当前位置：文档库 › rfc4071.Structure of the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA)

rfc4071.Structure of the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA)

Network Working Group R. Austein, Ed. Request for Comments: 4071 ISC BCP: 101 B. Wijnen, Ed. Category: Best Current Practice Lucent Technologies April 2005 Structure of the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA)

Status of This Memo

This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the

Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for

improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

This document describes the structure of the IETF Administrative

Support Activity (IASA) as an activity housed within the Internet

Society (ISOC). It defines the roles and responsibilities of the

IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC), the IETF

Administrative Director (IAD), and ISOC in the fiscal and

administrative support of the IETF standards process. It also

defines the membership and selection rules for the IAOC.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

2. Definitions and Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1. Alphabet Soup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2. Principles of the IASA, IETF, and ISOC Relationship . . 4 2.

3. Community Consensus and Grant of Authority . . . . . . . 5 2.

4. Termination and Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

2.5. Effective Date for Commencement of IASA . . . . . . . . 5

3. Structure of the IASA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.1. IAD Responsibilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.2. IAOC Responsibilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.3. Relationship of the IAOC to Existing IETF Leadership . . 10 3.

4. IAOC Decision Making . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

3.5. Review and Appeal of IAD and IAOC Decision . . . . . . . 10

4. IAOC Membership, Selection and Accountability . . . . . . . . 11 4.1. Initial IAOC Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 1]

5. IASA Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 5.1. Cost Center Accounting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 5.2. IETF Meeting Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 5.3. Designated Donations, Monetary and In-Kind . . . . . . . 14 5.4. Other ISOC Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 5.5. IASA Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

5.6. Operating Reserve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

6. IASA Budget Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

7. ISOC Responsibilities for IASA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

10. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 11.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

1. Introduction

This document describes the structure of the IETF Administrative

Support Activity (IASA) as an activity housed within the Internet

Society (ISOC). It defines the roles and responsibilities of the

IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC), the IETF

Administrative Director (IAD), and ISOC in the fiscal and

administrative support of the IETF standards process. It also

defines the membership and selection rules for the IAOC.

The IETF undertakes its technical activities as an ongoing, open,

consensus-based process. This document defines an administrative

support structure intended to be responsive to the administrative

needs of the IETF technical community, and it describes how that

support structure fits under ISOC’s organizational umbrella. This

document does not affect the ISOC-IETF working relationship as it

relates to standards development or the communication of technical

advice relevant to the policy and educational goals of ISOC.

The IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA) provides the

administrative structure required to support the IETF standards

process and to support the IETF’s technical activities. As of the

time at which this document was written, this included the work of

IETF working groups, the IESG, the IAB, and the IRTF. Should the

IETF standards process at some future date come to include other

technical activities, the IAOC is responsible for developing plans to provide administrative support for them. Such support includes, as

appropriate, undertaking or contracting for the work described in

[RFC3716], including IETF document and data management, IETF

meetings, and any operational agreements or contracts with the RFC

Editor and the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). The IASA is also ultimately responsible for the financial activities

Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 2]

associated with IETF administrative support, such as collecting IETF meeting fees, paying invoices, managing budgets and financial

accounts, and so forth.

The IASA is responsible for ensuring that the IETF’s administrative

needs are met, and met well. The IETF does not expect the IASA to

undertake the bulk of this work directly; rather, the IETF expects

the IASA to contract this work from others and to manage these

contractual relationships to achieve efficiency, transparency, and

cost effectiveness.

The IASA is distinct from IETF-related technical functions, such as

the RFC Editor, the IANA, and the IETF standards process itself. The IASA has no influence on the technical decisions of the IETF or on

the technical contents of IETF work. Note, however, that this in no way prevents people who form part of the IASA from participating as

individuals in IETF technical activities.

2. Definitions and Principles

This section describes terminology and underlying principles used in the rest of this document.

2.1. Alphabet Soup

Although most of the terms, abbreviations, and acronyms used in this document are reasonably well known, first-time readers may find this alphabet soup confusing. This section therefore attempts to provide a quick summary.

IAB: Internet Architecture Board (see [RFC2026], [RFC2850]).

IAD: IETF Administrative Director, defined by this document.

IAOC: IETF Administrative Oversight Committee, defined by this

document.

IASA: IETF Administrative Support Activity, defined by this document. IESG: Internet Engineering Steering Group (see [RFC2026], [RFC3710]). IETF: Internet Engineering Task Force (see [RFC3233]).

ISOC: Internet Society (see [RFC2031] and [ISOC]).

Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 3]

2.2. Principles of the IASA, IETF, and ISOC Relationship

This section attempts to describe principles underlying the

mechanisms described in this document.

1. The IETF intends to establish a structure (the IASA) in order to have IETF administrative functions managed appropriately,

according to good administrative, fiscal, and management

principles. The IASA includes the IAD and the IAOC and shall be housed within ISOC.

2. The IAD and IAOC shall not have any authority over the IETF

standards development activities. This document does not modify ISOC’s other roles related to the IETF standards process.

3. The IAD and IAOC, in cooperation with the ISOC President/CEO and staff, shall develop an annual budget for the IASA. The budget

must clearly identify all expected direct and indirect

expenditures related to the IASA. ISOC, through its normal

procedures, shall evaluate and approve the IASA budget as part of ISOC’s own budget process and commit to ensuring funds to support the approved budget.

4. Responsibility for the evaluation, review, and negotiation of

contracts and other IETF administrative and support agreements

and other expenditures of funds under the IASA shall rest with

the IAD, operating in accordance with policies and procedures set by the IAOC and consistent with ISOC operating policies.

5. Once funds or in-kind donations have been credited to the IASA

accounts, they shall be irrevocably allocated to the support of

the IETF.

6. There shall be a detailed public accounting to separately

identify all funds available to and all expenditures relating to the IETF and to the IASA, including any donations, of funds or in kind, received by ISOC for IETF-related activities. In-kind

donations shall only be accepted at the direction of the IAD and IAOC.

7. Amongst the IETF, IASA and ISOC, the IETF, through the IASA,

shall have a perpetual right to use, display, distribute,

reproduce, modify, and create derivatives of all software and

data created in support of IETF activities.

Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 4]

8. The IASA, in cooperation with ISOC, shall use reasonable efforts to ensure that sufficient reserves exist to keep the IETF

operational in the case of unexpected events such as income

shortfalls.

The remainder of this document contains details based on the above

principles.

2.3. Community Consensus and Grant of Authority

The IETF is a consensus-based group, and authority to act on behalf

of the community requires a high degree of consensus and the

continued consent of the community. After a careful process of

deliberation, a broad-based community consensus emerged to house the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA) within the Internet

Society. This document reflects that consensus.

2.4. Termination and Change

Any change to this agreement shall require a similar level of

community consensus and deliberation and shall be reflected by a

subsequent Best Current Practice (BCP) document.

2.5. Effective Date for Commencement of IASA

The procedures in this document shall become operational after this

document has been approved by the process defined in BCP 9 [RFC2026], including its acceptance as an IETF process BCP by the ISOC Board of Trustees, and after the ISOC Board of Trustees has confirmed its

acceptance of ISOC’s responsibilities under the terms herein

described.

3. Structure of the IASA

The IASA structure is designed to ensure accountability and

transparency of the IETF administrative and fiscal activities to the IETF community. The IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC)

directs and oversees the IASA. The IAOC consists of volunteers, all chosen directly or indirectly by the IETF community, as well as

appropriate ex officio members from ISOC and IETF leadership. The

IAOC shall be accountable to the IETF community for the

effectiveness, efficiency, and transparency of the IASA.

The IASA consists initially of a single full-time ISOC employee, the IETF Administrative Director (IAD), who is entitled to act on behalf of the IASA at the direction of the IAOC. The IAD is likely to draw on financial, legal, and administrative support furnished by ISOC

support staff or consultants. Costs for ISOC support staff and Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 5]

consultants are allocated based on actual expenses or on some other

allocation model determined by consultation between the IAOC and

ISOC.

Although the IAD is an ISOC employee, he or she works under the

direction of the IAOC. A committee of the IAOC is responsible for

hiring and firing the IAD, for reviewing the IAD’s performance, and

for setting the compensation of the IAD. The members of this

committee are appointed by the IAOC and consist at minimum of the

ISOC President, the IETF Chair, and one of the Nomcom-appointed IAOC members.

The IAOC determines what IETF administrative functions are to be

performed, and how or where they should be performed (whether

internally within the IASA or by outside organizations), so as to

maintain an optimal balance of functional performance and cost of

each such function. The IAOC should document all such decisions, and the justification for them, for review by the community. Each

function should be reviewed on a regular basis using the assumption

that, absent such justification, the function is either unnecessary

or, if necessary, it is overstaffed, rather than using an assumption that anything that has been done in the past is still necessary; each function should be adjusted as needed given the result of this

review.

The IAD is responsible for negotiating and maintaining contracts or

equivalent instruments with outside organizations, and for providing any coordination necessary to make sure that the IETF administrative support functions are covered properly. All functions, whether

contracted to outside organizations or performed internally within

the IASA, must be clearly specified and documented with well-defined deliverables, service level agreements, and transparent accounting

for the cost of such functions.

The IASA is responsible for managing all intellectual property rights (IPR), including but not limited to trademarks, and copyrights that

belong to the IETF. The IASA is also responsible for managing the

ownership, registration, and administration of relevant domain names. The IASA is responsible for undertaking any and all required actions on behalf of the IETF to obtain, protect, and manage the rights that the IETF needs to carry out its work.

If the IASA cannot comply with the procedures described in this

document for legal, accounting, or practical reasons, the IAOC shall report that fact to the community, along with the variant procedure

that the IAOC intends to follow. If the problem is a long-term one, the IAOC shall ask the IETF to update this document to reflect the

changed procedure.

Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 6]

3.1. IAD Responsibilities

The IAD is responsible for working with the IAOC and others to

understand the administrative requirements of the IETF, and for

managing the IASA to meet those needs. This includes determining the structure of the IASA effort, establishing an operating budget,

negotiating contracts with service providers, managing the business

relationship with those providers, and establishing mechanisms to

track their performance. The IAD may also manage other contractors

or ISOC employees (such as support staff) as necessary, when such

contractors or employees are engaged in IASA-related work.

The IAD is responsible for running the IASA in an open and

transparent manner, and for producing regular monthly, quarterly, and annual financial and operational updates for IAOC and IETF community review.

The IAD is responsible for administering the IETF finances, for

managing separate financial accounts for the IASA, and for

establishing and administering the IASA budget. The IAD (with IAOC

approval, as appropriate) should have signing authority consistent

with carrying out IASA work effectively, efficiently and

independently, taking into account ISOC’s financial and approval

controls. If there are any problems regarding the level of financial approval granted to the IAD, the IAOC and ISOC shall work out a

policy that is mutually agreeable, and they shall do so within a

reasonable time frame.

The IAD negotiates service contracts, with input, as appropriate,

from other bodies, including legal advice, and with review, as

appropriate, by the IAOC. The IAOC should establish guidelines for

what level of review is expected based on contract type, size, cost, or duration. ISOC executes contracts on behalf of the IASA, after

whatever review ISOC requires to ensure that the contracts meet

ISOC’s legal and financial guidelines.

The IAD shall ensure that contracts entered into by ISOC on behalf of the IASA and/or the IETF (an "IASA Contract") that provide for the

creation, development, modification, or storage of any data

(including, without limitation, any data relating to IETF membership, documents, archives, mailing lists, correspondence, financial

records, personnel records and the like) ("Data"), grant to ISOC the perpetual, irrevocable right, on behalf of IASA and IETF, to use,

display, distribute, reproduce, modify and create derivatives of such Data. ISOC will permit IASA and its designee(s) to have sole control and custodianship of such Data, and ISOC will not utilize or access

such Data in connection with any ISOC function other than IETF

without the written consent of the IAD.

Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 7]

The IAD shall ensure that personal data collected for legitimate

purposes of the IASA are protected appropriately; at minimum, such

data must be protected to a degree consistent with relevant

legislation and applicable privacy policies.

If an IASA Contract provides for the creation, development, or

modification of any software (including, without limitation, any

search tools, indexing tools, and the like) ("Developed Software"),

then the IAD shall, whenever reasonable and practical, ensure that

such contract either (a) grants ownership of such Developed Software to ISOC, or (b) grants ISOC a perpetual, irrevocable right, on behalf of IASA and IETF, to use, display, distribute, reproduce, modify, and create derivatives of such Software (including, without limitation,

pursuant to an open source style license). It is preferred that

Developed Software be provided and licensed for IASA and IETF use in source code form, with no ongoing payments. ISOC will permit the

IASA and its designee(s) to have sole control and custodianship of

such Developed Software. The foregoing rights are not required in

the case of off-the-shelf or other commercially-available software

that is not developed at the expense of ISOC.

If an IASA Contract relates to the licensing of third-party software, the IAD shall ensure that such license expressly permits use of such software for and on behalf of the IASA and/or the IETF, as

applicable, and that such license is transferable in accordance with the provisions of Section 7 (Removability).

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the IAD can enter into different terms if doing so is in the best interest of the IETF and upon approval of the IAOC.

The IAD and IAOC are responsible for making all business decisions

regarding the IASA. In particular, the ISOC Board of Trustees shall not have direct influence over the choice of IASA contractors or IETF meeting sponsors. This restriction is meant to enforce the

separation between fund-raising and the actual operation of the

standards process.

The IAD prepares an annual budget, which is subject to review and

approval by the IAOC. The IAD is responsible for presenting this

budget to the ISOC Board of Trustees, as part of ISOC’s annual

financial planning process. As described elsewhere in this document, the IAOC is responsible for ensuring the budget’s suitability for

meeting the IETF community’s administrative needs, but the IAOC does not bear fiduciary responsibility for ISOC. The ISOC Board of

Trustees therefore needs to review and understand the budget and

planned activity in enough detail to carry out its fiduciary

responsibility properly. The IAD is responsible for managing this Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 8]

process of review and approval. The IAD sees to it that the IASA

publishes its complete approved budget to the IETF community each

year.

3.2. IAOC Responsibilities

The IAOC’s role is to provide appropriate direction to the IAD, to

review the IAD’s regular reports, and to oversee IASA functions to

ensure that the administrative needs of the IETF community are being properly met. The IAOC’s mission is not to be engaged in the day-

to-day administrative work of the IASA, but rather to provide

appropriate direction, oversight, and approval.

Therefore, the IAOC’s responsibilities are as follows:

o To select the IAD and to provide high-level review and direction

for his or her work. This task should be handled by a sub-

committee, as described above.

o To review the IAD’s plans and contracts to ensure that they will

meet the administrative needs of the IETF.

o To track whether the IASA functions are meeting the IETF

community’s administrative needs, and to work with the IAD to

determine a plan for corrective action if they are not.

o To review the IAD’s budget proposals to ensure that they will meet the IETF’s needs, and to review the IAD’s regular financial

reports.

o To ensure that the IASA is run in a transparent and accountable

manner. Although the day-to-day work should be delegated to the

IAD and others, the IAOC is responsible for ensuring that IASA

finances and operational status are tracked appropriately, and

that monthly, quarterly, and annual financial and operational

reports are published to the IETF community.

o To designate, in consultation with the IAB and the IESG, the

person or people who carry out the tasks that other IETF process

documents say are carried out by the IETF Executive Director.

The IAOC’s role is to direct and review, not to perform, the work of the IAD and IASA. The IAOC holds periodic teleconferences and face- to-face meetings as needed to carry out the IAOC’s duties efficiently and effectively.

Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 9]

If there is no IAD or if the IAD is unavailable, the IAOC may

temporarily assign the IAD’s duties to individual members of the

IAOC.

3.3. Relationship of the IAOC to Existing IETF Leadership

The IAOC is directly accountable to the IETF community for the

performance of the IASA. However, the nature of the IAOC’s work

involves treating the IESG and IAB as major internal customers of the administrative support services. The IAOC and the IAD should not

consider their work successful unless the IESG and IAB are also

satisfied with the administrative support that the IETF is receiving.

3.4. IAOC Decision Making

The IAOC attempts to reach consensus on all decisions. If the IAOC

cannot achieve a consensus decision, then the IAOC may decide by

voting.

The IAOC decides the details about its decision-making rules,

including its rules for quorum, conflict of interest, and breaking of ties. These rules shall be made public.

All IAOC decisions shall be recorded in IAOC minutes, and IAOC

minutes shall be published in a timely fashion.

3.5. Review and Appeal of IAD and IAOC Decision

The IAOC is directly accountable to the IETF community for the

performance of the IASA. In order to achieve this, the IAOC and IAD will ensure that guidelines are developed for regular operational

decision making. Where appropriate, these guidelines should be

developed with public input. In all cases, they must be made public. If a member of the IETF community questions whether a decision or

action of the IAD or the IAOC has been undertaken in accordance with IETF BCPs or IASA operational guidelines, or questions whether the

IASA has created and maintained appropriate guidelines, he or she may ask the IAOC for a formal review of the decision or action.

The request for review should be addressed to the IAOC chair and

should include a description of the decision or action to be

reviewed, an explanation of how, in the requestor’s opinion, the

decision or action violates the BCPs or operational guidelines, and a suggestion for how the situation could be rectified. All requests

for review shall be posted publicly, and the IAOC is expected to

respond to these requests within a reasonable period, typically

within 90 days. It is up to the IAOC to determine what type of Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 10]

review and response is required, based on the nature of the review

request. Based on the results of the review, the IAOC may choose to overturn their own decision, to change their operational guidelines

to prevent further misunderstandings, to take other action as

appropriate, or just to publish the review result and take no other

action.

If a member of the community is not satisfied with the IAOC’s

response to his or her review request, he or she may escalate the

issue by appealing the decision or action to the IAB, using the

appeals procedures outlined in RFC 2026 [RFC2026]. If he or she is

not satisfied with the IAB response, he or she can escalate the issue to the ISOC Board of Trustees, as described in RFC 2026.

The reviewing body (the IAB or ISOC Board of Trustees) shall review

the decision of the IAD or IAOC to determine whether it was made in

accordance with existing BCPs and operational guidelines. As a

result of this review, the reviewing body may recommend to the

community that the BCPs governing IAOC actions should be changed.

The reviewing body may also advise the IAOC to modify existing

operational guidelines to avoid similar issues in the future and/or

it may advise the IAOC to re-consider their decision or action. It

may also recommend that no action be taken, based on the review.

In exceptional cases, when no other recourse seems reasonable, the

reviewing body may overturn or reverse a non-binding decision or

action of the IAOC. This should be done only after careful

consideration and consultation with the IAOC regarding the

ramifications of this action. In no circumstances may the IAB or

ISOC Board of Trustees overturn a decision of the IAOC that involves a binding contract or overturn a personnel-related action (such as

hiring, firing, promotion, demotion, performance reviews, salary

adjustments, etc.).

4. IAOC Membership, Selection and Accountability

The IAOC shall consist of eight voting members who shall be selected as follows:

o Two members appointed by the IETF Nominations Committee (NomCom); o One member appointed by the IESG;

o One member appointed by the IAB;

o One member appointed by the ISOC Board of Trustees;

o The IETF Chair (ex officio);

Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 11]

o The IAB Chair (ex officio);

o The ISOC President/CEO (ex officio).

The IETF Administrative Director also serves, ex officio, as a non-

voting member of the IAOC.

The IAOC may also choose to invite liaisons from other groups, but it is not required to do so; the IAOC decides whether to have a liaison to any particular group. Any such liaisons are non-voting.

Responsibility for selecting the individual filling a particular

liaison role lies with the body from which the IAOC has requested the liaison.

Subject to paragraph 2 of Section 4.1, appointed members of the IAOC serve two-year terms. IAOC terms normally end at the end of the

first IETF meeting of a year.

The members of the IAOC shall select one of its appointed voting

members to serve as the chair of the IAOC. The term of the IAOC

chair shall be one year from the time of selection or the remaining

time of his or her tenure on the IAOC, whichever is less. An

individual may serve any number of terms as chair, if selected by the IAOC.

The Chair serves at the pleasure of the IAOC and may be removed from that position at any time by a vote of 2/3 of the voting IAOC

members, not counting the IAOC chair.

The chair of the IAOC shall have the authority to manage the

activities and meetings of the IAOC.

The two NomCom-appointed IAOC members are chosen using the procedures described in RFC 3777 [RFC3777]. For the initial IAOC selection, the IESG will provide the list of desired qualifications for these

positions; in later years, the IAOC will provide this qualification

list. The IESG will serve as the confirming body for IAOC

appointments by the NomCom.

While there are no hard rules regarding how the IAB and the IESG

should select members of the IAOC, such appointees need not be

current IAB or IESG members (and probably should not be, if only to

avoid overloading the existing leadership). The IAB and IESG should choose people with some knowledge of contracts and financial

procedures, who are familiar with the administrative support needs of the IAB, the IESG, or the IETF standards process. The IAB and IESG

should follow a fairly open process for these selections, perhaps

with an open call for nominations or a period of public comment on Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 12]

the candidates. The procedure for IAB selection of ISOC Board of

Trustees [RFC3677] might be a good model for how this could work.

After the IETF gains some experience with IAOC selection, these

selection mechanisms should be documented more formally.

Although the IAB, the IESG, and the ISOC Board of Trustees choose

some members of the IAOC, those members do not directly represent the bodies that chose them. All members of the IAOC are accountable

directly to the IETF community. To receive direct feedback from the community, the IAOC holds an open meeting at least once per year at

an IETF meeting. This may take the form of an open IAOC plenary or a working meeting held during an IETF meeting slot. The form and

contents of this meeting are left to the discretion of the IAOC

Chair. The IAOC should also consider open mailing lists or other

means to establish open communication with the community.

IAOC members are subject to recall in the event that an IAOC member

abrogates his or her duties or acts against the best interests of the IETF community. Any appointed IAOC member, including any appointed

by the IAB, IESG, or ISOC Board of Trustees, may be recalled using

the recall procedure defined in RFC 3777 [RFC3777]. IAOC members are not, however, subject to recall by the bodies that appointed them.

If a vacancy occurs among the appointed members, this is filled by

the appointing body for that position according to its procedures.

The IAOC members shall not receive any compensation from the IASA,

ISOC, or IETF for their services as members of the IAOC.

The IAOC shall set and publish rules covering reimbursement of

expenses, and such reimbursement shall generally be for exceptional

cases only.

4.1. Initial IAOC Selection

The initial IAOC selection will start after this document is approved as a BCP by the IESG and accepted by the ISOC Board of Trustees. The IESG, IAB, and ISOC Board of Trustees should make their selections

within 45 days of BCP approval, and the NomCom should make their

selections as quickly as possible while complying with the documented NomCom procedures. The IAOC will become active as soon as a majority (three or more) of the appointed members have been selected.

Initially, the IESG and the ISOC Board of Trustees will make one-year appointments, the IAB will make a two-year appointment, and the

NomCom will make one one-year appointment and one two-year

appointment. This will establish a pattern in which approximately

half of the IAOC is selected each year.

Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 13]

5. IASA Funding

The IASA manages money from three sources:

1. IETF meeting revenues;

2. Designated donations to ISOC (both monetary and in-kind);

3. Other ISOC support.

Note that the goal is to achieve and maintain a viable IETF support

function based on available funding sources. The IETF community

expects the IAOC and ISOC to work together to attain that goal.

5.1. Cost Center Accounting

Funds managed by the IASA shall be accounted for in a separate set of general ledger accounts within the IASA Cost Center. In the

remainder of this document, these general ledger accounts are termed "IASA accounts". A periodic summary of the IASA accounts shall be

reported in the form of standard financial statements that reflect

the income, expenses, assets, and liabilities of the IASA.

The IAOC and ISOC shall agree upon and publish procedures for

reporting and auditing of these accounts.

Note that ISOC in consultation with the IAOC can decide to structure the IASA accounting differently in the future within the constraints outlined in Section 7.

5.2. IETF Meeting Revenues

Meeting revenues are an important source of funds for IETF functions. The IAD, in consultation with the IAOC, sets the meeting fees as part of the budgeting process. All meeting revenues shall be credited to the appropriate IASA accounts.

5.3. Designated Donations, Monetary and In-Kind

Donations are an essential component of funding. The IASA undertakes no direct fund-raising activities. This establishes a practice of

separating IETF administrative and standards activities from fund-

raising activities, and it helps ensure that no undue influence may

be ascribed to those from whom funds are raised.

ISOC shall create and maintain appropriate structures and programs to coordinate donations intended to support the work of the IETF, and

these shall include mechanisms for both in-kind and direct

Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 14]

contributions to the work supported by IASA. Since ISOC will be the sole entity through whom donations may be made to the work of the

IETF, ISOC shall ensure that those programs are not unduly

restrictive. ISOC shall maintain programs that allow for designated donations to the IETF.

In-kind resources are owned by the ISOC on behalf of the IETF and

shall be reported and accounted for in a manner that identifies them as such. Designated monetary donations shall be credited to the

appropriate IASA accounts.

5.4. Other ISOC Support

Other ISOC support shall be based on the budget process as specified in Section 6, which includes deciding when ISOC monetary support is

to be credited to the IASA accounts.

All ISOC support, no matter how it is delivered, shall be reported in the IASA financial reports.

5.5. IASA Expenses

The IASA exists to support the IETF. Funds designated for the IASA

shall be used solely to support IETF activities and for no other

purposes.

5.6. Operating Reserve

As an initial guideline and in normal operating circumstances, the

IASA should have an operating reserve for its activities sufficient

to cover 6 months of non-meeting operational expenses, plus twice the recent average for meeting contract guarantees. The IASA, in

cooperation with ISOC, shall establish detailed targets for a reserve fund to cover normal operating expenses and meeting expenses, in

accordance with prudent planning and as part of the budget process.

The IASA expects ISOC to use reasonable efforts to build and provide that operational reserve, through whatever mechanisms ISOC deems

appropriate.

If the IASA accounts accumulate a surplus, ISOC may count that as

part of the reserve.

Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 15]

6. IASA Budget Process

While the IASA sets a budget for the IETF’s administrative needs, its budget process clearly needs to be closely coordinated with ISOC’s.

The specific timeline shall be established each year by IASA and

ISOC. As an example, a general annual timeline for budgeting is:

July 1: The IAD presents a budget proposal (prepared in consultation with ISOC staff) for the following fiscal year, with 3-year

projections, to the IAOC.

August 1: The IAOC approves the budget proposal for IETF purposes,

after any appropriate revisions. As the ISOC President is part of the IAOC, the IAOC should have a preliminary indication of how the budget will fit with ISOC’s own budgetary expectations. The

budget proposal is passed to the ISOC Board of Trustees for review in accordance with its fiduciary duty.

September 1: The ISOC Board of Trustees approves the budget proposal provisionally. During the next 2 months, the budget may be

revised to be integrated in ISOC’s overall budgeting process.

November 1: Final budget to the ISOC Board for approval.

The dates described above are examples and are subject to change.

They will most likely be modified each year based on the dates of the second and third IETF meetings of that year. They also need to be

synchronized with the ISOC budgeting process.

The IAD shall provide monthly accountings of expenses and shall

update expenditures forecasts every quarter. This may require

adjustment of the IASA budget. If so, the revised budget will need

to be approved by the IAOC, the ISOC President/CEO and, if necessary, the ISOC Board of Trustees.

7. ISOC Responsibilities for IASA

Within ISOC, support for the IASA shall meet the following goals:

Transparency: The IETF community shall have complete visibility into the financial and legal structure of the ISOC activities that are related to, but not part of, the IASA standards support activity. In particular, a detailed budget for the entire related ISOC

activity, quarterly financial reports, and audited annual

financial reports shall all be available to the IETF community.

In addition, key contract material and MOUs shall also be publicly available, subject to any reasonable confidentiality obligations

approved by the IAOC.

Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 16]

Unification: As part of this arrangement, ISOC’s sponsorship of the

RFC Editor, IAB and IESG shall be managed as part of the IASA

under the IAOC.

Independence: The IASA shall be distinct from other ISOC activities. ISOC shall support the IASA through the mechanisms specified in

this document and its successors.

Support: ISOC shall work with the IAD and IAOC to ensure appropriate financial support for the IASA, following the mechanisms described in this document and its successors.

Removability: While there is no current plan to transfer the legal

and financial home of the IASA to another corporation, the IASA

shall be structured to enable a clean transition in the event that the IETF community decides that such a transition is required and documents its consensus in a formal document (currently called a

BCP). In such a case, the IAOC shall give ISOC a minimum of six

months’ notice before the transition formally occurs. During that period, the IETF and ISOC shall work together to create a smooth

transition that does not result in any significant service outages or missed IETF meetings. All contracts executed by ISOC on behalf of the IASA shall either include a clause allowing termination by ISOC with six months notice, or be transferable to another

corporation in the event that the IASA transitions away from ISOC. To the extent allowed by law, any balance in the IASA accounts,

any IETF-specific intellectual property rights, and any IETF-

specific data and tools shall also transition to the new entity.

Other terms shall be negotiated between the IETF and ISOC.

Within the constraints outlined above, all other details of how to

structure this activity within ISOC (for instance, as a cost center, a division, or an affiliate) shall be determined by ISOC in

consultation with the IAOC.

8. Security Considerations

This document describes the structure of the IETF’s administrative

support activity. It introduces no security considerations for the

Internet.

9. IANA Considerations

This document has no IANA considerations in the traditional sense.

However, some of the information in this document may affect how the IETF standards process interfaces with the IANA, so the IANA may be

interested in the contents.

Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 17]

10. Acknowledgements

The editors would like to thank everyone who provided feedback on

this document or any of its predecessors back to the original

"Scenario O" e-mail message. In particular, the editors would like

to thank: Bernard Aboba, Jari Arkko, Fred Baker, Scott Bradner, Scott Brim, Brian Carpenter, Jorge Contreras, Dave Crocker, Elwyn Davies,

Spencer Dawkins, Avri Doria, Tony Hain, Joel Halpern, Ted Hardie, Sam Hartman, Russel Housley, Geoff Huston, Jeff Hutzelman, John Klensin, Valdis Kletnieks, Eliot Lear, Henrik Levkowetz, Kurt Erik Lindqvist, John Loughney. Carl Malamud, Allison Mankin, Tom Petch, Eric

Rescorla, Pete Resnick, Glenn Ricart, Jonne Soininen, Lynn St. Amour, and Michael StJohns.

Special thanks are due to Leslie Daigle and Margaret Wasserman, who

wrote the original "Scenario O" message and edited the earliest

versions of this document.

Special thanks are also due to Henrik Levkowetz for kindly

volunteering to maintain the issue tracking system associated with

this document.

Last, special thanks are due to Harald Alvestrand, for leading the

search for consensus on the IETF mailing list.

No doubt the above list is incomplete. We apologize to anyone whom

we left out.

This document was written using the xml2rfc tool described in RFC

2629 [RFC2629].

11. References

11.1. Normative References

[RFC2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision

3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996.

[RFC3716] IAB Advisory Committee, "The IETF in the Large:

Administration and Execution", RFC 3716, March 2004.

[RFC3777] Galvin, J., "IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and

Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall

Committees", BCP 10, RFC 3777, June 2004.

Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 18]

11.2. Informative References

[ISOC] Internet Society, "Internet Society By-Laws", February

2001,

. [RFC2031] Huizer, E., "IETF-ISOC relationship", RFC 2031, October

1996.

[RFC2629] Rose, M., "Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML", RFC 2629,

June 1999.

[RFC2850] Internet Architecture Board and B. Carpenter, "Charter of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB)", BCP 39, RFC 2850, May 2000.

[RFC3233] Hoffman, P. and S. Bradner, "Defining the IETF", BCP 58,

RFC 3233, February 2002.

[RFC3677] Daigle, L. and Internet Architecture Board, "IETF ISOC

Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures", BCP 77, RFC

3677, December 2003.

[RFC3710] Alvestrand, H., "An IESG charter", RFC 3710, February

2004.

Authors’ Addresses

Rob Austein (editor)

Internet Systems Consortium

950 Charter Street

Redwood City, CA 94063

USA

EMail: sra@https://www.wendangku.net/doc/a716135574.html,

Bert Wijnen (editor)

Lucent Technologies

Schagen 33

3461 GL Linschoten

Phone: +31-348-407-775

EMail: bwijnen@https://www.wendangku.net/doc/a716135574.html,

Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 19]

Full Copyright Statement

This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions

contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors

retain all their rights.

This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET

ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,

INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE

INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED

WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Intellectual Property

The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any

Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in

this document or the extent to which any license under such rights

might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has

made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be

found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any

assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an

attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this

specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at https://www.wendangku.net/doc/a716135574.html,/ipr.

The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any

copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary

rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement

this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-

ipr@https://www.wendangku.net/doc/a716135574.html,.

Acknowledgement

Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the

Internet Society.

Austein & Wijnen Best Current Practice [Page 20]

组织部简介及职能

组织部简介及职能 Company number：【WTUT-WT88Y-W8BBGB-BWYTT-19998】

设计与艺术学院团总支学生会组织部简介及职能简介：组织部是学院党团共建工作的助手，也是学院团总支学生会工作的重要组成部门，具体负责全院团支部的思想建设和组织建设，不断加强对各班团员青年的思想政治教育工作，及时解决各班团支部建设中存在的问题，从而有效组织和指导各团支部开展学校团委和学院团工委的各项活动。组织部在长期的工作过程中逐渐形成了严谨、高效、规范、创新的工作作风。职能：日常工作和特色活动。日常工作 1、做好团员发展工作，按时收缴团费，做好团员证的注册、补办以及团组织关系转入（出）。 2、召开团支书例会，及时下达学习文件及有关指示精神，引导和监督各年级团支部认真开展团组织活动。 3、了解团员的思想、工作情况，及时做好反馈工作并对团员进行思想教育和纪律教育，并编写学期初的思想动态。 4、负责对各班的团干部进行考察和培训，提高其素质和工作能力，做到权责分明，指导他们认真、切实地开展团支部活动，以及协助党代表开展本班团支部的党建工作。

5、优秀团员、团干部、团支部以及优秀党员、党代表的评选表彰:每学期都要对各团支部以及党代表的工作予以考核评比,对于表现突出的组织和个人给予表彰。特色活动 1.优秀学生座谈会，旨在让各位同学在新学期伊始，大家就回家的所见，所闻，所感，所想进行交流。以促进同学之间的相互了解，和同学之间的友谊。为大家进行思想碰撞提供绝佳的机会。 2.团日活动，及时了解各位同学在生活，学习中遇到问题。以便尽快解决。我们还会就一些热点问题展开讨论。给大家交流提供机会。除了以上几项基本工作以外，组织部始终坚持为广大同学服务，贡献的坚定信念，尽我所能与其他各部门鼎力合作，共同完成团总支学生会的工作。总之，组织部的行动中贯穿着哪个地方需要“组织”就去哪里的“方针”，颇有管家的风范。

组织部工作职责范文

组织部工作职责范文干部工作岗位职责第一条、负责贯彻执行和结合实际研究制定选拔任用干部的标准、程序，做好区管科级干部的推荐、考核、任免、调配等工作的准备、材料收集、材料归档；第二条、负责科级后备干部的选拔、培养、管理工作，拟定选拔培养科级后备干部规划，建立后备 __和档案，做好科级后备干部的选拔、考核、调整、补充、审批、呈报工作，及时提出后备干部工作的建议和意见，切实抓好后备干部队伍建设；第三条、负责处级后备干部信息的选拔、培养、管理工作，并做好有关工作；及时将后备干部登记表，考察材料、民主推荐情况、民主评议情况、考核情况、培养和奖惩情况等，按照干部管理权限，对后备干部材料实行统一管理。实现管理工作的规范化、科学化。第四条、负责抓好领导班子和领导干部的思想作风建设，以加强和改进思想工作作风为重点，以增强各级领导班子的创造力、凝聚力、战斗力为目标，加强思想教育，推进制度建设，解决突出问题，营造良好环境，努力塑造领导班子和干部队伍新形象，总结推广加强领导班子建设的典型经验；

第五条、负责领导班子宏观管理工作，贯彻党的干部工作方针政策，并按要求研究制定干部工作方面的办法和规定；第六条、负责领导班子民主生活会以及质量测评工作，认真做好准备，广泛征求基层干部群众和社会各界对领导班子及成员的意见和建议，对征求到的意见要进行认真梳理和反馈，确保区级领导班子民主生活会质量；第七条、负责科级干部选拔任免向市委组织部备案工作，按照市部要求，保证上报表格和材料达到完整、准确、及时、全面的要求；第八条、负责干部挂职锻炼工作，根据干部培养和工作的实际需要，拓宽干部挂职锻炼选派渠道，丰富挂职锻炼的形式和内容，积极探索干部挂职锻炼的长效机制，促进干部挂职锻炼选派管理工作的制度化、规范化；第九条、负责抓好干部人事制度改革工作，干部工作的宣传报道以及干部信息、资料收集、综合、上报和反馈工作，承担部领导交办的文稿草拟和其他工作。第十条、完成部领导交办的其他工作。

大学生组织部1分钟自我介绍

大学生组织部1分钟自我介绍大学生组织部1分钟自我介绍篇一尊敬的同学们：大家好！能站在这里参加学生会的竞选，我很高兴也很激动，更要感谢大家对我的支持和信任，谢谢大家。我首先作一下自我介绍，我叫陈然，来自大一（1）班，是（1）班班长、体育委员及治安部大一负责人之一。泰戈尔有句话：“天空中没有鸟的痕迹，但我已飞过。”而我想说：“天空中没有鸟的痕迹，但我正在飞翔”。我想成为学生会组织部的一员，希望在同学们的协助下，我相信我可以把学生会的工作做得更好、更出色。我是一个十分有上进心人的，任何事不做则已，做则一定做好。俗话说：“海阔凭鱼跃，天高任鸟飞”。作为我自己，我需要一个更广阔的空间来展示自己的能力。“欲穷千里目，更上一层楼”，只有站得更高才会看得更远，我希望这次加入学生会组织部是我进步的台阶，我更希望贡献自己微薄的力量，协助学生会组织部搞好各项工作。相信我，相信您的眼光。我愿意为学生会尽我所能。最重要的，我喜欢这里！谢谢！大学生组织部1分钟自我介绍篇二

尊敬的学院领导，你们好！我自愿申请加入学校学生会组织部，这对于我来说是一次鞭策与提高，也是对我的一次锻炼和考验，我申请加入这个组织，并力争为学校教学管理做出自己的一份贡献。我认为学院纪检工作责任很大，它是学院的重要管理组织，不仅担任学院学生会其他工作的开展监督检查督促等职能，更能以自己的表率作用促进学校的管理工作上新台阶，更能激发学生的学习热情，使他们养成良好的习惯，使学生的精神面貌发生新的变化。因此，它对于促进学院学生的管理工作有着重要的意义。可以说学院纪检工作是学院管理工作的重中之中，是管理之基，是服务之本，因此我申请加入这个组织。如果我加入这个组织，我将感到无上光荣，我将严格要求自己，模范遵守学院各项纪律和规定，对照标准找差距，使自己的自身素质的提高，端正学习的态度，树立远大的理想，树立正确的人生观，价值观，珍惜时间，刻苦学习，做遵守纪律的榜样，做认真学习的榜样，为学院实现更大的发展，为学院创造新的辉煌做出自己的贡献，我将从现在起向这一目标奋进，请学院领导批准我的请求。

组织部简介及职能

组织部各科室职责

（一）办公室（信访办公室）１、协助部领导综合协调、处理本部政务和日常事务，做好内部科室协调、对外联系和接待工作，负责部内的保卫、内务管理、后勤服务等工作； 2、负责会议组织、秘书事务、文电处理、文书档案管理和机要保密工作； 3、负责本部信访工作，负责财务的综合管理和协调工作，搞好本部办公用品的购买和固定资产的登记管理，以及协调车辆管理调度等工作； 4、负责印章的保管和使用； 5、负责修订部内管理的有关规章制度并组织实施； 6、承办本部机构编制、干部人事、老干部服务和党群工作，完成部领导交办的其他工作。电话: 传真：（二）研究室 1、负责全县组织系统调研工作，负责有关干部管理和党建工作的理论探讨、政策研究工作，及时调查了解党的基层组织建设、干部工作和人才工作情况，为部领导决策提供建议和方案； 2、承担或参与综合性报告、总结、重要文件和领导讲话稿的起草工作；

3、负责全县组工信息的编发和上报工作； 4、制定研讨课题，指导各乡镇党委的调研工作。电话: 传真：（三）组织科 1、负责全县基层组织建设的宏观指导和管理； 2、指导各镇党的组织的领导班子建设和换届选举； 3、指导乡镇（社区）和县直单位领导班子召开民主生活会； 4、负责党员教育、管理与发展工作的宏观指导； 5、承办党员组织的关系转移手续和党费的管理； 6、负责全县党组织、党员统计和分析工作； 7、负责全县党员教育和发展新党员工作的宏观管理的指导。电话: 传真：（四）干部科（公务员管理科） 1、按照干部管理权限、负责对股级以上领导干部的考察、考核、任免、调配工作及办理退休、工资和职级待遇的审批手续，负责股级干部的备案审查和审批等工作； 2、负责全县各级后备干部的培养、考察工作； 3、指导全县各级领导班子的思想政治作风建设。（五）干部监督科（举报中心） 1、负责县管干部的监督审查工作；

欧洲标准EN简介

欧洲标准E N简介 WTD standardization office【WTD 5AB- WTDK 08- WTD 2C】

欧洲标准E N简介 1.欧洲标准化委员会CEN（European Committee for Stadardization）简介为了适应欧洲共同市场采用统一标准的需要，1951年欧洲炼钢联盟ECSC（European Coal and Steel Community）成立，两年之后钢铁产品术语协调委员会COCOR （Coordinating Commission for the Nomenclature of Iron and Steel Products）产生。在随后30年过程中COCOR率其工作组（其成员由ECSC成员国的标准委员代表组成，具体负责钢分类和产品工作）编制了涉及面很广的钢铁标准手册，它不但有术语标准，还有关于钢产品的尺寸、质量和试验方法的协调统一标准，称为欧洲煤钢联标准 ——EURONORM S ，然而ECSC成员国并没有义务一定要采用EURONORM S 。多数情况下，各成员国在本国范围里仍采用各自的标准。60年代初由欧洲经济联盟EES（European Economic Community）和欧洲自由贸易联盟EFTA（European Free Trade Association）的成员国国家标准团体成立了欧洲标准化委员会CEN和欧洲电工标准化委员会CENLEC（European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization）其分工恰似国际标准化组织ISO和国际电工标准化组织IEC，他们既要协调成员国之间的标准和制订区域性标准，又要在国际场合下维护本地区的利益。其与ECSC不同的是，它的成员国必须无条件采用这两个组织颁布的欧洲标准Ens(European Standards)作为本国标准。二、CEN的组织机构

大学组织部简介

组织部简介一．部室性质组织部是一个严谨的部门，起纽带作用，是协调团委加强全院共青团思想建设、组织建设及共青团干部的培养和管理的重要职能部门。组织个团支部开展活动，并负责做好团干部量化考核工作、鉴定工作，组织开展团员年度考评及团内评优评先等工作。二．工作要求认真负责，忠于职守，严谨高效，务实创新三．部室风气团结进取，积极热情四．部室宗旨知行合一，行胜于言五．工作简介 1．熟练掌握全院各团支部的基本情况，了解基层团组织的活动，组织生活、团总支委员等情况。 2.组织并监督各团支部按时优质的开展团日活动（如团支部风采大赛、校风校纪建设月等）。 3．加强组织建设领导管理各团支组织部的相关工作。 4．负责团干部思想政治教育工作，定期了解团干部的思想状况。 5．制定落实团学干部培训计划，培训方式以培训教育工作积极开展。 6．负责做好团干部量化考核工作、鉴定工作，组织开展团员年度考评及团内评优评先工作。 7．做好团员证的注册和管理工作，做好团员登记、团费收缴、团员组织关系转接等工作。 8．负责各团支部“推优”（推荐优秀团员入党）并完成各团支部党员发展对象的申报、审核、确定等工作。 9．负责我院入党积极分子的培训教育以及积极分子党课考试工作。 10．配合各党支部、团支部做好党员、团员的档案建立和管理工作，做好组织工作中的各种数据统计和材料收集以及党费的收缴工作。 11. 协助党支部组织开展党员民主生活会以及党内评优评先工作，进行监督及时做好汇总和报告工作。 12. 协助党支部进行党员组织活动，组织生活工作.

13．负责新生团支部的建立，高年级班委换届及班委的调动等工作。 14．在需要时，及时协同配合其它部室开展工作。 15．完成团委交办的其它任务。六．部室成员：由1名部长，2名副部长，6名干事组成。

校团委组织部简介和工作职责

校团委组织部简介与工作职责校团委组织部，是负责全校共青团员思想教育、各级团组织的建设及各级团干培养和考核的职能部门。主要工作为加强基层团组织建设和团员教育管理，完善各项规章制度，进行团籍管理；推进以团校培训暨各级团干培训为核心的基层团干部的培训管理及考核; 提高基层团干部及校级学生干部的政治、思想道德素质和工作能力；组织、协调、配合校团委内部各项活动；对院系团委各部门工作进行监督和考核，制定校团委部门评优制度以及组织全校团组织的先进集体和先进个人的评选；负责业余党校的工作和推荐优秀团员作为党的发展对象的工作（简称＂推优＂）．组织部在长期的工作过程中积淀形成了“务实、规范、开拓、奉献、团结、创新、严谨、高效＂这样独具特色的组织文化，同时，注意科学管理方法的运用，积极推进目标化管理、项目化管理、规范化管理和人性化管理，是一支具有很强战斗力和凝聚力的团的骨干队伍。目前下设；秘书处、组织处和团务处。各处室间协调配合，共同推动组织部各项工作的开展。

院团委组织部为你创造一个交流的平台，关注你的成长；为你提供一个发展的机遇，期待你的成熟。今天，你与“组织＂有约，明天，成功将与你有约。院团委组织部的工作职责为： 1、执行团委例会制度，定期召开组织部、分团委组织部门会议，传达学院党委和团的文件精神，布置落实组织工作。 2、制定学期团的组织生活计划，指导各级团组织过好团的组织生活，做好考核并及时组织交流总结。 3、负责对院团委委员、分团委主要团干的考核与管理，加强对全院各级团干部的培养、指导和考察，定期办好团干培训班（团校）。 4、抓好团内奖惩工作。及时掌握团员中的先进典型并做好评优表彰工作；对违纪团员及时进行批评教育及处理，受理团员申诉。 5、定期做好发展新团员工作，办理超龄团员离团手续。 6、搞好团员登记、团籍注册和统计工作，收缴团费，接转团组织关系，协助做好团籍档案管理工作。

市委组织部职能

市委组织部机构职能机构职能市委组织部是市委主管组织工作和干部工作的综合职能部门。（一）研究和指导党组织特别是党的基层组织建设，探索和指导各类新的经济组织中党组织的设置和活动方式，研究和提出党内生活制度建设的意见，协调、规划和指导党员教育工作和党建理论研究，主管党员的管理和发展工作。（二）提出各县（区）和市直各部门以及其他列入市委管理的领导班子调整、配备的意见和建议，负责市管干部的考察和办理任免、工资、待遇、退（离）休审批手续，指导领导班子的思想政治建设，负责各县（区）、乡镇和市直机关科级干部的备案审查和宏观管理工作，承办相关干部的调配、交流、挂职及安置事项。（三）研究制订干部队伍建设的意见，组织落实培养选拔中、青年干部和后备干部、妇女干部及党外干部工作。（四）从宏观上研究和指导党的组织制度和干部人事制度的改革，制订或参与制订组织、干部、人事工作的重要制度。（五）综合指导党的机关，人大、政协机关，群众团体和民主党派机关参照执行（管理）国家公务员制度的工作。（六）负责组织、干部工作的检查督促，了解反映犯有严重错误干部的审查和调查工作等。及时向市委反映重要情况，提出建议。（七）主管干部教育工作。制订干部教育工作的规划，对各县（区）和市直单位的干部培训工作进行协调、指导、检查，组织市管干部和一定层次干部的培训。

（八）参与制订知识分子政策。负责知识分子工作的检查、指导、综合、协调。负责市管优秀专家和拔尖人才的选拔管理。（九）负责全市计算机干部信息，多媒体干部音像资料收集、管理及报送工作。（十）负责退（离）休干部工作的宏观管理。（十一）承办市委和上级组织部门交办的其他事项。科室职能内设机构及职能：（一）秘书科主管本部机要、秘书、信访、文印、文书，负责本部会务组织、文电处理、文件审核及归档、督办检查和机关保密工作，负责本部的人事、工资福利、劳动保险、医疗、计划生育及本部退休人员管理、慰问工作，负责本部的财务、物资、房产、车辆、卫生管理和接待等工作，办理部领导交办事宜。（二）调研科负责全市党的组织建设和干部工作有关方针、政策的综合研究，调查了解市管各级领导班子和干部队伍建设的情况，为部领导决策提供意见和方案，承担干部人事制度改革的综合研究和宏观指导，协调、指导全市组织部门的调研信息工作，主办部刊《惠州组工通讯》，负责组织、干部工作的宣传报道以及本部信息、资料收集、综合、上报和反馈工作，承担部领导交办的文稿草拟和其他工作。（三）组织科研究和指导农村党组织的建设，研究和提出农村党员队伍建设的意见，协

标准化组织介绍

目次 1、ITU介绍 (2) 1.1 ITU的历史和组成 (2) 1.2 ITU的结构 (2) 1.3 ITU-R研究组结构 (2) 1.4 ITU-R SG5的组成 (3) 1.5 ITU-R WP 5D (3) 1.5.1 ITU-R WP 5D介绍 (3) 1.5.2 ITU-R WP5D在2008年7月会议后的最新组成 (3) 1.5.3 各组工作范围和职责 (4) 1.6 ITU与3GPP关系 (4) 2 3GPP组织介绍 (5) 2.1 3GPP介绍 (5) 2.2 3GPP工作范围和目标 (5) 2.3 合作伙伴及成员 (6) 2.4 与其他标准组织的关系 (7) 2.4.1 与3GPP2&Wimax的关系 (7) 2.4.2 与其他标准组织的关系 (7) 2.5 3GPP主要工作成果 (7) 2.6 内部组织结构 (7) 2.7 各组工作范围和职责 (9) 2.8 3GPP工作方法流程 (10) 3 3GPP2 (11) 3.1 3GPP2介绍 (11) 3.2 3GPP2组织结构 (11) 4 CCSA (12) 4.1 简介 (12) 4.2 组织结构 (13) 4.3 TC5介绍及组织结构 (13)

1、ITU介绍 1.1 ITU的历史和组成 ITU（International Telecommunication Union）是电信界最权威的标准制定机构，简称国际电联，成立于1865年5月，1947年10月成为联合国的一个专门机构，总部设在瑞士日内瓦。经过100多年的变迁，1992年12月改革后的ITU下设电信标准部门（ITU-T）、无线电通信部门（ITU-R）、电信发展部门（ITU-D）。每个部门下设多个研究组（Study Group）。每个研究组下设多个工作组（Working Group或Working Party）。 ITU成员由各国电信主管部门组成，也接纳经主管部门批准的从事电信的企业和研究机构参与。 ITU现在由189个成员国,620个行业成员,100合作成员组成。 1.2 ITU的结构 ITU为了便于无线电管理和协调，人为把世界分为三个区域，包括： ◆Region1：由欧洲、俄罗斯、中亚、西亚和非洲组成，主要的区域组织为欧洲的 CEPT，标准制定由欧洲的ETSI完成； ◆Region2：由南北美洲组成，主要的区域组织为CITEL，但美国的FCC起较大作用； ◆Region3：由东亚、东南亚、南亚、伊朗和大洋州组成，主要的区域组织例如中国CCSA、日本ARIB。 1.3 ITU-R研究组结构 Study Group 1(SG 1)-Spectrum management ?Working Party 1A(WP 1A)-Spectrum engineering techniques ?Working Party 1B(WP 1B)-Spectrum management methodologies and economic strategies ?Working Party 1C(WP 1C)-Spectrum monitoring Study Group 3(SG 3)-Radiowave propagation ?Working Party 3J(WP 3J)-Propagation fundamentals ?Working Party 3K(WP 3K)-Point-to-area propagation ?Working Party 3L(WP 3L)-Ionospheric propagation and radio noise ?Working Party 3M(WP 3M)-Point-to-point and Earth-space propagation Study Group 4(SG 4)-Satellite services ?Working Party 4A(WP 4A)-Efficient orbit/spectrum utilization for FSS and BSS ?Working Party 4B(WP 4B)-Systems, air interfaces, performance and availability objectives for FSS,BSS and MSS, including IP-based applications and satellite news gathering ?Working Party 4C(WP 4C)-Efficient orbit/spectrum utilization for MSS and RDSS

大学组织部简介

组织部简介一.部室性质组织部是一个严谨的部门，起纽带作用，是协调团委加强全院共青团思想建设、组织建设及共青团干部的培养和管理的重要职能部门。组织个团支部开展活动，并负责做好团干部量化考核工作、鉴定工作，组织开展团员年度考评及团内评优评先等工作。二.工作要求认真负责，忠于职守，严谨高效，务实创新三.部室风气团结进取，积极热情四.部室宗旨知行合一，行胜于言五.工作简介 1. 熟练掌握全院各团支部的基本情况，了解基层团组织的活动，组织生活、团总支委员等情况。 2. 组织并监督各团支部按时优质的开展团日活动（如团支部风采大赛、校风校纪建设月等）。 3 .加强组织建设领导管理各团支组织部的相关工作。 4 .负责团干部思想政治教育工作，定期了解团干部的思想状况。 5 .制定落实团学干部培训计划，培训方式以培训教育工作积极开展。 6 .负责做好团干部量化考核工作、鉴定工作，组织开展团员年度考评及团内评优评先工作。 7 .做好团员证的注册和管理工作，做好团员登记、团费收缴、团员组织关系转接等工作。 8 .负责各团支部“推优”（推荐优秀团员入党）并完成各团支部党员发展对象的申报、审核、确定等工作。 9 .负责我院入党积极分子的培训教育以及积极分子党课考试工作。 10 .配合各党支部、团支部做好党员、团员的档案建立和管理工作，做好组织工作中的各种数据统计和材料收集以及党费的收缴工作。 11. 协助党支部组织开展党员民主生活会以及党内评优评先工作，进行监督及时做好汇总和报告工作。

13 .负责新生团支部的建立，高年级班委换届及班委的调动等工作。 14 .在需要时，及时协同配合其它部室开展工作 15 .完成团委交办的其它任务。六?部室成员：由1名部长，2名副部长，6名干事组成。

部份国际标准化组织

作者：未知文章来源：本站收集点击数：3250 UL：美国保险商实验所Underwriters Laboratories UL成立于1894年，它是美国最具权威的保险机构。UL标准有五分之三为美国国家标准(ANSI)采用。其前身是美国火灾保险商协会。 UL主要制定安全标准，下设电气、防盗、事故、防火和船舶工程部，以及消费者咨询委员会，负责UL标准的制定工作。UL在国内外从事对各种设备、系统和材料的安全试验与检查，以确定对生命财产是否存在危险，并将检查结果公之于各保险公司、政府机构及其他组织。经检查合格者，发给UL质量标志。UL标志已在许多国家通行。在标准化工作方面，UL与许多组织都有协作关系，如：ANSI、ASTM等。 IS O国际标准化组织 International Organization for Standardization 国际标准化组织是世界上最大的非政府性标准化专门机构，它在国际标准化中占主导地位。ISO制定国际标准。IS O的主要活动是制定国际标准，协调世界范围内的标准化工作，组织各成员国和技术委员会进行情报交流，以及与其他国际性组织进行合作，共同研究有关标准化问题。随着国际贸易的发展，对国际标准的要求日益提高，ISO的作用也日趋扩大，世界上许多国家对ISO也越加重视。 ISO的目的和宗旨是：在世界范围内促进标准化工作的发展，以利于国际物资交流和互助，并扩大在知识、科学、技术和经济方面的合作。 IEC：国际电工委员会 International Electro technical Commission IEC是世界上成立最早的非政府性国际电工标准化机构，是联合国经社理事会(ECOSOC)的甲级咨询组织。目前IE C成员国包括了绝大多数的工业发达国家及一部分发展中国家。这些国家拥有世界人口的80%，其生产和消耗的电能占全世界的95%，制造和使用的电气、电子产品占全世界产量的90%。 IEC的宗旨：促进电工标准的国际统一，电气、电子工程领域中标准化及有关方面的国际合作，增进国际间的相互了解。 ANSI：美国国家标准学会American National Standards Institute 美国国家标准学会是非赢利性质的民间标准化团体，但它实际上已成为美国国家标准化中心，美国各界标准化活动都围绕它进行。通过它，使政府有关系统和民间系统相互配合，起到了政府和民间标准化系统之间的桥梁作用。 ANSI协调并指导美国全国的标准化活动，给标准制定、研究和使用单位以帮助，提供国内外标准化情报。同时，又起着行政管理机关的作用。 BSI：英国标准学会 British Standards Institution 英国标准学会(BSI)是世界上最早的全国性标准化机构，它不受政府控制但得到了政府的大力支持。 BSI制定和修订英国标准，并促进其贯彻执行。 BSI不断发展自己的工作队伍，完善自己的工作机构和体制，把标准化和质量管理以及对外贸易紧密结合起来开展工作。 BSI的宗旨： 1.为增产节约努力协调生产者和用户之间的关系，促进生产，达到标准化（包括简化）。 2.制定和修订英国标准，并促进其贯彻执行。 3.以学会名义，对各种标志进行登记，并颁发许可证。 4.必要时采取各种行动，保护学会利益。

校团委组织部简介

校团委组织部简介校团委组织部，是负责全校共青团员思想教育、各级团组织的建设及各级团干培养和考核的职能部门。主要工作为加强基层团组织建设和团员教育管理，完善各项规章制度，进行团籍管理；推进以团校培训暨各级团干培训为核心的基层团干部的培训管理及考核; 提高基层团干部及校级学生干部的政治、思想道德素质和工作能力；组织、协调、配合校团委内部各项活动；对院系团委各部门工作进行监督和考核，制定校团委部门评优制度以及组织全校团组织的先进集体和先进个人的评选；负责业余党校的工作和推荐优秀团员作为党的发展对象的工作（简称“推优”）．组织部在长期的工作过程中积淀形成了“务实、规范、开拓、奉献、团结、创新、严谨、高效”这样独具特色的组织文化，同时，注意科学管理方法的运用，积极推进目标化管理、项目化管理、规范化管理和人性化管理，是一支具有很强战斗力和凝聚力的团的骨干队伍。在这个队伍里，你能找到一种家的感觉。在这个大家庭里，不仅仅是工作是服务，在这里是历练是学习是为体现本身价值，是为追求理想丰富自己，是为让你接下来的大学生活中多出一次贡献的机会，是为在今后的人生旅途中更好地做自己做更好的自己积累经验...也许是为了也仅仅为了自己的选择赋予的最神圣的使命—责任！校团委组织部为你创造一个交流的平台，关注你的成长；为你提供一个发展的机遇，期待你的成熟。

校团委组织部的工作职责 1、执行团委例会制度，定期召开组织部、分团委组织部门会议，传达学院党委和团的文件精神，布置落实组织工作。 2、制定学期团的组织生活计划，指导各级团组织过好团的组织生活，做好考核并及时组织交流总结。 3、负责基层团干的考核与管理，加强对全院各级团干部的培养、指导和考察以及基层团组织的年度考核、信息统计工作。 4、抓好团内奖惩工作。及时掌握团员中的先进典型并做好评优表彰工作；对违纪团员及时进行批评教育及处理，受理团员申诉。 5、定期做好发展新团员工作，办理超龄团员离团手续。 6、搞好团员登记、团籍注册和统计工作，收缴团费，接转团组织关系，协助做好团籍档案管理工作。 7、负责团内推优工作，协助有关部门做好业余党校学员的推荐工作。 8、按有关规定和院党委要求，有计划地开展推荐优秀团员作为党的发展对象工作，同时做好入党积极分子的建档和管理工作。 9、负责起草、汇编、修订团内管理的有关规定、制度和办法。 10、完成书记交办的其它工作。

三大国际标准化组织

ISO ISO是（International Organization for Standardization）的简称，是目前世界上最大、最有权威性的国际标准化专门机构。其成员由来自世界上117个国家和地区的国家标准化团体组成,代表中国参加ISO的国家机构是中国国家技术监督局(CSBTS)。 ISO的宗旨是在世界范围内促进标准化及有关工作的发展，以利于国际物资交流和服务，并推动各国在科学、技术和经济活动中的相互合作。其主要活动是制定和出版ISO标准，协调世界范围的标准化工作，组织各成员国和技术委员会进行情报交流，以及与其他国际组织进行合作，共同研究有关标准化问题。 ISO制定的标准内容涉及广泛,从基础的紧固件、轴承各种原材料到半成品和成品,其技术领域涉及信息技术、交通运输、农业、保健和环境等。每个工作机构都有自己的工作计划，该计划列出需要制订的标准项目(试验方法、术语、规格、性能要求等)。 ISO与国际电工委员会(IEC)有密切的联系，中国参加IEC的国家机构也是国家技术监督局。 IEC IEC是国际电工委员会（International Electrotechnical Commission）的简称，成立于1906年，它是世界上成立最早的国际性电工标准化机构，负责有关电气工程和电子工程领域中的国际标准化工作。总部设在瑞士日内瓦。 IEC的宗旨是，促进电气、电子工程领域中标准化及有关问题的国际合作，增进国际间的相互了解。目前，IEC的工作领域已由单纯研究电气设备、电机的名词术语和功率等问题扩展到电子、电力、微电子及其应用、通讯、视听、机器人、信息技术、新型医疗器械和核仪表等电工技术的各个方面。IEC标准已涉及了世界市场中35%的产品。 IEC标准的权威性是世界公认的。IEC每年要在世界各地召开一百多次国际标准会议，世界各国的近10万名专家在参与IEC的标准制订、修订工作。IEC 现在有技术委员会(TC)89个；分技术委员会(SC)107个。IEC标准在迅速增加，1963年只有120个标准，截止到2000年12月底，IEC已制定了4885个国际标

团学组织机构各部门职能简介

附件1：团学组织各部门职能简介团委一、组织部 1.负责新老生团组织关系的接收，转移工作，规范团员证、团徽管理，统一各基层团支部的团员证注册工作。进行全院基层团组织团员情况统计调查，作好团员资料的整理和保管工作。 2.负责团费的收缴工作。 3.负责开办团员培训班，对青年积极分子进行培养、教育，作好发展新团员工作，办理新团员的审批手续、考察工作。 4.协助作好年度评优工作，进行优秀团支部、优秀团干及优秀团员的评比工作。 5.协助党组织做好入党积极分子的培养、考察工作，推荐优秀团员作党的发展对象。 6.对团的组织生活提出计划和建议，指导和督促基层团组织开展活动，定期对基层团支部书记进行考核、检查，加强组织纪律性；进行团员教育评议和思想教育培训，安排布置团内理论学习和考核，定期进行检查、督促。 7.按照校团委指示开展各项活动。二、宣传部 1.负责宣传党委及上级团委的主体思想,执行其思想传达任务。 2.负责学部团委内部的思想统一、思想推进。 3.负责学部内部各级团组织活动的设计、组织、安排和进行，完成各团学组织活动计划及新闻稿的改写工作。 4.通过学部主页和微博等形式对内、对外宣传学部的时政思想和工作方针。（备注：有一定网页管理基础者优先。）

学生会一、秘书处秘书处是一个以书面文字工作为主，负责学生会成员培训工作，在学生会起到枢纽作用的部门，其主要工作职能是： 1.负责部内协调和部校学生会联络工作； 2.负责起草学生会章程、总结及规章制度等文件； 3.负责财务管理； 4.负责公文流转与存档； 5.负责组织安排学生会例会、制作周工作历、做好会议记录； 6.负责接待和会务； 7.负责采购与管理办公设备、用品和纪念品，管理固定资产； 8.负责学生会办公室的日常管理以及防火、安全和卫生工作； 9.负责学生会的日常工作，如通知、资料收集等。二、学研部学研部主要以围绕“营造良好的学习风气，共建良好学习氛围”这一主题开展工作，其主要工作职能是： 1.负责组织部内各项科技竞赛活动，并做好参赛选手的选拔和培训工作； 2.负责组织、选拔学生作品参加部、校各级大学生科技创新类活动及竞赛； 3.负责组织开展学生科技成果展等宣传活动，营造热爱科研、投身创新和奋发学习的校园文化氛围； 4.负责部内学生科技赛事级别认定和获奖学生的表彰工作。三、宣传部宣传部的工作主要是围绕着“打造部会精品，宣传品牌活动”的主题展开的，其主要工作职能是： 1.负责活动前横幅、海报的制作。 2.负责对所举办活动进行宣传造势，对内鼓舞学生积极投入，对外充分展示本学部及学生蓬勃向上的精神风采。 3.组织并开展摄影培训、pop字培训等创新活动四、生活部生活部主要是协助学部有关部门做好学生宿舍、学习的管理工作，其主要工

标准化组织介绍

标准化组织介绍本文档为个人总结了国际上主要的标准化组织。有助于全面了解标准化组织的组成，标准分类等。希望能对读者有帮助。分类： ?国际标准化组织 ?地区性的标准化组织 ?专业性的通信标准化组织国际标准化组织IEC/ISO/ITU IEC 国际电工委员会（International Electrotechnical Commission） IEC的宗旨是促进电工、电子领域中标准化及有关方面问题的国际合作，增进相互了解。为实现这一目的，出版包括国际标准在内的各种出版物，并希望各国家委员会在其本国条件许可的情况下，使用这些国际标准。IEC的工作领域包括了电力、电子、电信和原子能方面的电工技术。现已制订国际电工标准3000多个。 IEC对于电磁兼容方面的国际标准化活动有着特殊重要的作用。承担研究工作的主要是电磁兼容咨询委员会(ACEC)、无线电干扰特别委员会(CISPR)和TC77。 IEC与通信有关的技术委员会主要有：

TC1 名词术语； TC3 信息结构、文件和图形符号； TC46 通信和信号传输用电缆、电线、波导、RF连接器和附件；TC48电子设备机电组成和机械结构； TC77 电器设备(包括网络)之间的电磁兼容性； TC81 雷击防护； TC100 音频、视频和多媒体系统与设备； TC103 无线电通信的发射设备； TC 108 视频、音频、信息技术和通信技术领域内的电子设备安全；CISPR 无线电干扰国际特别委员会； ISO/IEC JTC 1 ISO/IEC信息技术联合委员会； ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6 系统间电信和信息交换； ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25 信息技术设备互连； JTC 1/SC 27 IT安全技术； JTC 1/SC 29 视频、图象、多媒体和超媒体信息的译码； JTC 1/SC 36 学习、教育和培训用信息技术。

组织部简介及职能

组织部简介及职能 Prepared on 24 November 2020

部分国际化标准组织及查询网站

UL：美国保险商实验所Underwriters Laboratories UL成立于1894年，它是美国最具权威的保险机构。UL标准有五分之三为美国国家标准(ANSI)采用。其前身是美国火灾保险商协会。UL主要制定安全标准，下设电气、防盗、事故、防火和船舶工程部，以及消费者咨询委员会，负责UL标准的制定工作。UL在国内外从事对各种设备、系统和材料的安全试验与检查，以确定对生命财产是否存在危险，并将检查结果公之于各保险公司、政府机构及其他组织。经检查合格者，发给UL质量标志。UL标志已在许多国家通行。在标准化工作方面，UL与许多组织都有协作关系，如：ANSI、ASTM等。IS国际标准化组织查询International Organization for Standardization 国际标准化组织是世界上最大的非政府性标准化专门机构，它在国际标准化中占主导地位。ISO制定国际标准。ISO的主要活动是制定国际标准，协调世界范围内的标准化工作，组织各成员国和技术委员会进行情报交流，以及与其他国际性组织进行合作，共同研究有关标准化问题。随着国际贸易的发展，对国际标准的要求日益提高，ISO的作用也日趋扩大，世界上许多国家对ISO也越加重视。ISO的目的和宗旨是：在世界范围内促进标准化工作的发展，以利于国际物资交流和互助，并扩大在知识、科学、技术和经济方面的合作。IEC：国际电工委员会查询International Electro technical Commission IEC是世界上成立最早的非政府性国际电工标准化机构，是联合国经社理事会(ECOSOC)的甲级咨询组织。目前IEC成员国包括了绝大多数的工业发达国家及一部分发展中国家。这些国家拥有世界人口的80%，其生产和消耗的电能占全世界的95%，制造和使用的电气、电子产品占全世界产量的90%。IEC的宗旨：促进电工标准的国际统一，电气、电子工程领域中标准化及有关方面的国际合作，增进国际间的相互了解。ANSI：美国国家标准学会American National Standards Institute 美国国家标准学会是非赢利性质的民间标准化团体，但它实际上已成为美国国家标准化中心，美国各界标准化活动都围绕它进行。通过它，使政府有关系统和民间系统相互配合，起到了政府和民间标准化系统之间的桥梁作用。ANSI协调并指导美国全国的标准化活动，给标准制定、研究和使用单位以帮助，提供国内外标准化情报。同时，又起着行政管理机关的作用。BSI：英国标准学会查询British Standards Institution 英国标准学会(BSI)是世界上最早的全国性标准化机构，它不受政府控制但得到了政府的大力支持。BSI制定和修订英国标准，并促进其贯彻执行。BSI不断发展自己的工作队伍，完善自己的工作机构和体制，把标准化和质量管理以及对外贸易紧密结合起来开展工作。BSI的宗旨：1.为增产节约努力协调生产者和用户之间的关系，促进生产，达到标准化（包括简化）。2.制定和修订英国标准，并促进其贯彻执行。3.以学会名义，对各种标志进行登记，并颁发许可证。4.必要时采取各种行动，保护学会利益。DIN：德国标准化学会查询Deutsches Institut fur Normung DIN是德国的标准化主管机关，作为全国性标准化机构参加国际和区域的非政府性标准化机构。DIN是一个经注册的私立协会，大约有6000个工业公司和组织为其会员。目前设有123个标准委员会和3655个工作委员会。DIN于1951年参加国际标准化组织。由DIN和德国电气工程师协会(VDE)联合组成的德国电工委员会(DKE)代表德国参加国际电工委员会。DIN还是欧洲标准化委员会、欧洲电工标准化委员会(CENELEC)和国际标准实践联合会(IFAN)的积极参加国。AFNOR:法国标准化协会法国标准化协会是一个公益性的民间团体，也是一个被政府承认，为国家服务的组织。它接受标准化专署领导，负责标准的制、修订等工作。JIS：日本工业标准调查会查询Japanese Industrial Standard 日本工业标准调查会成立于1946年2月，隶属于通产省工业技术院。它由总会、标准会议、部会和专门委员会组成。标准会议下设29个部会，负责审查部会的设置与废除，协调部会间工作，负责管理调查会的全部业务和制定综合计划。各部会负责最后审查在专门委员会会议上通过JIS标准草案。专门委员会负责审查JIS标准的实质内容。ASME：美国机械工程师协会查询American Society of Mechanical Engineers 美国机械工程师协会成立于1881年12月24日，会员约693000人。ASME主要从事发展机械工