do you see it?你怎么看它? ?let‘s have your opinion.让我们听听你的意见！ ?do you think that…?你认为…吗 3. Stating an opinion陈述观点 ?I think..., In my opinion..., I believe… I'd like to point out that我想指出的是… ?Speaking for myself站在自己的立场上说…In my experience…根据我的经验… ?I'd like to say this：…我会这样说… I'd rather..., I'd prefer..., ?The way I see it..., As far as I'm concerned...,就我而言，… ?If it were up to me..., I suspect that..., ?I'm pretty sure that..., It is fairly certain that..., ?I'm convinced that..., I honestly feel that…, ?I strongly believe that..., Without a doubt...

2017年全国大学生英语竞赛

广州大学 教务〔2016 〕169号 关于组织我校本科生参加2017年全国大学生 英语竞赛的通知 各学院： 根据全国大学生英语竞赛组委会通知，2017年全国大学生英语竞赛（ National English Contest for College Students，简称NECCS）报名工作已经启动。为做好此项工作，现将有关事项通知如下： 一、竞赛宗旨与目的 全国大学生英语竞赛是经教育部批准的全国性的大学生英语综合能力竞赛活动，旨在贯彻落实教育部关于大学英语教学改革的精神，培养大学生的英语素质，激发学生学习英语的兴趣，全面展示全国各高校大学英语教学水平和教学改革的成果，提高大学生英语综合运用能力，推动全国大学英语教学上一个新台阶。

二、组织机构 本次比赛由教务处、外国语学院主办，外语教育训练实践基地承办。 三、报名日期和办法 1．报名费：根据全国竞赛组委文件规定参赛费30元/人。 2．报名方法：以各学院各专业自然班为单位统一集体缴费，不接受个人缴费。报名流程： （1）请报名学生于2016年12月19日--2016年12月26日登录数字广大教务系统网页报名（登录后 -> 活动报名->）。请及时通过系统报名，逾期系统将关闭报名功能，不再接受任何形式任何人的报名。 （2）报名学生于2016年12月28日前以班级为单位将报名费统一通过银行转账至指定大赛账号（账号由本竞赛联系人刘老师通过邮件回复发送）。缴费完毕后须带转账回执和报名信息汇总表--大学生英语竞赛报名表.xls（学号、学院、专业班级、姓名、邮箱地址、电话，由学习委员负责）至外语教育训练基地（文俊西608）现场确认。不确认者将会被视作报名无效。报名确认时间： 2016年12月29日- 30日9:00-12:00，14:00--16:00 （3）参赛准赛证在考试前（2017年3月底）发放，具体时间和地点另行通过邮件通知，请报名学生关注。 3．大赛联系人：刘老师联系邮箱：gzeccs@https://www.wendangku.net/doc/662357561.html,

英语辩论赛常用语

英语辩论赛常用语 A征求他人观点或意见的用语 I would be glad to hear your opinion of …我很乐意听听你对……的意见。Are you of the same opinion as I? 你与我的看法一致吗？ I was wondering where you stood on the question of …我想知道你对……问题怎么看。 B引入自己的新观点或看法的用语 Another point is that …另一点是…… Another way of looking at it is …看这个问题的另一个看法是…… I forgot to say / tell you that…我忘记要讲…... C就自己阐述的观点进行总结时的用语 That’s all I want to say. 我想说的就这些了。 Do you agree? I’m sure you agree. 你赞同吗？我相信你是赞同的。 D就对方阐述的观点进行总结时的用语 As you said…像你所说的那样…… But didn’t you say that…？但是，难道你没说过……吗？、 If I understood you correctly, you said that…要是我理解正确的话，你说过……. E如何礼貌地反对对方某一观点 I’m not sure really. Do you think so? Well, it depends.

I’m not so certain. Well, I’m not so sure about that. I’m inclined to disagree with that. No, I don’t think so really. F如何强烈反对对方某一观点 I disagree. I disagree with you entirely. I’m afraid I don’t agree. I’m afraid you are wrong there. I wouldn’t accept that for one minute. You can't really mean that. You can’t be serious. 大学生英语辩论赛的比赛规则及具体流程 1、主席致辞：宣布辩题及辩题相关背景资料；介绍选手包括学院、专业、年级及正反方所持观点等；介绍评委及比赛规则。 2.、比赛阶段： 1)正方一辩发言（7分钟） 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第六分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时---举牌提示 2）反方一辩发言（8分钟） 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示

英语辩论赛规则流程

英语辩论赛规则流程 一、比赛流程 1、辩论赛开始 2、宣布辩题 3、介绍参赛代表队及所持立场 4、介绍参赛队员 5、介绍规则、评委及工作人员 6、辩论比赛 7、评委点评 8、观众自由提问，评委评分（同时进行） 9、宣布比赛结果 10 辩论赛结束 二、辩论过程 1、辩方陈词立论阶段： （1）正、反方一辩发言 先由正反双方主辩发出陈述本方主要观点。必须在2分钟内完成。 （2）正、反方二辩发言 正方二辩、反方二辩以简洁文字做论据补充，时间不超过2分钟。 2、自由辩论阶段 由正方首先发言，然后反方发言，正反方依次轮流发言，时间不超过12分钟。 3、总结阶段 由双方四辩进行最后陈述，总结已方观点，反驳对方主观点，时间不超过3分钟。

5、观众提问：观众对双方队员进行提问，队员必须给予耐心解答。提问阶段双方的表现记入比赛成绩。 6、评委评分阶段 7、由评委对双方观点及辩论过程进行点评。 8、结果宣布 三、评判标准 （一）评分标准 1、论点明晰，论据充足，引证恰当，分析透彻。 2、迅速抓住对方观点及失误，驳论精到，切中要害。 3、反映敏捷，应对能力强。 4、表达清晰、层次清楚，逻辑严密。 （二）评分办法（团体和个人分别记分，满分均为100分） （1）审题：对所持立场能否从逻辑、理论、事实等多层次、多角度理解，论据是否充足，推理关系是否明晰，对本方的难点是否具有有效的处理方法。 （2）论证：论证是否有说服力，论据是否充分，推理过程是否合乎逻辑，事实引用是否得当、真实。 （3）辩驳：提问能否抓住对方要害，问题简单明了。在规定时间内没有提出问题或提问不清，应适当扣分。是否正面回答对方的问题，能否给人以有理有据的感觉。不回答或不正面回答应相应扣分。 （4）配合：是否有团队精神，是否相互支持，论辩衔接是否紧密。问答是否形成一个有机整体，给对方一个有力打击。 （5）辩风：所用语言和辩论风格讲究文明礼貌。不得对对方辩友和网友进行人身攻击。

大学英语辩论赛的比赛规则及具体流程

大学英语辩论赛的比赛规则及具体流程辩论赛是一场思维反映能力的竞赛，语言表达能力的竞赛，也是综合能力的竞赛。下面是搜集整理的大学英语辩论赛的比赛规则及具体流程，欢迎阅读。更多资讯请继续关注辩论赛栏目! 大学英语辩论赛的比赛规则及具体流程 本次大赛采用国际议会制比赛形式，参照第十三届“外研社杯”全国英语辩论赛的要求，具体流程为： 1、主席致辞：宣布辩题及辩题相关背景资料;介绍选手包括学院、专业、年级及正反方所持观点等;介绍评委及比赛规则。 2.、比赛阶段： 1)正方一辩发言(7分钟) 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第六分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时---举牌提示 2)反方一辩发言(8分钟) 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示 3)正方二辩发言(8分钟) 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示 4)反方二辩发言(8分钟) 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示

5)反方一辩总结(4分钟) 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第三分钟结束时--举牌提示,第四分钟结束时---举牌提示 6)正方一辩总结(5分钟) 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第四分钟结束时--举牌提示,第五分钟结束时---举牌提示 注意事项: 在提示牌提示结束后,有20秒宽限期,发言者必须在此期间内完成自己的发言,如果超过宽限期,则扣分.如果发言者发言时间远远少于规定时间,则评委会将此看作没有充分展开自己的观点而给发言者扣分. 在前1-4环节中,对方可以根据发言者正在申诉的论点提出本方的观点(point of information,简称为POI)提问者提出POI的注意事项: 1)POI要简短，切题，机智。严禁针对比赛规则和个人提出问题; 2)提出POI时要从座位上起立，并举手示意.提问者可以用类似on that point,Sir/Madam的话引起发言者的注意; 3)发言者可以采取以下方式回应对方提出的POI:语言拒绝(类似sorry)、接受提问(类似ok); 4)如果提出POI的要求被发言者接受，那么POI的陈述要以澄清事实或提出评论为形式，用一两句话在15秒内表达出来;如果被发言者拒绝，那么提问者坐回原位，准备下一次提问; 5)POI只能在前四个环节中提出，最后两个环节不能提出，前四个环节内第一分钟和最后一分钟内不可以提出POI; 6)发言者如果接受POI，那么就应针对提问并围绕自己的发言回答问题;

英语辩论赛规则流程

英语辩论赛规则流程 一、由辩论会主席承担 1、辩论赛开始 2、宣布辩题 3、介绍参赛代表队及所持立场 4、介绍参赛队员 5、介绍规则、评委及工作人员 6、辩论比赛 7、评委点评 8、观众自由提问，评委评分（同时进行） 9、宣布比赛结果 10 辩论赛结束 二、辩论过程 1、辩方陈词立论阶段： （1）正、反方一辩发言 先由正反双方主辩发出陈述本方主要观点贴。必须在指定的时间内完成。 （2）正、反方二辩发言 正方二辩、反方二辩以简洁文字重点从理论上论证己方观点； （3）正、反方三辩发言 由正方三辩、反方三辩分别以简洁文字进行实证分析，为本方观点提供论据支持。 2、自由辩论阶段 由正方首先发言，然后反方发言，正反方依次轮流发言。 （在相对集中的时间内进行）

3、总结阶段 由双方四辩进行最后陈述，总结已方观点，反驳对方主观点， （1）反方四辩总结陈词 （2）正方四辩总结陈词 5、观众提问：观众对双方队员进行提问，队员必须给予耐心解答。提问阶段双方的表现不记入比赛成绩。 6、评委评分阶段 7、由评委对双方观点及辩论过程进行点评。 8、结果宣布 三、辩论规则 1、每位队员必须在规定的时间内完成，超过时间按照弃权处理，并从所在团队总分中减掉5分。 2、自由辩论规则 自由辩论发言必须在两队之间交替进行，首先由正方一名队员发言，然后由反方一名队员发言，双方轮流，直到时间用完为止。 （每一场的自由辩论在集中的两个小时内完成，每场的具体时间另定，每贴的文字在60--800字之间，每次只能提一个问题。） 四、评判标准 （一）将聘请五位评委对本次比赛进行全程评议。 （二）评分标准 1、论点明晰，论据充足，引证恰当，分析透彻。 2、迅速抓住对方观点及失误，驳论精到，切中要害。 3、反映敏捷，应对能力强。 4、表达清晰、层次清楚，逻辑严密。 （三）评分办法（团体和个人分别记分，满分均为100分）

辩论赛经典实用辩论技巧

辩论赛经典实用辩论技巧 一、辩论赛中应该注意的问题 辩论赛中应该注意的问题1. 正方一辩的发言时间控制：正方一辩是整场辩论的第一个发言者他没有驳斥的对象要做的只是把事先准备好的稿子认认真真地念好。不过如果能在念出最后一个字时恰恰时间结束的铃声响起可收到先声夺人之效。这一点极难所以不必强求。正方一辩还有一些战术如在发言结尾向对方提出好几个问题以图扰乱对方一辩发言但对方如稍有经验一般是避而不答于是反而容易暴露本方的进攻点。一辩还常在结尾时说：关于___将由我方二辩、三辩作进一步的阐述。这种做法优点是在配合上显得连贯缺点是可能会破坏一辩的整体气势。如果时间已到而稿子还未念完可以把论点重复一遍然后坐下。 辩论赛中应该注意的问题2. 控制驳论的的比例：除正方一辩外其余辩论队员都面临着如何在发言中处理驳论与立论的关系初学者易犯的毛病：一是明明听到对方漏洞百出却不知从何下手好象武学中的全是空门竟然成了没有空门;二是知道应该驳斥哪一点一站起来就面红耳赤恨不得一棍子把对方打死但是由于无法有效地组织语言说起来吞吞吐吐观众看了都替他着急。驳论应该注意的问题是：①事先有所准备对方可能从哪点进攻做到心中有数可以把想到的驳论分点写在卡片上对方谈到哪一点就抽出哪张卡片放在稿子开头; ②首先驳斥对方的常识性错误及口误如对方背错

了某句诗词或在某句话中漏掉了一些关键字而导致意思截然相反都应该抓住机会予以痛击;临场驳斥要注意对方发言中的开头一段因为时间有限如果驳斥其结尾往往来不及组织语言; ③反驳的对象不要太过分散不超过3点; ④最好是针对前一个发言者进行驳斥如果中间已经隔了几轮发言驳斥的效果会减弱。当然对方的重大漏洞或关键的论点、论据例外; ⑤确实觉得反驳有困难可以只立论。 辩论赛中应该注意的问题3. 语言通俗化、口语化：初看辩论的人可能会觉得那些辩论稿满篇都是听不懂的新名词的辩手才是高手其实恰恰相反。前面已经说过辩手经过准备之后对辩题的理解往往比评委深刻这时既要深得入又要浅得出发言时要避免使用专用术语即使用也要作说明此外要多使用比喻、举例、排比等手法。如果能在发言中以幽默的语言或大义凛然的陈词引起观众的笑声和掌声对评委会产生较大影响这一点也同样适用于自由辩论。 辩论赛中应该注意的问题4. 概念的模糊和清晰：其实不光是概念很多场合都需要模糊的语言让对方找不到靶子这似乎和第3点有点矛盾但第3点指的是一般情况而这里指的却是特殊情况。举个例子：在法治能消除腐败的训练赛中我持正方立场这时我方面临的一个难题是怎样给消除下一个定义消除的权威定义是使不存在如果同意这个定义显然不利;如果不同意这个定义又实在太难驳倒甚至很难防守。最后我方采用了这样的定义：法治能消除腐

英语辩论赛常用词汇和表达法汇总辩论赛EnglishdebatingCompetition

英语辩论赛常用词 总 法汇 表达 汇和 辩论赛English debating Competition 辩论赛事debating event 决赛grand final 打分score the competition t he definition 主办 h ost\manage 正方pro side 定义要合理 会制辩论preliamentary 反方con side 议 should be reasonable 正方一辩the first debater 素材要有说服力matter debating style 赛preliminary debate of pro side should be persuasive 循环 淘汰赛elimination debate 反方一辩the second debater 没有平局there is no draws 八分之一决赛octofinals of con side in competitive competition t imekeeper 一辩：first debater 四分之一决赛quarterfinals 计时员 半决赛semifinals 二辩：second debater ，my fellow debaters 对方辩友 ，Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen..... 开始的陈词 如果想要驳斥对方的逻辑，进 设 ：according to your logic You are missing the point ！（你 行假 意，要用 没有说重点！你没有围绕中心！即，他在钻洞子，这个时候他很有可能会说漏 。注 are，不能说成Y ou're，因为这样语气，士气就没有了。） You just don't understand what we talked about ！（你根本就没有明白我们刚说了什么！即： 误解了，曲解了） You know what? You are straying from the main point ！你知道吗？你已经跑题了！（也要注 意，都用You are） 自由辩论的阶段，可以在他在说的时候，插进去 ，说“W ait！Wait！You just said??，did you？”（当然这句话要用在，你发现对方说的不正确时~~） You are generalizing what I asked ！(你在以偏盖全！即：我要你回答这个，但对方你绕过去 了！) Please ask my question！（请不要回避我的问题！请你回答！！） 正方affirmative 反方negative 辩题topic /issue 校园辩论赛academic debate /辩护 a dvocate 辩手 歧义ambiguity 位) 主事者agent of change(负责采取正方计划的人或单 a rgument 辩论argumentation (正式)辩论debate 论点，论据 断言assertion b acking 佐证 "Balance of arguments" judge 裁判式评判人员 "Better job of debating" judge 评审式评判人员 d ata,也作ground 推定presumption c laim 交锋c lash 资料 主张 g oals 通案反驳off-case 命题proposition e vidence 目标 论据 Refutation 反驳Stock issues 核心议题Topicality 合题性W arrant

“外研社杯”全国英语辩论赛

英文学院学生刘洋在“外研社杯”全国英语辩论赛中荣获一等奖 日前，第十七届“外研社杯”全国大学生英语辩论赛全国总决赛在北京外研社国际会展中心圆满落幕。代表我校参赛的英文学院学生刘洋同学和旅游学院张泽城同学凭借丰富的知识储备和稳定的发挥，从全国104支总决赛队伍中脱颖而出，与清华大学、澳门大学、中山大学、四川大学、中国传媒大学、北京航空航天大学、中央民族大学代表队一同打进半决赛，成为8强中唯一一支外语院校代表队，并最终荣获大赛一等奖的优异成绩。 “外研社杯”全国英语辩论赛创始于1997年，每年举办一届，是目前国内规模最大、水平最高的英语口语辩论赛事。权威性、规模以及品牌影响力已被全国广大的英语教师及在校大学生所认可，在高校中享有盛誉。本次大赛由团中央学

校部、全国学联秘书处、北京外国语大学主办，外语教学与研究出版社及中国教育电视台承办，共青团中央学校部部长陈光浩、北京外国语大学校长韩震、北京外国语大学团委书记陈洪兵、教育部高教司文科教育处处长刘向虹、外交部翻译室主任张建敏、中国宋庆龄基金会副主席井顿泉、北京团市委大学中专部部长张秀峰、英国大使馆文化教育处北京办公室主任、英国大使馆一等秘书胡达伟、杜鲁门大学副校长兼教务长Joan Poor、外研社总编辑徐建中、外交部翻译室英文处随员、第十届外研社杯英辩赛冠军张京等嘉宾出席了本次全国总决赛，并为获奖选手颁奖。 英文学院院长期以来高度重视大学生专业能力的训练和拔尖创新人才培养，将各类学术竞赛打造成为培养学生专业能力和综合素质的重要平台，在英语辩论大赛、英语演讲大赛、模拟联合国大会、英语口译大赛、大学生英语竞赛等全国性竞赛中屡获佳绩。 （英文学院）

第十五届外研社杯英语辩论赛辩题

第十五届外研社杯英语辩论赛辩题 demo: the international olympic committee should remove any age requirements for children to compete in the olympics. 表演赛：国际奥林匹克委员会应取消青少年参与奥林匹克竞技的年龄限制。 adjudication test: china should designate zones in municipalities in which prostitution would be legal. 评委考试：中国应在特定的地区开设红灯区。 practice #1: all money currently spent on confucius institutes abroad should be spent instead on alleviating domestic poverty. 练习赛第一场：中国应将其在海外建设孔子学院的所有资金用于国内的减贫。 practice #2: china should explicitly support iran’s right to develop nuclear weapons. 练习赛第二场：中国应明确立场，支持伊朗拥有发展核武器的权利。 practice #3: china should hold the passengers of cars driven by drunk drivers criminally liable. 练习赛第三场：中国应认定醉酒驾车司机的乘客负有刑责。 round 0: china should use taxpayers’ money to

英语辩论赛流程

一、辩论赛流程 (正反方各4人，计时员1人，主持人1人) 立论阶段 （一）正方一辩开篇立论，3分钟 （二）反方一辩开篇立论，3分钟 驳立论阶段 （三）反方二辩驳对方立论，2分钟 （四）正方二辩驳对方立论，2分钟 质辩环节 （五）正方三辩提问反方一、二、四辩各一个问题，反方辩手分别应答。每次提问时间不得超过15秒，三个问题累计回答时间为1分30秒。 （六）反方三辩提问正方一、二、四辩各一个问题，正方辩手分别应答。每次提问时间不得超过15秒，三个问题累计回答时间为1分30秒。 （七）正方三辩质辩小结，1分30秒。 （八）反方三辩质辩小结，1分30秒。 自由辩论 （九）自由辩论 总结陈词 （十）反方四辩总结陈词，3分钟。 （十一）正方四辩总结陈词，3分钟。 二、赛制具体说明： （一）立论阶段： 由正方双方的一辩选手来完成，要求立论的框架明确，语言通畅，逻辑清晰，能够正确的阐述己方的立场。（二）驳立论阶段： 这个阶段的发言由双方的二辩来进行，旨在针对对方的立论环节的发言进行回驳和补充己方的立论的观点，也可以扩展本方的立论方向和巩固己方的立场。 （三）质辩环节： 这个阶段是，由双方的三辩来完成这个环节，双方的三辩针对对方的观点和本方的立场设计三个问题，由一方的三辩起来提问对方的一辩，二辩，四辩各一个问题，要求被问方必须回答，不能闪躲，提问方的时间每个问题不可超过十五秒，回答方三个问题的回答累计时间是一分三十秒，双方的三辩交替提问，由正方开始，在质辩的环节中，要求双方的语言规范和仪态庄重，表述清晰。在质辩结束后，由双方的三辩针对对方的回答进行质辩小节，时间一分半，由正方开始。 （四）自由辩论阶段： 正反双方的八位辩手都要参加，辩论双方交替发言。双方都拥有四分钟的累计发言时间，在一方时间用完后，另外一方可以继续发言，直至本方的时间用完。在这个环节中，要求辩论双方的队员团结合作和整体配合，自由辩论阶段由正方开始 （五）结辩阶段： 针对对方的观点和己方的立场出发，总结本方的观点，阐述最后的立场 1 / 1